Cargando…

Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare

While biological warfare has classically been considered a threat requiring the presence of a distinct biological agent, we argue that in light of the rise of state-sponsored online disinformation campaigns we are approaching a fifth phase of biowarfare with a “cyber-bio” framing. By examining the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernard, Rose, Bowsher, Gemma, Sullivan, Richard, Gibson-Fall, Fawzia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33090030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0038
_version_ 1784726974843846656
author Bernard, Rose
Bowsher, Gemma
Sullivan, Richard
Gibson-Fall, Fawzia
author_facet Bernard, Rose
Bowsher, Gemma
Sullivan, Richard
Gibson-Fall, Fawzia
author_sort Bernard, Rose
collection PubMed
description While biological warfare has classically been considered a threat requiring the presence of a distinct biological agent, we argue that in light of the rise of state-sponsored online disinformation campaigns we are approaching a fifth phase of biowarfare with a “cyber-bio” framing. By examining the rise of measles cases following disinformation campaigns connected to the US 2016 presidential elections, the rise of disinformation in the current novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, and the impact of misinformation on public health interventions during the 2014-2016 West Africa and 2019-2020 Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola outbreaks, we ask whether the potential impact of these campaigns—which includes the undermining of sociopolitical systems, the delegitimization of public health and scientific bodies, and the diversion of the public health response—can be characterized as analogous to the impacts of more traditional conceptions of biowarfare. In this paper, we look at these different impacts and the norms related to the use of biological weapons and cyber campaigns. By doing so, we anticipate the advent of a combined cyber and biological warfare. The latter is not dependent on the existence of a manufactured biological weapon; it manages to undermine sociopolitical systems and public health through the weaponization of naturally occurring outbreaks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9195489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91954892022-06-14 Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare Bernard, Rose Bowsher, Gemma Sullivan, Richard Gibson-Fall, Fawzia Health Secur Special Feature: Infodemics and Health Security While biological warfare has classically been considered a threat requiring the presence of a distinct biological agent, we argue that in light of the rise of state-sponsored online disinformation campaigns we are approaching a fifth phase of biowarfare with a “cyber-bio” framing. By examining the rise of measles cases following disinformation campaigns connected to the US 2016 presidential elections, the rise of disinformation in the current novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, and the impact of misinformation on public health interventions during the 2014-2016 West Africa and 2019-2020 Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola outbreaks, we ask whether the potential impact of these campaigns—which includes the undermining of sociopolitical systems, the delegitimization of public health and scientific bodies, and the diversion of the public health response—can be characterized as analogous to the impacts of more traditional conceptions of biowarfare. In this paper, we look at these different impacts and the norms related to the use of biological weapons and cyber campaigns. By doing so, we anticipate the advent of a combined cyber and biological warfare. The latter is not dependent on the existence of a manufactured biological weapon; it manages to undermine sociopolitical systems and public health through the weaponization of naturally occurring outbreaks. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-02-01 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9195489/ /pubmed/33090030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0038 Text en © Rose Bernard et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Special Feature: Infodemics and Health Security
Bernard, Rose
Bowsher, Gemma
Sullivan, Richard
Gibson-Fall, Fawzia
Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare
title Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare
title_full Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare
title_fullStr Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare
title_full_unstemmed Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare
title_short Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare
title_sort disinformation and epidemics: anticipating the next phase of biowarfare
topic Special Feature: Infodemics and Health Security
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33090030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0038
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardrose disinformationandepidemicsanticipatingthenextphaseofbiowarfare
AT bowshergemma disinformationandepidemicsanticipatingthenextphaseofbiowarfare
AT sullivanrichard disinformationandepidemicsanticipatingthenextphaseofbiowarfare
AT gibsonfallfawzia disinformationandepidemicsanticipatingthenextphaseofbiowarfare