Cargando…
Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making
Juries in adversarial courts are tasked with several responsibilities. They are asked to: 1) assess the credibility and reliability of the evidence presented; 2) deliberate; 3) and then reach a decision. Jurors are expected to evaluate said evidence in a rational/impartial manner, thus allowing the...
Autores principales: | Curley, Lee J., Munro, James, Dror, Itiel E. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9198394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35175157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00258024221080655 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Culture in the Courtroom: Ethnocentrism and Juror Decision-Making
por: Maeder, Evelyn M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Social cognitive processes explain bias in juror decisions
por: Castrellon, Jaime J, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Verdict spotting: investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors and verdict system in jurors
por: Curley, Lee J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
por: Baker, James, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The effect of contextual information on decision-making in forensic toxicology
por: Hamnett, Hilary J., et al.
Publicado: (2020)