Cargando…
Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the safety of a novel interlobar fissure division technique using the da Vinci vessel sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent robotic pulmonary lobectomy with node dissection for primary lung cancer betwe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.02.019 |
_version_ | 1784727160925192192 |
---|---|
author | Miyajima, Masahiro Shindo, Yuma Tsuruta, Kodai Nakamura, Yasuyuki Takase, Yoshiaki Aoyagi, Miho Watanabe, Atsushi |
author_facet | Miyajima, Masahiro Shindo, Yuma Tsuruta, Kodai Nakamura, Yasuyuki Takase, Yoshiaki Aoyagi, Miho Watanabe, Atsushi |
author_sort | Miyajima, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We investigated the safety of a novel interlobar fissure division technique using the da Vinci vessel sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent robotic pulmonary lobectomy with node dissection for primary lung cancer between 2018 and 2020 were reviewed. The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 111 patients, whose perioperative factors and postoperative results were compared with those previously reported. Furthermore, the new robotic lung interlobar division technique using the da Vinci vessel sealing system without a robotic stapler was evaluated in patients with low-grade incomplete fissure. We considered the Craig and Walker classification of lung fissures grades 1 and 2 as a good adaptation for the vessel sealing system interlobar fissure division. RESULTS: The vessel sealing system group had shorter mean operative and console times (P = .03 and P = .01, respectively) and lesser median intraoperative blood loss (20 mL vs 50 mL; P = .01). The vessel sealing system group had lower surgical complication rates (2.2% vs 20.0%; P = .01). The incidence of persistent postoperative air leak was lower (0% vs 10.0%; P = .06), and fewer robotic stapler cartridges were used during surgery (3.4 vs 5.6; P < .001) in the vessel sealing system group than in the stapler group. CONCLUSIONS: We report the safety of using the da Vinci vessel sealing system as an alternative to the use of robotic staples for interlobar fissure division in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy. This technique seems easy and feasible though limited to the low-grade incomplete fissure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9196317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91963172022-06-15 Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy Miyajima, Masahiro Shindo, Yuma Tsuruta, Kodai Nakamura, Yasuyuki Takase, Yoshiaki Aoyagi, Miho Watanabe, Atsushi JTCVS Tech Thoracic: Lung Cancer OBJECTIVE: We investigated the safety of a novel interlobar fissure division technique using the da Vinci vessel sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent robotic pulmonary lobectomy with node dissection for primary lung cancer between 2018 and 2020 were reviewed. The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 111 patients, whose perioperative factors and postoperative results were compared with those previously reported. Furthermore, the new robotic lung interlobar division technique using the da Vinci vessel sealing system without a robotic stapler was evaluated in patients with low-grade incomplete fissure. We considered the Craig and Walker classification of lung fissures grades 1 and 2 as a good adaptation for the vessel sealing system interlobar fissure division. RESULTS: The vessel sealing system group had shorter mean operative and console times (P = .03 and P = .01, respectively) and lesser median intraoperative blood loss (20 mL vs 50 mL; P = .01). The vessel sealing system group had lower surgical complication rates (2.2% vs 20.0%; P = .01). The incidence of persistent postoperative air leak was lower (0% vs 10.0%; P = .06), and fewer robotic stapler cartridges were used during surgery (3.4 vs 5.6; P < .001) in the vessel sealing system group than in the stapler group. CONCLUSIONS: We report the safety of using the da Vinci vessel sealing system as an alternative to the use of robotic staples for interlobar fissure division in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy. This technique seems easy and feasible though limited to the low-grade incomplete fissure. Elsevier 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9196317/ /pubmed/35711204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.02.019 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Thoracic: Lung Cancer Miyajima, Masahiro Shindo, Yuma Tsuruta, Kodai Nakamura, Yasuyuki Takase, Yoshiaki Aoyagi, Miho Watanabe, Atsushi Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title | Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title_full | Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title_fullStr | Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title_short | Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title_sort | interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
topic | Thoracic: Lung Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.02.019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyajimamasahiro interlobardivisionusingvesselsealingsysteminrobotassistedpulmonarylobectomy AT shindoyuma interlobardivisionusingvesselsealingsysteminrobotassistedpulmonarylobectomy AT tsurutakodai interlobardivisionusingvesselsealingsysteminrobotassistedpulmonarylobectomy AT nakamurayasuyuki interlobardivisionusingvesselsealingsysteminrobotassistedpulmonarylobectomy AT takaseyoshiaki interlobardivisionusingvesselsealingsysteminrobotassistedpulmonarylobectomy AT aoyagimiho interlobardivisionusingvesselsealingsysteminrobotassistedpulmonarylobectomy AT watanabeatsushi interlobardivisionusingvesselsealingsysteminrobotassistedpulmonarylobectomy |