Cargando…

Knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using a knowledge‐based planning technique to detect poor quality VMAT plans for patients with head and neck cancer. We created two dose–volume histogram (DVH) prediction models using a commercial knowledge‐based planning system (RapidPlan, Varian M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Wenhua, Gronberg, Mary, Olanrewaju, Adenike, Whitaker, Thomas, Hoffman, Karen, Cardenas, Carlos, Garden, Adam, Skinner, Heath, Beadle, Beth, Court, Laurence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35488508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13614
_version_ 1784726874414383104
author Cao, Wenhua
Gronberg, Mary
Olanrewaju, Adenike
Whitaker, Thomas
Hoffman, Karen
Cardenas, Carlos
Garden, Adam
Skinner, Heath
Beadle, Beth
Court, Laurence
author_facet Cao, Wenhua
Gronberg, Mary
Olanrewaju, Adenike
Whitaker, Thomas
Hoffman, Karen
Cardenas, Carlos
Garden, Adam
Skinner, Heath
Beadle, Beth
Court, Laurence
author_sort Cao, Wenhua
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using a knowledge‐based planning technique to detect poor quality VMAT plans for patients with head and neck cancer. We created two dose–volume histogram (DVH) prediction models using a commercial knowledge‐based planning system (RapidPlan, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) from plans generated by manual planning (MP) and automated planning (AP) approaches. DVHs were predicted for evaluation cohort 1 (EC1) of 25 patients and compared with achieved DVHs of MP and AP plans to evaluate prediction accuracy. Additionally, we predicted DVHs for evaluation cohort 2 (EC2) of 25 patients for which we intentionally generated plans with suboptimal normal tissue sparing while satisfying dose–volume limits of standard practice. Three radiation oncologists reviewed these plans without seeing the DVH predictions. We found that predicted DVH ranges (upper–lower predictions) were consistently wider for the MP model than for the AP model for all normal structures. The average ranges of mean dose predictions among all structures was 9.7 Gy (MP model) and 3.4 Gy (AP model) for EC1 patients. RapidPlan models identified 7 MP plans as outliers according to mean dose or D1% for at least one structure, while none of AP plans were flagged. For EC2 patients, 22 suboptimal plans were identified by prediction. While re‐generated AP plans validated that these suboptimal plans could be improved, 40 out of 45 structures with predicted poor sparing were also identified by oncologist reviews as requiring additional planning to improve sparing in the clinical setting. Our study shows that knowledge‐based DVH prediction models can be sufficiently accurate for plan quality assurance purposes. A prediction model built by a small cohort automatically‐generated plans was effective in detecting suboptimal plans. Such tools have potential to assist the plan quality assurance workflow for individual patients in the clinic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9195018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91950182022-06-21 Knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer Cao, Wenhua Gronberg, Mary Olanrewaju, Adenike Whitaker, Thomas Hoffman, Karen Cardenas, Carlos Garden, Adam Skinner, Heath Beadle, Beth Court, Laurence J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using a knowledge‐based planning technique to detect poor quality VMAT plans for patients with head and neck cancer. We created two dose–volume histogram (DVH) prediction models using a commercial knowledge‐based planning system (RapidPlan, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) from plans generated by manual planning (MP) and automated planning (AP) approaches. DVHs were predicted for evaluation cohort 1 (EC1) of 25 patients and compared with achieved DVHs of MP and AP plans to evaluate prediction accuracy. Additionally, we predicted DVHs for evaluation cohort 2 (EC2) of 25 patients for which we intentionally generated plans with suboptimal normal tissue sparing while satisfying dose–volume limits of standard practice. Three radiation oncologists reviewed these plans without seeing the DVH predictions. We found that predicted DVH ranges (upper–lower predictions) were consistently wider for the MP model than for the AP model for all normal structures. The average ranges of mean dose predictions among all structures was 9.7 Gy (MP model) and 3.4 Gy (AP model) for EC1 patients. RapidPlan models identified 7 MP plans as outliers according to mean dose or D1% for at least one structure, while none of AP plans were flagged. For EC2 patients, 22 suboptimal plans were identified by prediction. While re‐generated AP plans validated that these suboptimal plans could be improved, 40 out of 45 structures with predicted poor sparing were also identified by oncologist reviews as requiring additional planning to improve sparing in the clinical setting. Our study shows that knowledge‐based DVH prediction models can be sufficiently accurate for plan quality assurance purposes. A prediction model built by a small cohort automatically‐generated plans was effective in detecting suboptimal plans. Such tools have potential to assist the plan quality assurance workflow for individual patients in the clinic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9195018/ /pubmed/35488508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13614 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Cao, Wenhua
Gronberg, Mary
Olanrewaju, Adenike
Whitaker, Thomas
Hoffman, Karen
Cardenas, Carlos
Garden, Adam
Skinner, Heath
Beadle, Beth
Court, Laurence
Knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer
title Knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer
title_full Knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer
title_short Knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer
title_sort knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35488508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13614
work_keys_str_mv AT caowenhua knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT gronbergmary knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT olanrewajuadenike knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT whitakerthomas knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT hoffmankaren knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT cardenascarlos knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT gardenadam knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT skinnerheath knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT beadlebeth knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT courtlaurence knowledgebasedplanningfortheradiationtherapytreatmentplanqualityassuranceforpatientswithheadandneckcancer