Cargando…

Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the most common vaginal infectious diseases in female reproductive period. Although the existing view is that probiotic treatment may be one of the feasible methods for the treatment of BV, different intervention methods lead to different treatment resu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Rongdan, Li, Rong, Qing, Wei, Zhang, Yingxuan, Zhou, Zuyi, Hou, Yi, Shi, Yiya, Zhou, Hongwei, Chen, Muxuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35698149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01449-z
_version_ 1784726923971133440
author Chen, Rongdan
Li, Rong
Qing, Wei
Zhang, Yingxuan
Zhou, Zuyi
Hou, Yi
Shi, Yiya
Zhou, Hongwei
Chen, Muxuan
author_facet Chen, Rongdan
Li, Rong
Qing, Wei
Zhang, Yingxuan
Zhou, Zuyi
Hou, Yi
Shi, Yiya
Zhou, Hongwei
Chen, Muxuan
author_sort Chen, Rongdan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the most common vaginal infectious diseases in female reproductive period. Although the existing view is that probiotic treatment may be one of the feasible methods for the treatment of BV, different intervention methods lead to different treatment results. Therefore, up-to-date and comprehensive evidence in this regard is essential for the development of intervention strategies. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the role of probiotics in the treatment of BV in adult women. METHODS: We searched the databases of Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov for Randomized Controlled Trials published until November 7, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed by Revman5.3 software to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of probiotics adjunctive therapy in the treatment of BV. The literatures were screened and evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Chi-square test was used to test the heterogeneity between trials. Random or Fixed effect models were used to analyze the cure rate of BV. RESULTS: Fourteen randomized controlled trials compared the efficacy of probiotics with antibiotic therapy (probiotics + antibiotics group) versus antibiotics alone or plus placebo (antibiotics (+ placebo) group) for BV [Risk Ratios (RR) = 1.23, 95% CI (1.05, 1.43), P = 0.009]. Three compared the efficacy of probiotics regimen (probiotics group) and antibiotics (antibiotics group) in the treatment of BV [RR = 1.12, 95% CI (0.60, 2.07), P = 0.72]. Another Three compared the efficacy of probiotics regimen (probiotics group) with placebo (placebo group) [RR = 15.20, 95% CI (3.87, 59.64), P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests probiotics may play a positive role in the treatment of BV, but more strong evidence is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9195231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91952312022-06-15 Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial Chen, Rongdan Li, Rong Qing, Wei Zhang, Yingxuan Zhou, Zuyi Hou, Yi Shi, Yiya Zhou, Hongwei Chen, Muxuan Reprod Health Review BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the most common vaginal infectious diseases in female reproductive period. Although the existing view is that probiotic treatment may be one of the feasible methods for the treatment of BV, different intervention methods lead to different treatment results. Therefore, up-to-date and comprehensive evidence in this regard is essential for the development of intervention strategies. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the role of probiotics in the treatment of BV in adult women. METHODS: We searched the databases of Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov for Randomized Controlled Trials published until November 7, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed by Revman5.3 software to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of probiotics adjunctive therapy in the treatment of BV. The literatures were screened and evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Chi-square test was used to test the heterogeneity between trials. Random or Fixed effect models were used to analyze the cure rate of BV. RESULTS: Fourteen randomized controlled trials compared the efficacy of probiotics with antibiotic therapy (probiotics + antibiotics group) versus antibiotics alone or plus placebo (antibiotics (+ placebo) group) for BV [Risk Ratios (RR) = 1.23, 95% CI (1.05, 1.43), P = 0.009]. Three compared the efficacy of probiotics regimen (probiotics group) and antibiotics (antibiotics group) in the treatment of BV [RR = 1.12, 95% CI (0.60, 2.07), P = 0.72]. Another Three compared the efficacy of probiotics regimen (probiotics group) with placebo (placebo group) [RR = 15.20, 95% CI (3.87, 59.64), P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests probiotics may play a positive role in the treatment of BV, but more strong evidence is needed. BioMed Central 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9195231/ /pubmed/35698149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01449-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Chen, Rongdan
Li, Rong
Qing, Wei
Zhang, Yingxuan
Zhou, Zuyi
Hou, Yi
Shi, Yiya
Zhou, Hongwei
Chen, Muxuan
Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_full Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_short Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_sort probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35698149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01449-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chenrongdan probioticsareagoodchoiceforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lirong probioticsareagoodchoiceforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT qingwei probioticsareagoodchoiceforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangyingxuan probioticsareagoodchoiceforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhouzuyi probioticsareagoodchoiceforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT houyi probioticsareagoodchoiceforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shiyiya probioticsareagoodchoiceforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhouhongwei probioticsareagoodchoiceforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenmuxuan probioticsareagoodchoiceforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial