Cargando…

Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image‐guided and adaptive radiotherapy

ClearRT helical kVCT imaging for the Radixact helical tomotherapy system recently received FDA approval and is available for clinical use. The system is intended to enhance image fidelity in radiation therapy treatment planning and delivery compared to the prior MV‐based onboard imaging approach. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tegtmeier, Riley C., Ferris, William S., Bayouth, John E., Miller, Jessica R., Culberson, Wesley S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35570390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13648
_version_ 1784726868055818240
author Tegtmeier, Riley C.
Ferris, William S.
Bayouth, John E.
Miller, Jessica R.
Culberson, Wesley S.
author_facet Tegtmeier, Riley C.
Ferris, William S.
Bayouth, John E.
Miller, Jessica R.
Culberson, Wesley S.
author_sort Tegtmeier, Riley C.
collection PubMed
description ClearRT helical kVCT imaging for the Radixact helical tomotherapy system recently received FDA approval and is available for clinical use. The system is intended to enhance image fidelity in radiation therapy treatment planning and delivery compared to the prior MV‐based onboard imaging approach. The purpose of this work was to characterize the imaging performance of this system and compare this performance with that of clinical systems used in image‐guided and/or adaptive radiotherapy (ART) or computed tomography (CT) simulation, including Radixact MVCT, TomoTherapy MVCT, Varian TrueBeam kV OBI CBCT, and the Siemens SOMATOM Definition Edge kVCT. A CT image quality phantom was scanned across clinically relevant acquisition modes for each system to evaluate image quality metrics, including noise, uniformity, contrast, spatial resolution, and CT number linearity. Similar noise levels were observed for ClearRT and Siemens Edge, whereas noise for the other systems was ∼1.5–5 times higher. Uniformity was best for Siemens Edge, whereas most scans for ClearRT exhibited a slight “cupping” or “capping” artifact. The ClearRT and Siemens Edge performed best for contrast metrics, which included low‐contrast visibility and contrast‐to‐noise ratio evaluations. Spatial resolution was best for TrueBeam and Siemens Edge, whereas the three kVCT systems exhibited similar CT number linearity. Overall, these results provide an initial indication that ClearRT image quality is adequate for image guidance in radiotherapy and sufficient for delineating anatomic structures, thus enabling its use for ART. ClearRT also showed significant improvement over MVCT, which was previously the only onboard imaging modality available on Radixact. Although the acquisition of these scans does come at the cost of additional patient dose, reported CTDI values indicate a similar or generally reduced machine output for ClearRT compared to the other systems while maintaining comparable or improved image quality overall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9194993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91949932022-06-21 Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image‐guided and adaptive radiotherapy Tegtmeier, Riley C. Ferris, William S. Bayouth, John E. Miller, Jessica R. Culberson, Wesley S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging ClearRT helical kVCT imaging for the Radixact helical tomotherapy system recently received FDA approval and is available for clinical use. The system is intended to enhance image fidelity in radiation therapy treatment planning and delivery compared to the prior MV‐based onboard imaging approach. The purpose of this work was to characterize the imaging performance of this system and compare this performance with that of clinical systems used in image‐guided and/or adaptive radiotherapy (ART) or computed tomography (CT) simulation, including Radixact MVCT, TomoTherapy MVCT, Varian TrueBeam kV OBI CBCT, and the Siemens SOMATOM Definition Edge kVCT. A CT image quality phantom was scanned across clinically relevant acquisition modes for each system to evaluate image quality metrics, including noise, uniformity, contrast, spatial resolution, and CT number linearity. Similar noise levels were observed for ClearRT and Siemens Edge, whereas noise for the other systems was ∼1.5–5 times higher. Uniformity was best for Siemens Edge, whereas most scans for ClearRT exhibited a slight “cupping” or “capping” artifact. The ClearRT and Siemens Edge performed best for contrast metrics, which included low‐contrast visibility and contrast‐to‐noise ratio evaluations. Spatial resolution was best for TrueBeam and Siemens Edge, whereas the three kVCT systems exhibited similar CT number linearity. Overall, these results provide an initial indication that ClearRT image quality is adequate for image guidance in radiotherapy and sufficient for delineating anatomic structures, thus enabling its use for ART. ClearRT also showed significant improvement over MVCT, which was previously the only onboard imaging modality available on Radixact. Although the acquisition of these scans does come at the cost of additional patient dose, reported CTDI values indicate a similar or generally reduced machine output for ClearRT compared to the other systems while maintaining comparable or improved image quality overall. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9194993/ /pubmed/35570390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13648 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Tegtmeier, Riley C.
Ferris, William S.
Bayouth, John E.
Miller, Jessica R.
Culberson, Wesley S.
Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image‐guided and adaptive radiotherapy
title Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image‐guided and adaptive radiotherapy
title_full Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image‐guided and adaptive radiotherapy
title_fullStr Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image‐guided and adaptive radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image‐guided and adaptive radiotherapy
title_short Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image‐guided and adaptive radiotherapy
title_sort characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kvct for use in image‐guided and adaptive radiotherapy
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35570390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13648
work_keys_str_mv AT tegtmeierrileyc characterizationofimagingperformanceofanovelhelicalkvctforuseinimageguidedandadaptiveradiotherapy
AT ferriswilliams characterizationofimagingperformanceofanovelhelicalkvctforuseinimageguidedandadaptiveradiotherapy
AT bayouthjohne characterizationofimagingperformanceofanovelhelicalkvctforuseinimageguidedandadaptiveradiotherapy
AT millerjessicar characterizationofimagingperformanceofanovelhelicalkvctforuseinimageguidedandadaptiveradiotherapy
AT culbersonwesleys characterizationofimagingperformanceofanovelhelicalkvctforuseinimageguidedandadaptiveradiotherapy