Cargando…
Nudges for Judges: An Experiment on the Effect of Making Sentencing Costs Explicit
Judges are typically tasked to consider sentencing benefits but not costs. Previous research finds that both laypeople and prosecutors discount the costs of incarceration when forming sentencing attitudes, raising important questions about whether professional judges show the same bias during senten...
Autores principales: | Aharoni, Eyal, Kleider-Offutt, Heather M., Brosnan, Sarah F., Hoffman, Morris B. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35712212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889933 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Slippery scales: Cost prompts, but not benefit prompts, modulate sentencing recommendations in laypeople
por: Aharoni, Eyal, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Correctional “Free Lunch”? Cost Neglect Increases Punishment in Prosecutors
por: Aharoni, Eyal, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Explicit (Not Implicit) Attitudes Mediate the Focus of Attention During Sentence Processing
por: Horchak, Oleksandr V., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A study of auxiliary factors for judges in sentencing dangerous driving offenses – the mediating role of favorable and unfavorable factors
por: Liu, Chengjie, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications
por: Watamura, Eiichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022)