Cargando…

Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a horizon scan to (1) identify challenges in patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and (2) identify future directions for PC CDS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We engaged a technical expert panel, conducted a scoping literature review, and interviewed key informants. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dullabh, Prashila, Sandberg, Shana F, Heaney-Huls, Krysta, Hovey, Lauren S, Lobach, David F, Boxwala, Aziz, Desai, Priyanka J, Berliner, Elise, Dymek, Chris, Harrison, Michael I, Swiger, James, Sittig, Dean F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35534996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac059
_version_ 1784727248586145792
author Dullabh, Prashila
Sandberg, Shana F
Heaney-Huls, Krysta
Hovey, Lauren S
Lobach, David F
Boxwala, Aziz
Desai, Priyanka J
Berliner, Elise
Dymek, Chris
Harrison, Michael I
Swiger, James
Sittig, Dean F
author_facet Dullabh, Prashila
Sandberg, Shana F
Heaney-Huls, Krysta
Hovey, Lauren S
Lobach, David F
Boxwala, Aziz
Desai, Priyanka J
Berliner, Elise
Dymek, Chris
Harrison, Michael I
Swiger, James
Sittig, Dean F
author_sort Dullabh, Prashila
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We conducted a horizon scan to (1) identify challenges in patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and (2) identify future directions for PC CDS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We engaged a technical expert panel, conducted a scoping literature review, and interviewed key informants. We qualitatively analyzed literature and interview transcripts, mapping findings to the 4 phases for translating evidence into PC CDS interventions (Prioritizing, Authoring, Implementing, and Measuring) and to external factors. RESULTS: We identified 12 challenges for PC CDS development. Lack of patient input was identified as a critical challenge. The key informants noted that patient input is critical to prioritizing topics for PC CDS and to ensuring that CDS aligns with patients’ routine behaviors. Lack of patient-centered terminology standards was viewed as a challenge in authoring PC CDS. We found a dearth of CDS studies that measured clinical outcomes, creating significant gaps in our understanding of PC CDS’ impact. Across all phases of CDS development, there is a lack of patient and provider trust and limited attention to patients’ and providers’ concerns. DISCUSSION: These challenges suggest opportunities for advancing PC CDS. There are opportunities to develop industry-wide practices and standards to increase transparency, standardize terminologies, and incorporate patient input. There is also opportunity to engage patients throughout the PC CDS research process to ensure that outcome measures are relevant to their needs. CONCLUSION: Addressing these challenges and embracing these opportunities will help realize the promise of PC CDS—placing patients at the center of the healthcare system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9196686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91966862022-06-15 Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan Dullabh, Prashila Sandberg, Shana F Heaney-Huls, Krysta Hovey, Lauren S Lobach, David F Boxwala, Aziz Desai, Priyanka J Berliner, Elise Dymek, Chris Harrison, Michael I Swiger, James Sittig, Dean F J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: We conducted a horizon scan to (1) identify challenges in patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and (2) identify future directions for PC CDS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We engaged a technical expert panel, conducted a scoping literature review, and interviewed key informants. We qualitatively analyzed literature and interview transcripts, mapping findings to the 4 phases for translating evidence into PC CDS interventions (Prioritizing, Authoring, Implementing, and Measuring) and to external factors. RESULTS: We identified 12 challenges for PC CDS development. Lack of patient input was identified as a critical challenge. The key informants noted that patient input is critical to prioritizing topics for PC CDS and to ensuring that CDS aligns with patients’ routine behaviors. Lack of patient-centered terminology standards was viewed as a challenge in authoring PC CDS. We found a dearth of CDS studies that measured clinical outcomes, creating significant gaps in our understanding of PC CDS’ impact. Across all phases of CDS development, there is a lack of patient and provider trust and limited attention to patients’ and providers’ concerns. DISCUSSION: These challenges suggest opportunities for advancing PC CDS. There are opportunities to develop industry-wide practices and standards to increase transparency, standardize terminologies, and incorporate patient input. There is also opportunity to engage patients throughout the PC CDS research process to ensure that outcome measures are relevant to their needs. CONCLUSION: Addressing these challenges and embracing these opportunities will help realize the promise of PC CDS—placing patients at the center of the healthcare system. Oxford University Press 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9196686/ /pubmed/35534996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac059 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Dullabh, Prashila
Sandberg, Shana F
Heaney-Huls, Krysta
Hovey, Lauren S
Lobach, David F
Boxwala, Aziz
Desai, Priyanka J
Berliner, Elise
Dymek, Chris
Harrison, Michael I
Swiger, James
Sittig, Dean F
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan
title Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan
title_full Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan
title_fullStr Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan
title_full_unstemmed Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan
title_short Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan
title_sort challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35534996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac059
work_keys_str_mv AT dullabhprashila challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT sandbergshanaf challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT heaneyhulskrysta challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT hoveylaurens challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT lobachdavidf challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT boxwalaaziz challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT desaipriyankaj challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT berlinerelise challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT dymekchris challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT harrisonmichaeli challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT swigerjames challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan
AT sittigdeanf challengesandopportunitiesforadvancingpatientcenteredclinicaldecisionsupportfindingsfromahorizonscan