Cargando…

Implementing Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment in an Internal Medicine Residency Program: Experience from a Community Hospital

BACKGROUND: ACGME requires all Internal Medicine training programs to structure the curriculum to optimize resident educational experiences, including perioperative medicine. Teaching residents about perioperative risk management is challenging in a community hospital with limited resources and low...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Ji Hyun, Prasongdee, Klaorat, Riano, Ivy, Urbina, Elman, Poloju, Alekya, Treadwell, Thomas, Chun, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Greater Baltimore Medical Center 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711866
http://dx.doi.org/10.55729/2000-9666.1004
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: ACGME requires all Internal Medicine training programs to structure the curriculum to optimize resident educational experiences, including perioperative medicine. Teaching residents about perioperative risk management is challenging in a community hospital with limited resources and low surgical volume. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to introduce an interactive educational module on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and management in a community residency training program. METHODS: The study was a single-center online education-based intervention from September 2020 to January 2021. 24 categorical internal medicine residents at MetroWest Medical center were included. A self-paced online education program followed by two sessions of a 30-minute, group modulated review and discussion were provided monthly. The pre- and post-evaluation with 20 questions were conducted to assess perioperative cardiac risk assessment and peri-operative cardiac risk management before and after education. RESULTS: 20 out of 24 residents (83%) were included in the analysis. Medicine residents performed significantly better after involvement with the educational module by comparing the pre- and post-evaluation score (10.7 ± 2.7 vs. 13.8 ± 1.8, p < 0.001, respectively). The most significant improvement was noticed in postgraduate year PGY-1 residents (5.1 ± 2.5, p < 0.001), followed by PGY-2 (2.7 ± 1.6, p = 0.004), but not significant in PGY-3 residents (1.6 ± 2.3, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementing an interactive multi-modular curriculum in a community hospital increased residents’ awareness and knowledge of perioperative cardiac risk assessment and management. We are confident that this will result in improved performance on the consult services.