Cargando…
The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study
BACKGROUND: The insertion of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a frequent procedure during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) to facilitate kidney stone treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of 12/14 French (F) UAS on fURS outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01031-6 |
_version_ | 1784727789153288192 |
---|---|
author | Ozimek, Tomasz Wiessmeyer, Judith R. Struck, Julian P. Roesch, Marie C. Gilbert, Nils Laturnus, Jan M. Merseburger, Axel S. Kramer, Mario W. |
author_facet | Ozimek, Tomasz Wiessmeyer, Judith R. Struck, Julian P. Roesch, Marie C. Gilbert, Nils Laturnus, Jan M. Merseburger, Axel S. Kramer, Mario W. |
author_sort | Ozimek, Tomasz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The insertion of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a frequent procedure during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) to facilitate kidney stone treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of 12/14 French (F) UAS on fURS outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of fURS procedures conducted at the Department of Urology (University Hospital Schleswig–Holstein, Lübeck, Germany) for kidney stone treatment via lithotripsy or basket stone retrieval between September 2013 and June 2017. Uni- and multivariate analyses were done with the help of RStudio (Version 1.0.136) software. RESULTS: In total, 283 consecutive fURS were analyzed. UAS was applied in 98 cases (34.63%). The insertion of UAS was preferred in cases with multiple kidney stones and larger median maximal stone diameter (p < 0.05). UAS usage correlated with elevated radiation exposure in seconds (94 vs. 61; p < 0.0001), prolonged operation time in minutes (99 vs. 66, p < 0.0001), length of hospital stay over 48 h (LOS, 22.49% vs. 10.81%; p = 0.015), more frequent postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS, 13.27% vs. 4.32%; p = 0.013) and lower postoperative stone-free rates (60.20% vs. 78.92%; p = 0.0013). Moreover, we conducted uni- and multivariate subgroup analysis for cases with multiple kidney stones (≥ 2) and comparable stone burden; UAS was inserted in 48.3% of these cases (71/147). On multivariate logistic regression, UAS insertion was statistically associated with prolonged operation time in minutes (101 vs. 77; p = 0.004). No statistical differences regarding radiation exposure, stone-free rates, postoperative SIRS rates or LOS were noted between UAS and non-UAS patients with multiple kidney stones of similar size (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 12/14F UAS does not seem to improve overall outcomes in fURS for kidney stones. In patients with multiple kidney stones it may be associated with elevated operation time without a clear benefit in terms of improved stone-free status or reduced perioperative complication rate. Further prospective randomized studies to specify the indications for UAS usage are urgently needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9199145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91991452022-06-16 The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study Ozimek, Tomasz Wiessmeyer, Judith R. Struck, Julian P. Roesch, Marie C. Gilbert, Nils Laturnus, Jan M. Merseburger, Axel S. Kramer, Mario W. BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: The insertion of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a frequent procedure during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) to facilitate kidney stone treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of 12/14 French (F) UAS on fURS outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of fURS procedures conducted at the Department of Urology (University Hospital Schleswig–Holstein, Lübeck, Germany) for kidney stone treatment via lithotripsy or basket stone retrieval between September 2013 and June 2017. Uni- and multivariate analyses were done with the help of RStudio (Version 1.0.136) software. RESULTS: In total, 283 consecutive fURS were analyzed. UAS was applied in 98 cases (34.63%). The insertion of UAS was preferred in cases with multiple kidney stones and larger median maximal stone diameter (p < 0.05). UAS usage correlated with elevated radiation exposure in seconds (94 vs. 61; p < 0.0001), prolonged operation time in minutes (99 vs. 66, p < 0.0001), length of hospital stay over 48 h (LOS, 22.49% vs. 10.81%; p = 0.015), more frequent postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS, 13.27% vs. 4.32%; p = 0.013) and lower postoperative stone-free rates (60.20% vs. 78.92%; p = 0.0013). Moreover, we conducted uni- and multivariate subgroup analysis for cases with multiple kidney stones (≥ 2) and comparable stone burden; UAS was inserted in 48.3% of these cases (71/147). On multivariate logistic regression, UAS insertion was statistically associated with prolonged operation time in minutes (101 vs. 77; p = 0.004). No statistical differences regarding radiation exposure, stone-free rates, postoperative SIRS rates or LOS were noted between UAS and non-UAS patients with multiple kidney stones of similar size (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 12/14F UAS does not seem to improve overall outcomes in fURS for kidney stones. In patients with multiple kidney stones it may be associated with elevated operation time without a clear benefit in terms of improved stone-free status or reduced perioperative complication rate. Further prospective randomized studies to specify the indications for UAS usage are urgently needed. BioMed Central 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9199145/ /pubmed/35705924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01031-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ozimek, Tomasz Wiessmeyer, Judith R. Struck, Julian P. Roesch, Marie C. Gilbert, Nils Laturnus, Jan M. Merseburger, Axel S. Kramer, Mario W. The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study |
title | The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study |
title_full | The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study |
title_fullStr | The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study |
title_full_unstemmed | The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study |
title_short | The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study |
title_sort | dilemma of 12/14f ureteral access sheath (uas) usage: a case control study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01031-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozimektomasz thedilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT wiessmeyerjudithr thedilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT struckjulianp thedilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT roeschmariec thedilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT gilbertnils thedilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT laturnusjanm thedilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT merseburgeraxels thedilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT kramermariow thedilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT ozimektomasz dilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT wiessmeyerjudithr dilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT struckjulianp dilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT roeschmariec dilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT gilbertnils dilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT laturnusjanm dilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT merseburgeraxels dilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy AT kramermariow dilemmaof1214fureteralaccesssheathuasusageacasecontrolstudy |