Cargando…
A dPCR-NIPT assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool?
BACKGROUND: The next generation sequencing (NGS) based non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) has outplayed the traditional serum biochemical tests (SBT) in screen of fetal aneuploidies with a high sensitivity and specificity. However, it has not been widely used as a primary screen tool due to its high...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9198625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03455-y |
_version_ | 1784727667841433600 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Peng Yang, Yanfeng Zhao, Ganye Gu, Zhiqiang Ren, Huanan Hu, Shuang Liu, Ning Jiao, Weimeng Li, Jinfang Kong, Xiangdong |
author_facet | Dai, Peng Yang, Yanfeng Zhao, Ganye Gu, Zhiqiang Ren, Huanan Hu, Shuang Liu, Ning Jiao, Weimeng Li, Jinfang Kong, Xiangdong |
author_sort | Dai, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The next generation sequencing (NGS) based non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) has outplayed the traditional serum biochemical tests (SBT) in screen of fetal aneuploidies with a high sensitivity and specificity. However, it has not been widely used as a primary screen tool due to its high cost and the cheaper SBT is still the choice for primary screen even with well-known shortages in sensitivity and specificity. Here, we report a multiplex droplet digital PCR NIPT (dPCR-NIPT) assay that can detect trisomies 21, 18 and 13 (T21, T18 and T13) in a single tube reaction with a better sensitivity and specificity than the SBT and a much cheaper price than the NGS-NIPT. METHODS: In this study, the dPCR-NIPT assay’s non-clinical characteristics were evaluated to verify the cell free fetal DNA (cffDNA) fraction enrichment efficiencies, the target cell free DNA (cfDNA) concentration enrichment, the analytical sensitivity, and the sample quality control on the minimum concentration of cfDNA required for the assay. We validated the clinical performance for this assay by blindly testing 283 clinical maternal plasma samples, including 36 trisomic positive samples, from high risk pregnancies to access its sensitivity and specificity. The cost effectiveness of using the dPCR-NIPT assay as the primary screen tool was also analyzed and compared to that of the existing contingent strategy (CS) using the SBT as the primary screen tool and the strategy of NGS-NIPT as the first-tier screen tool in a simulating situation. RESULTS: For the non-clinical characteristics, the sample processing reagents could enrich the cffDNA fraction by around 2 folds, and the analytical sensitivity showed that the assay was able to detect trisomies at a cffDNA fraction as low as 5% and the extracted cfDNA concentration as low as 0.2 ng/μL. By testing the 283 clinical samples, the dPCR-NIPT assay demonstrated a detection sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95.12%. Compared to the existing CS and the NGS-NIPT as the first-tier screen strategy, dPCR-NIPT assay used as a primary screen tool followed by the NGS-NIPT rescreen is the most economical approach to screen pregnant women for fetal aneuploidies without sacrificing the positive detection rate. CONCLUSION: This is the first report on a dPCR-NIPT assay, consisting of all the necessary reagents from sample processing to multiplex dPCR amplification, can detect T21, T18 and T13 in a single tube reaction. The study results reveal that this assay has a sensitivity and specificity superior to the SBT and a cost much lower than the NGS-NIPT. Thus, from both the test performance and the economic benefit points of views, using the dPCR-NIPT assay to replace the SBT as a primary screen tool followed by the NGS-NIPT rescreen would be a better approach than the existing CS for detection of fetal aneuploidies in maternal plasma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-022-03455-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9198625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91986252022-06-16 A dPCR-NIPT assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool? Dai, Peng Yang, Yanfeng Zhao, Ganye Gu, Zhiqiang Ren, Huanan Hu, Shuang Liu, Ning Jiao, Weimeng Li, Jinfang Kong, Xiangdong J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: The next generation sequencing (NGS) based non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) has outplayed the traditional serum biochemical tests (SBT) in screen of fetal aneuploidies with a high sensitivity and specificity. However, it has not been widely used as a primary screen tool due to its high cost and the cheaper SBT is still the choice for primary screen even with well-known shortages in sensitivity and specificity. Here, we report a multiplex droplet digital PCR NIPT (dPCR-NIPT) assay that can detect trisomies 21, 18 and 13 (T21, T18 and T13) in a single tube reaction with a better sensitivity and specificity than the SBT and a much cheaper price than the NGS-NIPT. METHODS: In this study, the dPCR-NIPT assay’s non-clinical characteristics were evaluated to verify the cell free fetal DNA (cffDNA) fraction enrichment efficiencies, the target cell free DNA (cfDNA) concentration enrichment, the analytical sensitivity, and the sample quality control on the minimum concentration of cfDNA required for the assay. We validated the clinical performance for this assay by blindly testing 283 clinical maternal plasma samples, including 36 trisomic positive samples, from high risk pregnancies to access its sensitivity and specificity. The cost effectiveness of using the dPCR-NIPT assay as the primary screen tool was also analyzed and compared to that of the existing contingent strategy (CS) using the SBT as the primary screen tool and the strategy of NGS-NIPT as the first-tier screen tool in a simulating situation. RESULTS: For the non-clinical characteristics, the sample processing reagents could enrich the cffDNA fraction by around 2 folds, and the analytical sensitivity showed that the assay was able to detect trisomies at a cffDNA fraction as low as 5% and the extracted cfDNA concentration as low as 0.2 ng/μL. By testing the 283 clinical samples, the dPCR-NIPT assay demonstrated a detection sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95.12%. Compared to the existing CS and the NGS-NIPT as the first-tier screen strategy, dPCR-NIPT assay used as a primary screen tool followed by the NGS-NIPT rescreen is the most economical approach to screen pregnant women for fetal aneuploidies without sacrificing the positive detection rate. CONCLUSION: This is the first report on a dPCR-NIPT assay, consisting of all the necessary reagents from sample processing to multiplex dPCR amplification, can detect T21, T18 and T13 in a single tube reaction. The study results reveal that this assay has a sensitivity and specificity superior to the SBT and a cost much lower than the NGS-NIPT. Thus, from both the test performance and the economic benefit points of views, using the dPCR-NIPT assay to replace the SBT as a primary screen tool followed by the NGS-NIPT rescreen would be a better approach than the existing CS for detection of fetal aneuploidies in maternal plasma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-022-03455-y. BioMed Central 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9198625/ /pubmed/35706031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03455-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dai, Peng Yang, Yanfeng Zhao, Ganye Gu, Zhiqiang Ren, Huanan Hu, Shuang Liu, Ning Jiao, Weimeng Li, Jinfang Kong, Xiangdong A dPCR-NIPT assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool? |
title | A dPCR-NIPT assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool? |
title_full | A dPCR-NIPT assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool? |
title_fullStr | A dPCR-NIPT assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool? |
title_full_unstemmed | A dPCR-NIPT assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool? |
title_short | A dPCR-NIPT assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool? |
title_sort | dpcr-nipt assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9198625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03455-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daipeng adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT yangyanfeng adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT zhaoganye adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT guzhiqiang adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT renhuanan adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT hushuang adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT liuning adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT jiaoweimeng adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT lijinfang adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT kongxiangdong adpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT daipeng dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT yangyanfeng dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT zhaoganye dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT guzhiqiang dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT renhuanan dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT hushuang dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT liuning dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT jiaoweimeng dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT lijinfang dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool AT kongxiangdong dpcrniptassayfordetectionsoftrisomies2118and13inasingletubereactioncoulditreplaceserumbiochemicaltestsasaprimarymaternalplasmascreeningtool |