Cargando…
Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To explore parents’ perceptions of an upper extremity (UE) intervention using functional electrical stimulation (FES) for young children with hemiparesis. METHODS: Parents of children aged 3–6 years with a history of perinatal stroke, impaired UE function, and participation in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03403-1 |
_version_ | 1784727820021268480 |
---|---|
author | Swaffield, Emma Yang, Jaynie F. Manns, Patricia Chan, Katherine Musselman, Kristin E. |
author_facet | Swaffield, Emma Yang, Jaynie F. Manns, Patricia Chan, Katherine Musselman, Kristin E. |
author_sort | Swaffield, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To explore parents’ perceptions of an upper extremity (UE) intervention using functional electrical stimulation (FES) for young children with hemiparesis. METHODS: Parents of children aged 3–6 years with a history of perinatal stroke, impaired UE function, and participation in a 12-week FES intervention delivered at a hospital were included in this exploratory qualitative study. Nine mothers participated in a semi-structured interview < 1 week after their child completed the FES intervention (MyndMove®, MyndTec Inc.) targeting the hemiparetic UE. Open-ended questions queried parents’ goals, perceived benefits, and challenges of the FES intervention. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative conventional content analysis was used to analyze the transcripts. RESULTS: Five themes were identified. 1) Parents’ expectations for the FES intervention. Mothers described setting functional, exploratory, and realistic goals, yet feeling initial apprehension towards FES. 2) Perceived improvement. Physical, functional, and psychological improvements were observed with FES; however, there was still room for improvement. 3) Factors influencing the FES intervention. Program structure, therapist factors, and child factors influenced perceived success. 4) Lack of access to intensive therapy. Mothers noted that FES is not provided in mainstream therapy; however, they wanted access to FES outside of the study. They also highlighted socioeconomic challenges to accessing FES. 5) Strategies to facilitate participation. The mothers provided suggestions for program structure and delivery, and session delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers perceived the FES intervention to have physical, functional and psychological benefits for their children. Interest in continuing with FES highlights a need to improve access to this therapy for young children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9199325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91993252022-06-17 Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers Swaffield, Emma Yang, Jaynie F. Manns, Patricia Chan, Katherine Musselman, Kristin E. BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To explore parents’ perceptions of an upper extremity (UE) intervention using functional electrical stimulation (FES) for young children with hemiparesis. METHODS: Parents of children aged 3–6 years with a history of perinatal stroke, impaired UE function, and participation in a 12-week FES intervention delivered at a hospital were included in this exploratory qualitative study. Nine mothers participated in a semi-structured interview < 1 week after their child completed the FES intervention (MyndMove®, MyndTec Inc.) targeting the hemiparetic UE. Open-ended questions queried parents’ goals, perceived benefits, and challenges of the FES intervention. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative conventional content analysis was used to analyze the transcripts. RESULTS: Five themes were identified. 1) Parents’ expectations for the FES intervention. Mothers described setting functional, exploratory, and realistic goals, yet feeling initial apprehension towards FES. 2) Perceived improvement. Physical, functional, and psychological improvements were observed with FES; however, there was still room for improvement. 3) Factors influencing the FES intervention. Program structure, therapist factors, and child factors influenced perceived success. 4) Lack of access to intensive therapy. Mothers noted that FES is not provided in mainstream therapy; however, they wanted access to FES outside of the study. They also highlighted socioeconomic challenges to accessing FES. 5) Strategies to facilitate participation. The mothers provided suggestions for program structure and delivery, and session delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers perceived the FES intervention to have physical, functional and psychological benefits for their children. Interest in continuing with FES highlights a need to improve access to this therapy for young children. BioMed Central 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9199325/ /pubmed/35705938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03403-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Swaffield, Emma Yang, Jaynie F. Manns, Patricia Chan, Katherine Musselman, Kristin E. Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers |
title | Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers |
title_full | Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers |
title_fullStr | Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers |
title_full_unstemmed | Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers |
title_short | Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers |
title_sort | parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03403-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swaffieldemma parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers AT yangjaynief parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers AT mannspatricia parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers AT chankatherine parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers AT musselmankristine parentsperceptionsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationasanupperlimbinterventionforyoungchildrenwithhemiparesisqualitativeinterviewswithmothers |