Cargando…

Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic abscess is a serious urological problem that needs immediate attention due to its high morbidity and mortality in absence of appropriate treatment. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various modalities of management of prostatic abscess: medi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pathak, Amrendra, Shrestha, Manish Kiran, Khanna, Sudhir, Nanavati, Juhil Dipak, Prasad, Om Prakash, Gupta, Arun, Mistry, Tejas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711491
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_161_20
_version_ 1784727307157504000
author Pathak, Amrendra
Shrestha, Manish Kiran
Khanna, Sudhir
Nanavati, Juhil Dipak
Prasad, Om Prakash
Gupta, Arun
Mistry, Tejas
author_facet Pathak, Amrendra
Shrestha, Manish Kiran
Khanna, Sudhir
Nanavati, Juhil Dipak
Prasad, Om Prakash
Gupta, Arun
Mistry, Tejas
author_sort Pathak, Amrendra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Prostatic abscess is a serious urological problem that needs immediate attention due to its high morbidity and mortality in absence of appropriate treatment. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various modalities of management of prostatic abscess: medical management (MM), transrectal ultrasound-guided aspiration (TRUS-GA), and transurethral deroofing (TU-DR METHODS: This retrospective study was done in a tertiary care center after taking approval from the institutional review board. Conservative management was done by oral or parenteral medications. Transrectal ultrasound GAs were performed under local anesthesia with an 18-gauge two-part needle. Collapse of cavity was seen in “real time” on TRUS. TU-DR of the prostate was done by 26 French continuous irrigation monopolar resectoscopes. The aspirated pus was sent for microbiological investigation. RESULTS: TRUS-guided aspiration was performed in 20 patients, TU-DR in five patients, and conservative management in 15 patients. The mean volume of abscess aspirated by TRUS guidance was 13 cc (range 8–50 cc) with single-time aspiration in 85% of cases. Re-aspiration was done in 3 patients. The mean volume of abscess was 33.2 cc (range: 25–40 cc) in TU-DR group and 1.2 cc (range 0.5–2.0 cc) in the MM group. The predominant organism isolated was Escherichia coli (48%). Clinical improvement was seen in 97.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: We suggest TRUS-GA for symptomatic patients with abscess size more than 2 cc and TU-DR if TRUS-GA fails or is contraindicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9197006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91970062022-06-15 Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience Pathak, Amrendra Shrestha, Manish Kiran Khanna, Sudhir Nanavati, Juhil Dipak Prasad, Om Prakash Gupta, Arun Mistry, Tejas Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: Prostatic abscess is a serious urological problem that needs immediate attention due to its high morbidity and mortality in absence of appropriate treatment. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various modalities of management of prostatic abscess: medical management (MM), transrectal ultrasound-guided aspiration (TRUS-GA), and transurethral deroofing (TU-DR METHODS: This retrospective study was done in a tertiary care center after taking approval from the institutional review board. Conservative management was done by oral or parenteral medications. Transrectal ultrasound GAs were performed under local anesthesia with an 18-gauge two-part needle. Collapse of cavity was seen in “real time” on TRUS. TU-DR of the prostate was done by 26 French continuous irrigation monopolar resectoscopes. The aspirated pus was sent for microbiological investigation. RESULTS: TRUS-guided aspiration was performed in 20 patients, TU-DR in five patients, and conservative management in 15 patients. The mean volume of abscess aspirated by TRUS guidance was 13 cc (range 8–50 cc) with single-time aspiration in 85% of cases. Re-aspiration was done in 3 patients. The mean volume of abscess was 33.2 cc (range: 25–40 cc) in TU-DR group and 1.2 cc (range 0.5–2.0 cc) in the MM group. The predominant organism isolated was Escherichia coli (48%). Clinical improvement was seen in 97.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: We suggest TRUS-GA for symptomatic patients with abscess size more than 2 cc and TU-DR if TRUS-GA fails or is contraindicated. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9197006/ /pubmed/35711491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_161_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Urology Annals https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pathak, Amrendra
Shrestha, Manish Kiran
Khanna, Sudhir
Nanavati, Juhil Dipak
Prasad, Om Prakash
Gupta, Arun
Mistry, Tejas
Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience
title Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience
title_full Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience
title_fullStr Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience
title_short Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience
title_sort contemporary management of prostatic abscess: our experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711491
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_161_20
work_keys_str_mv AT pathakamrendra contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience
AT shresthamanishkiran contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience
AT khannasudhir contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience
AT nanavatijuhildipak contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience
AT prasadomprakash contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience
AT guptaarun contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience
AT mistrytejas contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience