Cargando…

How Far Has Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Come Along in Treating Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression?

Antidepressant drugs have been the mainstay for treating patients with major depressive disorder. However, with a rapid rise in the rates of major depressive disorder, there has been a substantial increase in the resistance to antidepressants in the last decade. This has augmented the need for alter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogel, Jake, Soti, Varun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711250
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25928
_version_ 1784727117366296576
author Vogel, Jake
Soti, Varun
author_facet Vogel, Jake
Soti, Varun
author_sort Vogel, Jake
collection PubMed
description Antidepressant drugs have been the mainstay for treating patients with major depressive disorder. However, with a rapid rise in the rates of major depressive disorder, there has been a substantial increase in the resistance to antidepressants in the last decade. This has augmented the need for alternative treatment modalities, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. This review assesses the progress repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has made in treating patients resistant to antidepressants. We conducted a comprehensive literature search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The clinical studies reviewed under the scope of this paper showed significant benefits in treatment-resistant patients. Several studies demonstrated that the prefrontal cortex's unilateral and bilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation increased the remission rates in active treatment groups compared to the control. Treatments ranged from 10 to 20 sessions, with 1,600 pulses to a maximum of 4,000 pulses in unilateral stimulation and 720 to 2,100 pulses in bilateral stimulation per session. Interestingly, bilateral stimulation utilizing fewer pulses showed notable improvement than a higher number of pulses in unilateral stimulation. However, the lack of standardized dose, dosing frequency, treatment duration, and follow-up protocols warrant further research to bring this therapy into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9196141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91961412022-06-15 How Far Has Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Come Along in Treating Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression? Vogel, Jake Soti, Varun Cureus Neurology Antidepressant drugs have been the mainstay for treating patients with major depressive disorder. However, with a rapid rise in the rates of major depressive disorder, there has been a substantial increase in the resistance to antidepressants in the last decade. This has augmented the need for alternative treatment modalities, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. This review assesses the progress repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has made in treating patients resistant to antidepressants. We conducted a comprehensive literature search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The clinical studies reviewed under the scope of this paper showed significant benefits in treatment-resistant patients. Several studies demonstrated that the prefrontal cortex's unilateral and bilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation increased the remission rates in active treatment groups compared to the control. Treatments ranged from 10 to 20 sessions, with 1,600 pulses to a maximum of 4,000 pulses in unilateral stimulation and 720 to 2,100 pulses in bilateral stimulation per session. Interestingly, bilateral stimulation utilizing fewer pulses showed notable improvement than a higher number of pulses in unilateral stimulation. However, the lack of standardized dose, dosing frequency, treatment duration, and follow-up protocols warrant further research to bring this therapy into clinical practice. Cureus 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9196141/ /pubmed/35711250 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25928 Text en Copyright © 2022, Vogel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurology
Vogel, Jake
Soti, Varun
How Far Has Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Come Along in Treating Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression?
title How Far Has Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Come Along in Treating Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression?
title_full How Far Has Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Come Along in Treating Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression?
title_fullStr How Far Has Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Come Along in Treating Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression?
title_full_unstemmed How Far Has Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Come Along in Treating Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression?
title_short How Far Has Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Come Along in Treating Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression?
title_sort how far has repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation come along in treating patients with treatment-resistant depression?
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711250
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25928
work_keys_str_mv AT vogeljake howfarhasrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationcomealongintreatingpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepression
AT sotivarun howfarhasrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationcomealongintreatingpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepression