Cargando…

A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for treatment of large renal stone >2 cm. The prone position is the classical position preferred by most surgeons. Aiming to improve patient anesthesia and surgery-related inconveniences of the prone position, Valdivia et al., 19...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zanaty, Fouad, Mousa, Alaa, Elgharabawy, Mohamed, Elshazly, Mohamed, Sultan, Sultan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711483
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_31_20
_version_ 1784727305642311680
author Zanaty, Fouad
Mousa, Alaa
Elgharabawy, Mohamed
Elshazly, Mohamed
Sultan, Sultan
author_facet Zanaty, Fouad
Mousa, Alaa
Elgharabawy, Mohamed
Elshazly, Mohamed
Sultan, Sultan
author_sort Zanaty, Fouad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for treatment of large renal stone >2 cm. The prone position is the classical position preferred by most surgeons. Aiming to improve patient anesthesia and surgery-related inconveniences of the prone position, Valdivia et al., 1987, described the performance of PCNL with the patient in the supine position. Hence, we aimed to study the safety and efficacy of flank-free modified supine position in PCNL compared to the standard prone position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective randomized study for 60 patients with large renal stones planned for PCNL operation during the period from November 2017 to May 2019. Patients were divided into two groups (30 patients each group): Group A – patients underwent PCNL in the prone position and Group B – patients underwent PCNL in the modified flank supine position. Patients’ demographics, stone size, Hounsfield unit with intraoperative details as fluoroscopy time, operative time, and complications were recorded. Postoperatively, need for or not to blood transfusions, hospital stay, stone-free status, and postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the prone and supine positions regarding stone size (4 cm vs. 4.5 cm, P = 0.16), Hounsfield unit (940 HU vs. 955 HU, P = 0.78), body mass index (31.2 kg/m(2) vs. 32.5 kg/m(2), P = 0.49), fluoroscopy time (6.9 min vs. 7.3 min, P = 0.5), operative time (89.5 min vs. 90.4 min, P = 0.9), residual stones (10% vs. 20%, P = 0.8), and hospital stay (45.6 h vs. 48.6 h, P = 0.5). Fever occurred in 3.3% of cases in each group and urine leakage observed in one patient with prone position. No blood transfusion was needed in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCNL in the modified supine position proved to be a safe and effective choice compared to the prone position for adult patients with large renal calculi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9197000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91970002022-06-15 A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience Zanaty, Fouad Mousa, Alaa Elgharabawy, Mohamed Elshazly, Mohamed Sultan, Sultan Urol Ann Original Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for treatment of large renal stone >2 cm. The prone position is the classical position preferred by most surgeons. Aiming to improve patient anesthesia and surgery-related inconveniences of the prone position, Valdivia et al., 1987, described the performance of PCNL with the patient in the supine position. Hence, we aimed to study the safety and efficacy of flank-free modified supine position in PCNL compared to the standard prone position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective randomized study for 60 patients with large renal stones planned for PCNL operation during the period from November 2017 to May 2019. Patients were divided into two groups (30 patients each group): Group A – patients underwent PCNL in the prone position and Group B – patients underwent PCNL in the modified flank supine position. Patients’ demographics, stone size, Hounsfield unit with intraoperative details as fluoroscopy time, operative time, and complications were recorded. Postoperatively, need for or not to blood transfusions, hospital stay, stone-free status, and postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the prone and supine positions regarding stone size (4 cm vs. 4.5 cm, P = 0.16), Hounsfield unit (940 HU vs. 955 HU, P = 0.78), body mass index (31.2 kg/m(2) vs. 32.5 kg/m(2), P = 0.49), fluoroscopy time (6.9 min vs. 7.3 min, P = 0.5), operative time (89.5 min vs. 90.4 min, P = 0.9), residual stones (10% vs. 20%, P = 0.8), and hospital stay (45.6 h vs. 48.6 h, P = 0.5). Fever occurred in 3.3% of cases in each group and urine leakage observed in one patient with prone position. No blood transfusion was needed in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCNL in the modified supine position proved to be a safe and effective choice compared to the prone position for adult patients with large renal calculi. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9197000/ /pubmed/35711483 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_31_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Urology Annals https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zanaty, Fouad
Mousa, Alaa
Elgharabawy, Mohamed
Elshazly, Mohamed
Sultan, Sultan
A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience
title A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience
title_full A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience
title_fullStr A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience
title_short A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience
title_sort prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center initial experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711483
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_31_20
work_keys_str_mv AT zanatyfouad aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience
AT mousaalaa aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience
AT elgharabawymohamed aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience
AT elshazlymohamed aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience
AT sultansultan aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience
AT zanatyfouad prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience
AT mousaalaa prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience
AT elgharabawymohamed prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience
AT elshazlymohamed prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience
AT sultansultan prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofstandardpronepositionversusflankfreemodifiedsupinepositioninpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasinglecenterinitialexperience