Cargando…

Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND: A growing number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors are available. However, given the limitations in guideline development methodologies and inconsistent recommendations, it remains uncertain how best to design a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Jing-Yu (Benjamin), Zhai, Jianxia, Wang, Tao, Zhou, Hong-Juan, Zhao, Isabella, Liu, Xian-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35712474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.866284
_version_ 1784726997895741440
author Tan, Jing-Yu (Benjamin)
Zhai, Jianxia
Wang, Tao
Zhou, Hong-Juan
Zhao, Isabella
Liu, Xian-Liang
author_facet Tan, Jing-Yu (Benjamin)
Zhai, Jianxia
Wang, Tao
Zhou, Hong-Juan
Zhao, Isabella
Liu, Xian-Liang
author_sort Tan, Jing-Yu (Benjamin)
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A growing number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors are available. However, given the limitations in guideline development methodologies and inconsistent recommendations, it remains uncertain how best to design and implement non-pharmacological strategies to tailor interventions for breast cancer survivors with varied health conditions, healthcare needs, and preferences. AIM: To critically appraise and summarise available non-pharmacological interventions for symptom management and health promotion that can be self-managed by breast cancer survivors based on the recommendations of the CPGs. METHODS: CPGs, which were published between January 2016 and September 2021 and described non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors, were systematically searched in six electronic databases, nine relevant guideline databases, and five cancer care society websites. The quality of the included CPGs was assessed by four evaluators using The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, second edition tool. Content analysis was conducted to synthesise the characteristics of the non-pharmacological interventions recommended by the included CPGs, such as the intervention’s form, duration and frequency, level of evidence, grade of recommendation, and source of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 14 CPGs were included. Among which, only five were appraised as high quality. The “range and purpose” domain had the highest standardized percentage (84.61%), while the domain of “applicability” had the lowest (51.04%). Five CPGs were rated “recommended”, seven were “recommended with modifications”, and the other two were rated “not recommended”. The content analysis findings summarised some commonly recommended self-managed non-pharmacological interventions in the 14 guidelines, including physical activity/exercise, meditation, hypnosis, yoga, music therapy, stress management, relaxation, massage and acupressure. Physical activity/exercise was the most frequently recommended approach to managing psychological and physical symptoms by the included guidelines. However, significant variations in the level of evidence and grade of recommendation were identified among the included CPGs. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for the self-managed non-pharmacological interventions were varied and limited among the 14 CPGs, and some were based on medium- and low-quality evidence. More rigorous methods are required to develop high-quality CPGs to guide clinicians in offering high-quality and tailored breast cancer survivorship care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9195587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91955872022-06-15 Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines Tan, Jing-Yu (Benjamin) Zhai, Jianxia Wang, Tao Zhou, Hong-Juan Zhao, Isabella Liu, Xian-Liang Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: A growing number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors are available. However, given the limitations in guideline development methodologies and inconsistent recommendations, it remains uncertain how best to design and implement non-pharmacological strategies to tailor interventions for breast cancer survivors with varied health conditions, healthcare needs, and preferences. AIM: To critically appraise and summarise available non-pharmacological interventions for symptom management and health promotion that can be self-managed by breast cancer survivors based on the recommendations of the CPGs. METHODS: CPGs, which were published between January 2016 and September 2021 and described non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors, were systematically searched in six electronic databases, nine relevant guideline databases, and five cancer care society websites. The quality of the included CPGs was assessed by four evaluators using The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, second edition tool. Content analysis was conducted to synthesise the characteristics of the non-pharmacological interventions recommended by the included CPGs, such as the intervention’s form, duration and frequency, level of evidence, grade of recommendation, and source of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 14 CPGs were included. Among which, only five were appraised as high quality. The “range and purpose” domain had the highest standardized percentage (84.61%), while the domain of “applicability” had the lowest (51.04%). Five CPGs were rated “recommended”, seven were “recommended with modifications”, and the other two were rated “not recommended”. The content analysis findings summarised some commonly recommended self-managed non-pharmacological interventions in the 14 guidelines, including physical activity/exercise, meditation, hypnosis, yoga, music therapy, stress management, relaxation, massage and acupressure. Physical activity/exercise was the most frequently recommended approach to managing psychological and physical symptoms by the included guidelines. However, significant variations in the level of evidence and grade of recommendation were identified among the included CPGs. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for the self-managed non-pharmacological interventions were varied and limited among the 14 CPGs, and some were based on medium- and low-quality evidence. More rigorous methods are required to develop high-quality CPGs to guide clinicians in offering high-quality and tailored breast cancer survivorship care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9195587/ /pubmed/35712474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.866284 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tan, Zhai, Wang, Zhou, Zhao and Liu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Tan, Jing-Yu (Benjamin)
Zhai, Jianxia
Wang, Tao
Zhou, Hong-Juan
Zhao, Isabella
Liu, Xian-Liang
Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines
title Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_full Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_fullStr Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_short Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_sort self-managed non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors: systematic quality appraisal and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35712474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.866284
work_keys_str_mv AT tanjingyubenjamin selfmanagednonpharmacologicalinterventionsforbreastcancersurvivorssystematicqualityappraisalandcontentanalysisofclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT zhaijianxia selfmanagednonpharmacologicalinterventionsforbreastcancersurvivorssystematicqualityappraisalandcontentanalysisofclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT wangtao selfmanagednonpharmacologicalinterventionsforbreastcancersurvivorssystematicqualityappraisalandcontentanalysisofclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT zhouhongjuan selfmanagednonpharmacologicalinterventionsforbreastcancersurvivorssystematicqualityappraisalandcontentanalysisofclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT zhaoisabella selfmanagednonpharmacologicalinterventionsforbreastcancersurvivorssystematicqualityappraisalandcontentanalysisofclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT liuxianliang selfmanagednonpharmacologicalinterventionsforbreastcancersurvivorssystematicqualityappraisalandcontentanalysisofclinicalpracticeguidelines