Cargando…

Systematic Review of Existing Stroke Guidelines: Case for a Change

METHODS: We systematically searched for guideline recommendation on the day-to-day use of peripheral inflammatory markers such as NLR published in the English language between January 1, 2005, and October 2020. Any other evidence of system biology-based approach or recommendation was explored within...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijeratne, Tissa, Sales, Carmela, Wijeratne, Chanith, Karimi, Leila, Jakovljevic, Mihajlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5514793
_version_ 1784727859080724480
author Wijeratne, Tissa
Sales, Carmela
Wijeratne, Chanith
Karimi, Leila
Jakovljevic, Mihajlo
author_facet Wijeratne, Tissa
Sales, Carmela
Wijeratne, Chanith
Karimi, Leila
Jakovljevic, Mihajlo
author_sort Wijeratne, Tissa
collection PubMed
description METHODS: We systematically searched for guideline recommendation on the day-to-day use of peripheral inflammatory markers such as NLR published in the English language between January 1, 2005, and October 2020. Any other evidence of system biology-based approach or recommendation was explored within the selected guidelines for this scoping review. Only the latest guideline per writing group was selected. Each guideline was analyzed independently by 2 to 4 authors to determine clinical scenarios explained/given, scientific evidence used, and recommendations presented in the context of system biology. RESULTS: The scoping review found 2,911 titles at the beginning of the search. Final review included with 15 guidelines. Stroke-related organizations wrote sixty-five percent of the guidelines while national ministries wrote a fewer number of guidelines. We were primarily interested in recommendations for acute management in AIS published in the English language. Fifteen eligible guidelines were identified from 15 different countries/regions. None of the guidelines recommended the routine use of peripheral markers of inflammation, such as NLR, among their acute assessment and management recommendations. None of the existing guidelines explored the system biology approach to one of the most complex diseases affecting the human brain, stroke. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review has identified a significant evidence-practice gap in all existing national stroke guidelines published in English medium as of October 2020. These guidelines included the only current “living stroke guidelines,” stroke guidelines from Australia with a real opportunity to modernize the living stroke guidelines with systems biology approach, and provide 2020 vision towards better stroke care globally. Investigation of complex disease such as stroke is best served through a systems biology approach. One of the easiest places to start is simple blood tests such as total white cell count and NLR. Systems biology approach point us towards simple tools such immune-inflammatory index (SII) and serial systemic immune inflammatory indices (SSIIi) which should pave the way for the stroke physician community address the challenges in systems biology approach in stroke care. These challenges include translating bench research to the bedside, managing big data (continuous pulse, blood pressure, sleep, oxygen saturation, progressive changes in NLR, SII, SSIIi, etc.). Working with an interdisciplinary team also provides a distinct advantage. Recent adoption of historic WHO-IGAP calls for immediate action. The 2022 World Brain Day campaign on Brain Health for All is the perfect opportunity to raise awareness and start the process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9199531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91995312022-06-16 Systematic Review of Existing Stroke Guidelines: Case for a Change Wijeratne, Tissa Sales, Carmela Wijeratne, Chanith Karimi, Leila Jakovljevic, Mihajlo Biomed Res Int Review Article METHODS: We systematically searched for guideline recommendation on the day-to-day use of peripheral inflammatory markers such as NLR published in the English language between January 1, 2005, and October 2020. Any other evidence of system biology-based approach or recommendation was explored within the selected guidelines for this scoping review. Only the latest guideline per writing group was selected. Each guideline was analyzed independently by 2 to 4 authors to determine clinical scenarios explained/given, scientific evidence used, and recommendations presented in the context of system biology. RESULTS: The scoping review found 2,911 titles at the beginning of the search. Final review included with 15 guidelines. Stroke-related organizations wrote sixty-five percent of the guidelines while national ministries wrote a fewer number of guidelines. We were primarily interested in recommendations for acute management in AIS published in the English language. Fifteen eligible guidelines were identified from 15 different countries/regions. None of the guidelines recommended the routine use of peripheral markers of inflammation, such as NLR, among their acute assessment and management recommendations. None of the existing guidelines explored the system biology approach to one of the most complex diseases affecting the human brain, stroke. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review has identified a significant evidence-practice gap in all existing national stroke guidelines published in English medium as of October 2020. These guidelines included the only current “living stroke guidelines,” stroke guidelines from Australia with a real opportunity to modernize the living stroke guidelines with systems biology approach, and provide 2020 vision towards better stroke care globally. Investigation of complex disease such as stroke is best served through a systems biology approach. One of the easiest places to start is simple blood tests such as total white cell count and NLR. Systems biology approach point us towards simple tools such immune-inflammatory index (SII) and serial systemic immune inflammatory indices (SSIIi) which should pave the way for the stroke physician community address the challenges in systems biology approach in stroke care. These challenges include translating bench research to the bedside, managing big data (continuous pulse, blood pressure, sleep, oxygen saturation, progressive changes in NLR, SII, SSIIi, etc.). Working with an interdisciplinary team also provides a distinct advantage. Recent adoption of historic WHO-IGAP calls for immediate action. The 2022 World Brain Day campaign on Brain Health for All is the perfect opportunity to raise awareness and start the process. Hindawi 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9199531/ /pubmed/35722461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5514793 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tissa Wijeratne et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wijeratne, Tissa
Sales, Carmela
Wijeratne, Chanith
Karimi, Leila
Jakovljevic, Mihajlo
Systematic Review of Existing Stroke Guidelines: Case for a Change
title Systematic Review of Existing Stroke Guidelines: Case for a Change
title_full Systematic Review of Existing Stroke Guidelines: Case for a Change
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Existing Stroke Guidelines: Case for a Change
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Existing Stroke Guidelines: Case for a Change
title_short Systematic Review of Existing Stroke Guidelines: Case for a Change
title_sort systematic review of existing stroke guidelines: case for a change
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5514793
work_keys_str_mv AT wijeratnetissa systematicreviewofexistingstrokeguidelinescaseforachange
AT salescarmela systematicreviewofexistingstrokeguidelinescaseforachange
AT wijeratnechanith systematicreviewofexistingstrokeguidelinescaseforachange
AT karimileila systematicreviewofexistingstrokeguidelinescaseforachange
AT jakovljevicmihajlo systematicreviewofexistingstrokeguidelinescaseforachange