Cargando…
Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop and test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) eliciting public and patient preferences for better-coordinated care in Switzerland. METHODS: We applied a multistage mixed-methods procedure using qualitative and quantitative approaches. First, to identify attribut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2 |
_version_ | 1784727494933348352 |
---|---|
author | Nicolet, Anna Perraudin, Clémence Wagner, Joël Gilles, Ingrid Krucien, Nicolas Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle Marti, Joachim |
author_facet | Nicolet, Anna Perraudin, Clémence Wagner, Joël Gilles, Ingrid Krucien, Nicolas Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle Marti, Joachim |
author_sort | Nicolet, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop and test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) eliciting public and patient preferences for better-coordinated care in Switzerland. METHODS: We applied a multistage mixed-methods procedure using qualitative and quantitative approaches. First, to identify attributes, we performed a review of the DCE literature in healthcare with a focus on chronic care. Next, attribute selection involved stakeholders (N = 7) from various healthcare sectors to select the most relevant and actionable attributes, followed by three organized focus groups involving the general public and patients (N = 21) to verify the selection and the clarity of the DCE tasks and explanations. Finally, we conducted an online pilot in the target population to test the survey and obtain priors for a final six tested attributes to refine the final design of the experiment. RESULTS: After identifying an initial 33 attributes, a final list of six attributes was selected following stakeholder involvement and the three focus groups involving the target population. At the online pilot-testing stage with 301 participants, the majority of respondents found the DCE choice tasks socially relevant for Switzerland but challenging. The quality of the answers was relatively high. Most attributes had signs matching those in the literature and focus group discussions. CONCLUSION: This article will be useful to researchers designing DCEs from a broad health policy perspective. The multistage approach involving a range of stakeholders was essential for the development of a DCE that is relevant for policy makers and well-accepted by the general public and patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9197802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91978022022-06-16 Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment Nicolet, Anna Perraudin, Clémence Wagner, Joël Gilles, Ingrid Krucien, Nicolas Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle Marti, Joachim Patient Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop and test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) eliciting public and patient preferences for better-coordinated care in Switzerland. METHODS: We applied a multistage mixed-methods procedure using qualitative and quantitative approaches. First, to identify attributes, we performed a review of the DCE literature in healthcare with a focus on chronic care. Next, attribute selection involved stakeholders (N = 7) from various healthcare sectors to select the most relevant and actionable attributes, followed by three organized focus groups involving the general public and patients (N = 21) to verify the selection and the clarity of the DCE tasks and explanations. Finally, we conducted an online pilot in the target population to test the survey and obtain priors for a final six tested attributes to refine the final design of the experiment. RESULTS: After identifying an initial 33 attributes, a final list of six attributes was selected following stakeholder involvement and the three focus groups involving the target population. At the online pilot-testing stage with 301 participants, the majority of respondents found the DCE choice tasks socially relevant for Switzerland but challenging. The quality of the answers was relatively high. Most attributes had signs matching those in the literature and focus group discussions. CONCLUSION: This article will be useful to researchers designing DCEs from a broad health policy perspective. The multistage approach involving a range of stakeholders was essential for the development of a DCE that is relevant for policy makers and well-accepted by the general public and patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9197802/ /pubmed/35067858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Nicolet, Anna Perraudin, Clémence Wagner, Joël Gilles, Ingrid Krucien, Nicolas Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle Marti, Joachim Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment |
title | Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_full | Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_fullStr | Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_short | Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_sort | patient and public preferences for coordinated care in switzerland: development of a discrete choice experiment |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nicoletanna patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT perraudinclemence patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT wagnerjoel patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT gillesingrid patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT kruciennicolas patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT peytremannbridevauxisabelle patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT martijoachim patientandpublicpreferencesforcoordinatedcareinswitzerlanddevelopmentofadiscretechoiceexperiment |