Cargando…
Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience
INTRODUCTION: Prostatic abscess is a serious urological problem that needs immediate attention due to its high morbidity and mortality in absence of appropriate treatment. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various modalities of management of prostatic abscess: medi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_161_20 |
_version_ | 1784727307157504000 |
---|---|
author | Pathak, Amrendra Shrestha, Manish Kiran Khanna, Sudhir Nanavati, Juhil Dipak Prasad, Om Prakash Gupta, Arun Mistry, Tejas |
author_facet | Pathak, Amrendra Shrestha, Manish Kiran Khanna, Sudhir Nanavati, Juhil Dipak Prasad, Om Prakash Gupta, Arun Mistry, Tejas |
author_sort | Pathak, Amrendra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Prostatic abscess is a serious urological problem that needs immediate attention due to its high morbidity and mortality in absence of appropriate treatment. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various modalities of management of prostatic abscess: medical management (MM), transrectal ultrasound-guided aspiration (TRUS-GA), and transurethral deroofing (TU-DR METHODS: This retrospective study was done in a tertiary care center after taking approval from the institutional review board. Conservative management was done by oral or parenteral medications. Transrectal ultrasound GAs were performed under local anesthesia with an 18-gauge two-part needle. Collapse of cavity was seen in “real time” on TRUS. TU-DR of the prostate was done by 26 French continuous irrigation monopolar resectoscopes. The aspirated pus was sent for microbiological investigation. RESULTS: TRUS-guided aspiration was performed in 20 patients, TU-DR in five patients, and conservative management in 15 patients. The mean volume of abscess aspirated by TRUS guidance was 13 cc (range 8–50 cc) with single-time aspiration in 85% of cases. Re-aspiration was done in 3 patients. The mean volume of abscess was 33.2 cc (range: 25–40 cc) in TU-DR group and 1.2 cc (range 0.5–2.0 cc) in the MM group. The predominant organism isolated was Escherichia coli (48%). Clinical improvement was seen in 97.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: We suggest TRUS-GA for symptomatic patients with abscess size more than 2 cc and TU-DR if TRUS-GA fails or is contraindicated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9197006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91970062022-06-15 Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience Pathak, Amrendra Shrestha, Manish Kiran Khanna, Sudhir Nanavati, Juhil Dipak Prasad, Om Prakash Gupta, Arun Mistry, Tejas Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: Prostatic abscess is a serious urological problem that needs immediate attention due to its high morbidity and mortality in absence of appropriate treatment. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various modalities of management of prostatic abscess: medical management (MM), transrectal ultrasound-guided aspiration (TRUS-GA), and transurethral deroofing (TU-DR METHODS: This retrospective study was done in a tertiary care center after taking approval from the institutional review board. Conservative management was done by oral or parenteral medications. Transrectal ultrasound GAs were performed under local anesthesia with an 18-gauge two-part needle. Collapse of cavity was seen in “real time” on TRUS. TU-DR of the prostate was done by 26 French continuous irrigation monopolar resectoscopes. The aspirated pus was sent for microbiological investigation. RESULTS: TRUS-guided aspiration was performed in 20 patients, TU-DR in five patients, and conservative management in 15 patients. The mean volume of abscess aspirated by TRUS guidance was 13 cc (range 8–50 cc) with single-time aspiration in 85% of cases. Re-aspiration was done in 3 patients. The mean volume of abscess was 33.2 cc (range: 25–40 cc) in TU-DR group and 1.2 cc (range 0.5–2.0 cc) in the MM group. The predominant organism isolated was Escherichia coli (48%). Clinical improvement was seen in 97.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: We suggest TRUS-GA for symptomatic patients with abscess size more than 2 cc and TU-DR if TRUS-GA fails or is contraindicated. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9197006/ /pubmed/35711491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_161_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Urology Annals https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pathak, Amrendra Shrestha, Manish Kiran Khanna, Sudhir Nanavati, Juhil Dipak Prasad, Om Prakash Gupta, Arun Mistry, Tejas Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience |
title | Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience |
title_full | Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience |
title_fullStr | Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience |
title_short | Contemporary management of prostatic abscess: Our experience |
title_sort | contemporary management of prostatic abscess: our experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_161_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pathakamrendra contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience AT shresthamanishkiran contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience AT khannasudhir contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience AT nanavatijuhildipak contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience AT prasadomprakash contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience AT guptaarun contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience AT mistrytejas contemporarymanagementofprostaticabscessourexperience |