Cargando…

Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop and test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) eliciting public and patient preferences for better-coordinated care in Switzerland. METHODS: We applied a multistage mixed-methods procedure using qualitative and quantitative approaches. First, to identify attribut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicolet, Anna, Perraudin, Clémence, Wagner, Joël, Gilles, Ingrid, Krucien, Nicolas, Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle, Marti, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2
_version_ 1784727494933348352
author Nicolet, Anna
Perraudin, Clémence
Wagner, Joël
Gilles, Ingrid
Krucien, Nicolas
Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
Marti, Joachim
author_facet Nicolet, Anna
Perraudin, Clémence
Wagner, Joël
Gilles, Ingrid
Krucien, Nicolas
Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
Marti, Joachim
author_sort Nicolet, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop and test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) eliciting public and patient preferences for better-coordinated care in Switzerland. METHODS: We applied a multistage mixed-methods procedure using qualitative and quantitative approaches. First, to identify attributes, we performed a review of the DCE literature in healthcare with a focus on chronic care. Next, attribute selection involved stakeholders (N = 7) from various healthcare sectors to select the most relevant and actionable attributes, followed by three organized focus groups involving the general public and patients (N = 21) to verify the selection and the clarity of the DCE tasks and explanations. Finally, we conducted an online pilot in the target population to test the survey and obtain priors for a final six tested attributes to refine the final design of the experiment. RESULTS: After identifying an initial 33 attributes, a final list of six attributes was selected following stakeholder involvement and the three focus groups involving the target population. At the online pilot-testing stage with 301 participants, the majority of respondents found the DCE choice tasks socially relevant for Switzerland but challenging. The quality of the answers was relatively high. Most attributes had signs matching those in the literature and focus group discussions. CONCLUSION: This article will be useful to researchers designing DCEs from a broad health policy perspective. The multistage approach involving a range of stakeholders was essential for the development of a DCE that is relevant for policy makers and well-accepted by the general public and patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9197802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91978022022-06-16 Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment Nicolet, Anna Perraudin, Clémence Wagner, Joël Gilles, Ingrid Krucien, Nicolas Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle Marti, Joachim Patient Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop and test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) eliciting public and patient preferences for better-coordinated care in Switzerland. METHODS: We applied a multistage mixed-methods procedure using qualitative and quantitative approaches. First, to identify attributes, we performed a review of the DCE literature in healthcare with a focus on chronic care. Next, attribute selection involved stakeholders (N = 7) from various healthcare sectors to select the most relevant and actionable attributes, followed by three organized focus groups involving the general public and patients (N = 21) to verify the selection and the clarity of the DCE tasks and explanations. Finally, we conducted an online pilot in the target population to test the survey and obtain priors for a final six tested attributes to refine the final design of the experiment. RESULTS: After identifying an initial 33 attributes, a final list of six attributes was selected following stakeholder involvement and the three focus groups involving the target population. At the online pilot-testing stage with 301 participants, the majority of respondents found the DCE choice tasks socially relevant for Switzerland but challenging. The quality of the answers was relatively high. Most attributes had signs matching those in the literature and focus group discussions. CONCLUSION: This article will be useful to researchers designing DCEs from a broad health policy perspective. The multistage approach involving a range of stakeholders was essential for the development of a DCE that is relevant for policy makers and well-accepted by the general public and patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9197802/ /pubmed/35067858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Nicolet, Anna
Perraudin, Clémence
Wagner, Joël
Gilles, Ingrid
Krucien, Nicolas
Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
Marti, Joachim
Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
title Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
title_fullStr Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
title_short Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
title_sort patient and public preferences for coordinated care in switzerland: development of a discrete choice experiment
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoletanna patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT perraudinclemence patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT wagnerjoel patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT gillesingrid patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT kruciennicolas patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT peytremannbridevauxisabelle patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT martijoachim patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment