Cargando…

Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections

Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Runyan, Hugh, Petrovic, Vid, Edwards, Clinton B., Pedersen, Nicole, Alcantar, Esmeralda, Kuester, Falko, Sandin, Stuart A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35712550
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.884317
_version_ 1784727355620589568
author Runyan, Hugh
Petrovic, Vid
Edwards, Clinton B.
Pedersen, Nicole
Alcantar, Esmeralda
Kuester, Falko
Sandin, Stuart A.
author_facet Runyan, Hugh
Petrovic, Vid
Edwards, Clinton B.
Pedersen, Nicole
Alcantar, Esmeralda
Kuester, Falko
Sandin, Stuart A.
author_sort Runyan, Hugh
collection PubMed
description Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models, allow researchers to study a comprehensive digital twin of their field sites. Spatio-temporally located twins can be compared and annotated, enabling researchers to virtually return to sites long after they have left them. While these new data expand the variety and specificity of biological investigation that can be pursued, they have introduced the much-discussed Big Data Problem: research labs lack the human and computational resources required to process and analyze imagery at the rate it can be collected. The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles suggests researchers will soon have access to an even greater volume of imagery and other sensor measurements than can be collected by diver-piloted platforms, further exacerbating data handling limitations. Thoroughly segmenting (tracing the extent of and taxonomically identifying) organisms enables researchers to extract the information image products contain, but is very time-consuming. Analytic techniques driven by neural networks offer the possibility that the segmentation process can be greatly accelerated through automation. In this study, we examine the efficacy of automated segmentation on three different image-derived data products: 3D models, and 2D and 2.5D orthographic projections thereof; we also contrast their relative accessibility and utility to different avenues of biological inquiry. The variety of network architectures and parameters tested performed similarly, ∼80% IoU for the genus Porites, suggesting that the primary limitations to an automated workflow are 1) the current capabilities of neural network technology, and 2) consistency and quality control in image product collection and human training/testing dataset generation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9197210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91972102022-06-15 Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections Runyan, Hugh Petrovic, Vid Edwards, Clinton B. Pedersen, Nicole Alcantar, Esmeralda Kuester, Falko Sandin, Stuart A. Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models, allow researchers to study a comprehensive digital twin of their field sites. Spatio-temporally located twins can be compared and annotated, enabling researchers to virtually return to sites long after they have left them. While these new data expand the variety and specificity of biological investigation that can be pursued, they have introduced the much-discussed Big Data Problem: research labs lack the human and computational resources required to process and analyze imagery at the rate it can be collected. The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles suggests researchers will soon have access to an even greater volume of imagery and other sensor measurements than can be collected by diver-piloted platforms, further exacerbating data handling limitations. Thoroughly segmenting (tracing the extent of and taxonomically identifying) organisms enables researchers to extract the information image products contain, but is very time-consuming. Analytic techniques driven by neural networks offer the possibility that the segmentation process can be greatly accelerated through automation. In this study, we examine the efficacy of automated segmentation on three different image-derived data products: 3D models, and 2D and 2.5D orthographic projections thereof; we also contrast their relative accessibility and utility to different avenues of biological inquiry. The variety of network architectures and parameters tested performed similarly, ∼80% IoU for the genus Porites, suggesting that the primary limitations to an automated workflow are 1) the current capabilities of neural network technology, and 2) consistency and quality control in image product collection and human training/testing dataset generation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9197210/ /pubmed/35712550 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.884317 Text en Copyright © 2022 Runyan, Petrovic, Edwards, Pedersen, Alcantar, Kuester and Sandin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Robotics and AI
Runyan, Hugh
Petrovic, Vid
Edwards, Clinton B.
Pedersen, Nicole
Alcantar, Esmeralda
Kuester, Falko
Sandin, Stuart A.
Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections
title Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections
title_full Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections
title_fullStr Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections
title_full_unstemmed Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections
title_short Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections
title_sort automated 2d, 2.5d, and 3d segmentation of coral reef pointclouds and orthoprojections
topic Robotics and AI
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35712550
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.884317
work_keys_str_mv AT runyanhugh automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections
AT petrovicvid automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections
AT edwardsclintonb automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections
AT pedersennicole automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections
AT alcantaresmeralda automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections
AT kuesterfalko automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections
AT sandinstuarta automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections