Cargando…
Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections
Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35712550 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.884317 |
_version_ | 1784727355620589568 |
---|---|
author | Runyan, Hugh Petrovic, Vid Edwards, Clinton B. Pedersen, Nicole Alcantar, Esmeralda Kuester, Falko Sandin, Stuart A. |
author_facet | Runyan, Hugh Petrovic, Vid Edwards, Clinton B. Pedersen, Nicole Alcantar, Esmeralda Kuester, Falko Sandin, Stuart A. |
author_sort | Runyan, Hugh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models, allow researchers to study a comprehensive digital twin of their field sites. Spatio-temporally located twins can be compared and annotated, enabling researchers to virtually return to sites long after they have left them. While these new data expand the variety and specificity of biological investigation that can be pursued, they have introduced the much-discussed Big Data Problem: research labs lack the human and computational resources required to process and analyze imagery at the rate it can be collected. The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles suggests researchers will soon have access to an even greater volume of imagery and other sensor measurements than can be collected by diver-piloted platforms, further exacerbating data handling limitations. Thoroughly segmenting (tracing the extent of and taxonomically identifying) organisms enables researchers to extract the information image products contain, but is very time-consuming. Analytic techniques driven by neural networks offer the possibility that the segmentation process can be greatly accelerated through automation. In this study, we examine the efficacy of automated segmentation on three different image-derived data products: 3D models, and 2D and 2.5D orthographic projections thereof; we also contrast their relative accessibility and utility to different avenues of biological inquiry. The variety of network architectures and parameters tested performed similarly, ∼80% IoU for the genus Porites, suggesting that the primary limitations to an automated workflow are 1) the current capabilities of neural network technology, and 2) consistency and quality control in image product collection and human training/testing dataset generation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9197210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91972102022-06-15 Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections Runyan, Hugh Petrovic, Vid Edwards, Clinton B. Pedersen, Nicole Alcantar, Esmeralda Kuester, Falko Sandin, Stuart A. Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models, allow researchers to study a comprehensive digital twin of their field sites. Spatio-temporally located twins can be compared and annotated, enabling researchers to virtually return to sites long after they have left them. While these new data expand the variety and specificity of biological investigation that can be pursued, they have introduced the much-discussed Big Data Problem: research labs lack the human and computational resources required to process and analyze imagery at the rate it can be collected. The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles suggests researchers will soon have access to an even greater volume of imagery and other sensor measurements than can be collected by diver-piloted platforms, further exacerbating data handling limitations. Thoroughly segmenting (tracing the extent of and taxonomically identifying) organisms enables researchers to extract the information image products contain, but is very time-consuming. Analytic techniques driven by neural networks offer the possibility that the segmentation process can be greatly accelerated through automation. In this study, we examine the efficacy of automated segmentation on three different image-derived data products: 3D models, and 2D and 2.5D orthographic projections thereof; we also contrast their relative accessibility and utility to different avenues of biological inquiry. The variety of network architectures and parameters tested performed similarly, ∼80% IoU for the genus Porites, suggesting that the primary limitations to an automated workflow are 1) the current capabilities of neural network technology, and 2) consistency and quality control in image product collection and human training/testing dataset generation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9197210/ /pubmed/35712550 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.884317 Text en Copyright © 2022 Runyan, Petrovic, Edwards, Pedersen, Alcantar, Kuester and Sandin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Robotics and AI Runyan, Hugh Petrovic, Vid Edwards, Clinton B. Pedersen, Nicole Alcantar, Esmeralda Kuester, Falko Sandin, Stuart A. Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections |
title | Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections |
title_full | Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections |
title_fullStr | Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections |
title_short | Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections |
title_sort | automated 2d, 2.5d, and 3d segmentation of coral reef pointclouds and orthoprojections |
topic | Robotics and AI |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35712550 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.884317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT runyanhugh automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections AT petrovicvid automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections AT edwardsclintonb automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections AT pedersennicole automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections AT alcantaresmeralda automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections AT kuesterfalko automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections AT sandinstuarta automated2d25dand3dsegmentationofcoralreefpointcloudsandorthoprojections |