Cargando…

Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To explore parents’ perceptions of an upper extremity (UE) intervention using functional electrical stimulation (FES) for young children with hemiparesis. METHODS: Parents of children aged 3–6 years with a history of perinatal stroke, impaired UE function, and participation in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swaffield, Emma, Yang, Jaynie F., Manns, Patricia, Chan, Katherine, Musselman, Kristin E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03403-1
_version_ 1784727820021268480
author Swaffield, Emma
Yang, Jaynie F.
Manns, Patricia
Chan, Katherine
Musselman, Kristin E.
author_facet Swaffield, Emma
Yang, Jaynie F.
Manns, Patricia
Chan, Katherine
Musselman, Kristin E.
author_sort Swaffield, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To explore parents’ perceptions of an upper extremity (UE) intervention using functional electrical stimulation (FES) for young children with hemiparesis. METHODS: Parents of children aged 3–6 years with a history of perinatal stroke, impaired UE function, and participation in a 12-week FES intervention delivered at a hospital were included in this exploratory qualitative study. Nine mothers participated in a semi-structured interview < 1 week after their child completed the FES intervention (MyndMove®, MyndTec Inc.) targeting the hemiparetic UE. Open-ended questions queried parents’ goals, perceived benefits, and challenges of the FES intervention. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative conventional content analysis was used to analyze the transcripts. RESULTS: Five themes were identified. 1) Parents’ expectations for the FES intervention. Mothers described setting functional, exploratory, and realistic goals, yet feeling initial apprehension towards FES. 2) Perceived improvement. Physical, functional, and psychological improvements were observed with FES; however, there was still room for improvement. 3) Factors influencing the FES intervention. Program structure, therapist factors, and child factors influenced perceived success. 4) Lack of access to intensive therapy. Mothers noted that FES is not provided in mainstream therapy; however, they wanted access to FES outside of the study. They also highlighted socioeconomic challenges to accessing FES. 5) Strategies to facilitate participation. The mothers provided suggestions for program structure and delivery, and session delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers perceived the FES intervention to have physical, functional and psychological benefits for their children. Interest in continuing with FES highlights a need to improve access to this therapy for young children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9199325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91993252022-06-17 Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers Swaffield, Emma Yang, Jaynie F. Manns, Patricia Chan, Katherine Musselman, Kristin E. BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To explore parents’ perceptions of an upper extremity (UE) intervention using functional electrical stimulation (FES) for young children with hemiparesis. METHODS: Parents of children aged 3–6 years with a history of perinatal stroke, impaired UE function, and participation in a 12-week FES intervention delivered at a hospital were included in this exploratory qualitative study. Nine mothers participated in a semi-structured interview < 1 week after their child completed the FES intervention (MyndMove®, MyndTec Inc.) targeting the hemiparetic UE. Open-ended questions queried parents’ goals, perceived benefits, and challenges of the FES intervention. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative conventional content analysis was used to analyze the transcripts. RESULTS: Five themes were identified. 1) Parents’ expectations for the FES intervention. Mothers described setting functional, exploratory, and realistic goals, yet feeling initial apprehension towards FES. 2) Perceived improvement. Physical, functional, and psychological improvements were observed with FES; however, there was still room for improvement. 3) Factors influencing the FES intervention. Program structure, therapist factors, and child factors influenced perceived success. 4) Lack of access to intensive therapy. Mothers noted that FES is not provided in mainstream therapy; however, they wanted access to FES outside of the study. They also highlighted socioeconomic challenges to accessing FES. 5) Strategies to facilitate participation. The mothers provided suggestions for program structure and delivery, and session delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers perceived the FES intervention to have physical, functional and psychological benefits for their children. Interest in continuing with FES highlights a need to improve access to this therapy for young children. BioMed Central 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9199325/ /pubmed/35705938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03403-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Swaffield, Emma
Yang, Jaynie F.
Manns, Patricia
Chan, Katherine
Musselman, Kristin E.
Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers
title Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers
title_full Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers
title_fullStr Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers
title_full_unstemmed Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers
title_short Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers
title_sort parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03403-1
work_keys_str_mv AT swaffieldemma parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers
AT yangjaynief parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers
AT mannspatricia parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers
AT chankatherine parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers
AT musselmankristine parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers