Cargando…
A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for treatment of large renal stone >2 cm. The prone position is the classical position preferred by most surgeons. Aiming to improve patient anesthesia and surgery-related inconveniences of the prone position, Valdivia et al., 19...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711483 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_31_20 |
_version_ | 1784727305642311680 |
---|---|
author | Zanaty, Fouad Mousa, Alaa Elgharabawy, Mohamed Elshazly, Mohamed Sultan, Sultan |
author_facet | Zanaty, Fouad Mousa, Alaa Elgharabawy, Mohamed Elshazly, Mohamed Sultan, Sultan |
author_sort | Zanaty, Fouad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for treatment of large renal stone >2 cm. The prone position is the classical position preferred by most surgeons. Aiming to improve patient anesthesia and surgery-related inconveniences of the prone position, Valdivia et al., 1987, described the performance of PCNL with the patient in the supine position. Hence, we aimed to study the safety and efficacy of flank-free modified supine position in PCNL compared to the standard prone position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective randomized study for 60 patients with large renal stones planned for PCNL operation during the period from November 2017 to May 2019. Patients were divided into two groups (30 patients each group): Group A – patients underwent PCNL in the prone position and Group B – patients underwent PCNL in the modified flank supine position. Patients’ demographics, stone size, Hounsfield unit with intraoperative details as fluoroscopy time, operative time, and complications were recorded. Postoperatively, need for or not to blood transfusions, hospital stay, stone-free status, and postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the prone and supine positions regarding stone size (4 cm vs. 4.5 cm, P = 0.16), Hounsfield unit (940 HU vs. 955 HU, P = 0.78), body mass index (31.2 kg/m(2) vs. 32.5 kg/m(2), P = 0.49), fluoroscopy time (6.9 min vs. 7.3 min, P = 0.5), operative time (89.5 min vs. 90.4 min, P = 0.9), residual stones (10% vs. 20%, P = 0.8), and hospital stay (45.6 h vs. 48.6 h, P = 0.5). Fever occurred in 3.3% of cases in each group and urine leakage observed in one patient with prone position. No blood transfusion was needed in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCNL in the modified supine position proved to be a safe and effective choice compared to the prone position for adult patients with large renal calculi. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9197000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91970002022-06-15 A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience Zanaty, Fouad Mousa, Alaa Elgharabawy, Mohamed Elshazly, Mohamed Sultan, Sultan Urol Ann Original Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for treatment of large renal stone >2 cm. The prone position is the classical position preferred by most surgeons. Aiming to improve patient anesthesia and surgery-related inconveniences of the prone position, Valdivia et al., 1987, described the performance of PCNL with the patient in the supine position. Hence, we aimed to study the safety and efficacy of flank-free modified supine position in PCNL compared to the standard prone position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective randomized study for 60 patients with large renal stones planned for PCNL operation during the period from November 2017 to May 2019. Patients were divided into two groups (30 patients each group): Group A – patients underwent PCNL in the prone position and Group B – patients underwent PCNL in the modified flank supine position. Patients’ demographics, stone size, Hounsfield unit with intraoperative details as fluoroscopy time, operative time, and complications were recorded. Postoperatively, need for or not to blood transfusions, hospital stay, stone-free status, and postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the prone and supine positions regarding stone size (4 cm vs. 4.5 cm, P = 0.16), Hounsfield unit (940 HU vs. 955 HU, P = 0.78), body mass index (31.2 kg/m(2) vs. 32.5 kg/m(2), P = 0.49), fluoroscopy time (6.9 min vs. 7.3 min, P = 0.5), operative time (89.5 min vs. 90.4 min, P = 0.9), residual stones (10% vs. 20%, P = 0.8), and hospital stay (45.6 h vs. 48.6 h, P = 0.5). Fever occurred in 3.3% of cases in each group and urine leakage observed in one patient with prone position. No blood transfusion was needed in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCNL in the modified supine position proved to be a safe and effective choice compared to the prone position for adult patients with large renal calculi. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9197000/ /pubmed/35711483 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_31_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Urology Annals https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zanaty, Fouad Mousa, Alaa Elgharabawy, Mohamed Elshazly, Mohamed Sultan, Sultan A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience |
title | A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience |
title_full | A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience |
title_fullStr | A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience |
title_short | A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience |
title_sort | prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center initial experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711483 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_31_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zanatyfouad aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience AT mousaalaa aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience AT elgharabawymohamed aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience AT elshazlymohamed aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience AT sultansultan aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience AT zanatyfouad prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience AT mousaalaa prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience AT elgharabawymohamed prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience AT elshazlymohamed prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience AT sultansultan prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience |