Cargando…
Determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel‐sensitivity‐map for quality assurance applications. Part 2: Photon beam dependence
PURPOSE: The EPID PSM is a useful EPID calibration method for QA applications. The dependence of the EPID PSM on the photon beam used to acquire it has been investigated in this study for the four available PSM methods. The aim is to inform upon the viability of applying a single PSM for all availab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35429117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13602 |
_version_ | 1784726874653458432 |
---|---|
author | Barnes, Michael Paul Sun, Baozhou Oborn, Brad Michael Lamichhane, Bishnu Szwec, Stuart Schmidt, Matthew Cai, Bin Menk, Frederick Greer, Peter |
author_facet | Barnes, Michael Paul Sun, Baozhou Oborn, Brad Michael Lamichhane, Bishnu Szwec, Stuart Schmidt, Matthew Cai, Bin Menk, Frederick Greer, Peter |
author_sort | Barnes, Michael Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The EPID PSM is a useful EPID calibration method for QA applications. The dependence of the EPID PSM on the photon beam used to acquire it has been investigated in this study for the four available PSM methods. The aim is to inform upon the viability of applying a single PSM for all available photon beams to simplify PSM implementation and maintenance. METHODS: Four methods of PSM determination were each measured once in a single session on a single TrueBeam ® STx linac using 6 MV, 10 MV, 6 MV Flattening‐Filter‐Free (FFF), and 10 MV FFF photon beams. The resultant PSM was assessed for both intra‐ and inter‐method beam dependence via comparison between PSM of the same method compared to the 6 MV PSM and via comparison between PSM of the same beam with the corresponding Monte Carlo PSM. Comparisons were performed via 2D percentage deviation plots with associated histograms, 1D crossplane profiles, and via mean, median, and standard deviation percentage deviation statistics. Generated beam‐response was compared qualitatively via 1D crossplane profile comparison and quantitatively via symmetry assessment with comparison to the IC profiler device. RESULTS: The Varian method provided the most consistent PSM with varying photon beam, with median percent deviation from the 6 MV PSM within 0.14% for all other beams. Qualitatively, each method provided similar beam‐response profiles. The measured beam‐response symmetry agreed to within 0.2% between the Calvary Mater Newcastle (CMN) method and IC profiler, but agreement reduced to within 0.9% and 2.2% for the Varian and WashU methods. PSM percent deviation with Monte Carlo PSM was within 0.75% for all methods and beams. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the PSM may be independent of photon beam to clinically relevant levels. The Varian method of PSM determination introduces the least beam dependence into the measured PSM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9195019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91950192022-06-21 Determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel‐sensitivity‐map for quality assurance applications. Part 2: Photon beam dependence Barnes, Michael Paul Sun, Baozhou Oborn, Brad Michael Lamichhane, Bishnu Szwec, Stuart Schmidt, Matthew Cai, Bin Menk, Frederick Greer, Peter J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The EPID PSM is a useful EPID calibration method for QA applications. The dependence of the EPID PSM on the photon beam used to acquire it has been investigated in this study for the four available PSM methods. The aim is to inform upon the viability of applying a single PSM for all available photon beams to simplify PSM implementation and maintenance. METHODS: Four methods of PSM determination were each measured once in a single session on a single TrueBeam ® STx linac using 6 MV, 10 MV, 6 MV Flattening‐Filter‐Free (FFF), and 10 MV FFF photon beams. The resultant PSM was assessed for both intra‐ and inter‐method beam dependence via comparison between PSM of the same method compared to the 6 MV PSM and via comparison between PSM of the same beam with the corresponding Monte Carlo PSM. Comparisons were performed via 2D percentage deviation plots with associated histograms, 1D crossplane profiles, and via mean, median, and standard deviation percentage deviation statistics. Generated beam‐response was compared qualitatively via 1D crossplane profile comparison and quantitatively via symmetry assessment with comparison to the IC profiler device. RESULTS: The Varian method provided the most consistent PSM with varying photon beam, with median percent deviation from the 6 MV PSM within 0.14% for all other beams. Qualitatively, each method provided similar beam‐response profiles. The measured beam‐response symmetry agreed to within 0.2% between the Calvary Mater Newcastle (CMN) method and IC profiler, but agreement reduced to within 0.9% and 2.2% for the Varian and WashU methods. PSM percent deviation with Monte Carlo PSM was within 0.75% for all methods and beams. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the PSM may be independent of photon beam to clinically relevant levels. The Varian method of PSM determination introduces the least beam dependence into the measured PSM. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9195019/ /pubmed/35429117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13602 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Barnes, Michael Paul Sun, Baozhou Oborn, Brad Michael Lamichhane, Bishnu Szwec, Stuart Schmidt, Matthew Cai, Bin Menk, Frederick Greer, Peter Determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel‐sensitivity‐map for quality assurance applications. Part 2: Photon beam dependence |
title | Determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel‐sensitivity‐map for quality assurance applications. Part 2: Photon beam dependence |
title_full | Determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel‐sensitivity‐map for quality assurance applications. Part 2: Photon beam dependence |
title_fullStr | Determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel‐sensitivity‐map for quality assurance applications. Part 2: Photon beam dependence |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel‐sensitivity‐map for quality assurance applications. Part 2: Photon beam dependence |
title_short | Determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel‐sensitivity‐map for quality assurance applications. Part 2: Photon beam dependence |
title_sort | determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel‐sensitivity‐map for quality assurance applications. part 2: photon beam dependence |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35429117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13602 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barnesmichaelpaul determinationoftheelectronicportalimagingdevicepixelsensitivitymapforqualityassuranceapplicationspart2photonbeamdependence AT sunbaozhou determinationoftheelectronicportalimagingdevicepixelsensitivitymapforqualityassuranceapplicationspart2photonbeamdependence AT obornbradmichael determinationoftheelectronicportalimagingdevicepixelsensitivitymapforqualityassuranceapplicationspart2photonbeamdependence AT lamichhanebishnu determinationoftheelectronicportalimagingdevicepixelsensitivitymapforqualityassuranceapplicationspart2photonbeamdependence AT szwecstuart determinationoftheelectronicportalimagingdevicepixelsensitivitymapforqualityassuranceapplicationspart2photonbeamdependence AT schmidtmatthew determinationoftheelectronicportalimagingdevicepixelsensitivitymapforqualityassuranceapplicationspart2photonbeamdependence AT caibin determinationoftheelectronicportalimagingdevicepixelsensitivitymapforqualityassuranceapplicationspart2photonbeamdependence AT menkfrederick determinationoftheelectronicportalimagingdevicepixelsensitivitymapforqualityassuranceapplicationspart2photonbeamdependence AT greerpeter determinationoftheelectronicportalimagingdevicepixelsensitivitymapforqualityassuranceapplicationspart2photonbeamdependence |