Cargando…

Sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Urolithiasis is one of the most common diseases in urology, with a lifetime prevalence of 14% and is more prevalent in males compared to females. We designed to explore sex disparities in the Chinese population to provide evidence for prevention measures and mechanisms of stone formation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jin-Zhou, Li, Cong, Xia, Qi-Dong, Lu, Jun-Lin, Wan, Zheng-Ce, Hu, Liu, Lv, Yong-Man, Lei, Xiao-Mei, Guan, Wei, Xun, Yang, Wang, Shao-Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35675329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2085882
_version_ 1784727268511186944
author Xu, Jin-Zhou
Li, Cong
Xia, Qi-Dong
Lu, Jun-Lin
Wan, Zheng-Ce
Hu, Liu
Lv, Yong-Man
Lei, Xiao-Mei
Guan, Wei
Xun, Yang
Wang, Shao-Gang
author_facet Xu, Jin-Zhou
Li, Cong
Xia, Qi-Dong
Lu, Jun-Lin
Wan, Zheng-Ce
Hu, Liu
Lv, Yong-Man
Lei, Xiao-Mei
Guan, Wei
Xun, Yang
Wang, Shao-Gang
author_sort Xu, Jin-Zhou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urolithiasis is one of the most common diseases in urology, with a lifetime prevalence of 14% and is more prevalent in males compared to females. We designed to explore sex disparities in the Chinese population to provide evidence for prevention measures and mechanisms of stone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 98232 Chinese individuals who had undergone a comprehensive examination in 2017 were included. Fully adjusted odds ratios for kidney stones were measured using restricted cubic splines. Multiple imputations was applied for missing values. Propensity score matching was utilised for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Among the 98232 included participants, 42762 participants (43.53%) were females and 55470 participants (56.47%) were males. Patients’ factors might cast an influence on the development of kidney stone disease distinctly between the two genders. A risk factor for one gender might have no effect on the other gender. The risk for urolithiasis in females continuously rises as ageing, while for males the risk presents a trend to ascend until the age of around 53 and then descend. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ factors might influence the development of kidney stones distinctly between the two genders. As age grew, the risk to develop kidney stones in females continuously ascended, while the risk in males presented a trend to ascend and then descend, which was presumably related to the weakening of the androgen signals. KEY MESSAGES: We found that patients’ factors might cast an influence on the development of kidney stone disease distinctly between the two sexes. The association between age and urolithiasis presents distinct trends in the two sexes. The results will provide evidence to explore the mechanisms underlying such differences can cast light on potential therapeutic targets and promote the development of tailored therapy strategies in prospect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9196832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91968322022-06-15 Sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study Xu, Jin-Zhou Li, Cong Xia, Qi-Dong Lu, Jun-Lin Wan, Zheng-Ce Hu, Liu Lv, Yong-Man Lei, Xiao-Mei Guan, Wei Xun, Yang Wang, Shao-Gang Ann Med Nephrology & Urology BACKGROUND: Urolithiasis is one of the most common diseases in urology, with a lifetime prevalence of 14% and is more prevalent in males compared to females. We designed to explore sex disparities in the Chinese population to provide evidence for prevention measures and mechanisms of stone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 98232 Chinese individuals who had undergone a comprehensive examination in 2017 were included. Fully adjusted odds ratios for kidney stones were measured using restricted cubic splines. Multiple imputations was applied for missing values. Propensity score matching was utilised for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Among the 98232 included participants, 42762 participants (43.53%) were females and 55470 participants (56.47%) were males. Patients’ factors might cast an influence on the development of kidney stone disease distinctly between the two genders. A risk factor for one gender might have no effect on the other gender. The risk for urolithiasis in females continuously rises as ageing, while for males the risk presents a trend to ascend until the age of around 53 and then descend. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ factors might influence the development of kidney stones distinctly between the two genders. As age grew, the risk to develop kidney stones in females continuously ascended, while the risk in males presented a trend to ascend and then descend, which was presumably related to the weakening of the androgen signals. KEY MESSAGES: We found that patients’ factors might cast an influence on the development of kidney stone disease distinctly between the two sexes. The association between age and urolithiasis presents distinct trends in the two sexes. The results will provide evidence to explore the mechanisms underlying such differences can cast light on potential therapeutic targets and promote the development of tailored therapy strategies in prospect. Taylor & Francis 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9196832/ /pubmed/35675329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2085882 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nephrology & Urology
Xu, Jin-Zhou
Li, Cong
Xia, Qi-Dong
Lu, Jun-Lin
Wan, Zheng-Ce
Hu, Liu
Lv, Yong-Man
Lei, Xiao-Mei
Guan, Wei
Xun, Yang
Wang, Shao-Gang
Sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study
title Sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study
title_full Sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study
title_short Sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study
title_sort sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study
topic Nephrology & Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35675329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2085882
work_keys_str_mv AT xujinzhou sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT licong sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT xiaqidong sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT lujunlin sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT wanzhengce sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT huliu sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT lvyongman sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT leixiaomei sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT guanwei sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT xunyang sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy
AT wangshaogang sexdisparitiesandtheriskofurolithiasisalargecrosssectionalstudy