Cargando…

Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet?

Diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) remains challenging due to a paucity of high-performance diagnostics. Even those that have reasonable sensitivity are not adequate to ‘rule out' TBM. Therefore, a combination of clinical factors alongside microbiological, molecular, and radiological inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ssebambulidde, Kenneth, Gakuru, Jane, Ellis, Jayne, Cresswell, Fiona V., Bahr, Nathan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711276
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.892224
_version_ 1784726993128914944
author Ssebambulidde, Kenneth
Gakuru, Jane
Ellis, Jayne
Cresswell, Fiona V.
Bahr, Nathan C.
author_facet Ssebambulidde, Kenneth
Gakuru, Jane
Ellis, Jayne
Cresswell, Fiona V.
Bahr, Nathan C.
author_sort Ssebambulidde, Kenneth
collection PubMed
description Diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) remains challenging due to a paucity of high-performance diagnostics. Even those that have reasonable sensitivity are not adequate to ‘rule out' TBM. Therefore, a combination of clinical factors alongside microbiological, molecular, and radiological investigations are utilized, depending on availability. A low threshold for starting empiric therapy in the appropriate clinical scenario remains crucial for good outcomes in many cases. Herein, we review the current TBM diagnostics landscape with a focus on limitations frequently encountered, such as diagnostic test performance, cost, laboratory infrastructure, and clinical expertise. Though molecular technologies, particularly GeneXpert MTB/Rif Ultra, have been a step forward, diagnosis of TBM remains difficult. We also provide an overview of promising technologies, such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lactate, a new lipoarabinomannan test (FujiLAM), metagenomic next-generation sequencing, and transcriptomics that may further improve our TBM diagnostic capacity and lead to better outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9195574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91955742022-06-15 Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet? Ssebambulidde, Kenneth Gakuru, Jane Ellis, Jayne Cresswell, Fiona V. Bahr, Nathan C. Front Neurol Neurology Diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) remains challenging due to a paucity of high-performance diagnostics. Even those that have reasonable sensitivity are not adequate to ‘rule out' TBM. Therefore, a combination of clinical factors alongside microbiological, molecular, and radiological investigations are utilized, depending on availability. A low threshold for starting empiric therapy in the appropriate clinical scenario remains crucial for good outcomes in many cases. Herein, we review the current TBM diagnostics landscape with a focus on limitations frequently encountered, such as diagnostic test performance, cost, laboratory infrastructure, and clinical expertise. Though molecular technologies, particularly GeneXpert MTB/Rif Ultra, have been a step forward, diagnosis of TBM remains difficult. We also provide an overview of promising technologies, such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lactate, a new lipoarabinomannan test (FujiLAM), metagenomic next-generation sequencing, and transcriptomics that may further improve our TBM diagnostic capacity and lead to better outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9195574/ /pubmed/35711276 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.892224 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ssebambulidde, Gakuru, Ellis, Cresswell and Bahr. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Ssebambulidde, Kenneth
Gakuru, Jane
Ellis, Jayne
Cresswell, Fiona V.
Bahr, Nathan C.
Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet?
title Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet?
title_full Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet?
title_fullStr Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet?
title_full_unstemmed Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet?
title_short Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet?
title_sort improving technology to diagnose tuberculous meningitis: are we there yet?
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711276
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.892224
work_keys_str_mv AT ssebambuliddekenneth improvingtechnologytodiagnosetuberculousmeningitisarewethereyet
AT gakurujane improvingtechnologytodiagnosetuberculousmeningitisarewethereyet
AT ellisjayne improvingtechnologytodiagnosetuberculousmeningitisarewethereyet
AT cresswellfionav improvingtechnologytodiagnosetuberculousmeningitisarewethereyet
AT bahrnathanc improvingtechnologytodiagnosetuberculousmeningitisarewethereyet