Cargando…

Screw Insertion Time, Fluoroscopy Time, and Operation Time for Robotic-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Compared With Freehand Technique

Introduction The purpose of this study was to clarify the superiority of robotic-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement in terms of screw insertion time, fluoroscopy time, and operation time. Methods The subjects were 46 patients who underwent a posterior lumbar interbody fusion with an open proced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torii, Yoshiaki, Ueno, Jun, Umehara, Tasuku, Iinuma, Masahiro, Yoshida, Atsuhiro, Tomochika, Ken, Niki, Hisateru, Akazawa, Tsutomu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719818
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25039
_version_ 1784727867737767936
author Torii, Yoshiaki
Ueno, Jun
Umehara, Tasuku
Iinuma, Masahiro
Yoshida, Atsuhiro
Tomochika, Ken
Niki, Hisateru
Akazawa, Tsutomu
author_facet Torii, Yoshiaki
Ueno, Jun
Umehara, Tasuku
Iinuma, Masahiro
Yoshida, Atsuhiro
Tomochika, Ken
Niki, Hisateru
Akazawa, Tsutomu
author_sort Torii, Yoshiaki
collection PubMed
description Introduction The purpose of this study was to clarify the superiority of robotic-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement in terms of screw insertion time, fluoroscopy time, and operation time. Methods The subjects were 46 patients who underwent a posterior lumbar interbody fusion with an open procedure for lumbar degenerative disease from April 2021 to February 2022. The robot group contained 29 cases of screw insertion using a spine robotic system (Mazor X Stealth Edition, Medtronic Inc., Dublin, Ireland). The freehand group contained 17 cases of screw insertion with the freehand technique utilizing the conventional C-arm image guidance. The screw insertion time, fluoroscopy time, and operation time were compared between the robot and the freehand group. Results The screw insertion time did not differ significantly between the two groups (robot group: 179.0 ± 65.2 sec; freehand group: 164.2 ± 83.4 sec; p = 0.507). The fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the robot group (robot group: 28.3 ± 25.8 sec; freehand group: 67.5 ± 72.8 sec; p = 0.011). The fluoroscopy time per segment was also significantly shorter in the robot group (robot group: 17.8 ± 23.0 sec; freehand group: 60.2 ± 74.8 sec; p = 0.007). The operation time was significantly longer in the robot group (robot group: 249.6 ± 72.5 min; freehand group: 195.8 ± 60.1 sec; p = 0.013), but the operation time per segment did not differ significantly between the two groups (robot group: 144.1 ± 39.0 min; freehand group: 159.7 ± 34.4 min; p = 0.477). Conclusions The screw insertion time and operation time per segment were similar when employing the spine robotic system compared to the freehand technique; however, the fluoroscopy time was shorter. The fluoroscopy time per segment in the robot group was 29.6% of the time of the freehand group using the C-arm. The surgeon's radiation exposure is thought to be decreased since the spine robotic system shortens the fluoroscopy time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9199567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91995672022-06-16 Screw Insertion Time, Fluoroscopy Time, and Operation Time for Robotic-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Compared With Freehand Technique Torii, Yoshiaki Ueno, Jun Umehara, Tasuku Iinuma, Masahiro Yoshida, Atsuhiro Tomochika, Ken Niki, Hisateru Akazawa, Tsutomu Cureus Orthopedics Introduction The purpose of this study was to clarify the superiority of robotic-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement in terms of screw insertion time, fluoroscopy time, and operation time. Methods The subjects were 46 patients who underwent a posterior lumbar interbody fusion with an open procedure for lumbar degenerative disease from April 2021 to February 2022. The robot group contained 29 cases of screw insertion using a spine robotic system (Mazor X Stealth Edition, Medtronic Inc., Dublin, Ireland). The freehand group contained 17 cases of screw insertion with the freehand technique utilizing the conventional C-arm image guidance. The screw insertion time, fluoroscopy time, and operation time were compared between the robot and the freehand group. Results The screw insertion time did not differ significantly between the two groups (robot group: 179.0 ± 65.2 sec; freehand group: 164.2 ± 83.4 sec; p = 0.507). The fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the robot group (robot group: 28.3 ± 25.8 sec; freehand group: 67.5 ± 72.8 sec; p = 0.011). The fluoroscopy time per segment was also significantly shorter in the robot group (robot group: 17.8 ± 23.0 sec; freehand group: 60.2 ± 74.8 sec; p = 0.007). The operation time was significantly longer in the robot group (robot group: 249.6 ± 72.5 min; freehand group: 195.8 ± 60.1 sec; p = 0.013), but the operation time per segment did not differ significantly between the two groups (robot group: 144.1 ± 39.0 min; freehand group: 159.7 ± 34.4 min; p = 0.477). Conclusions The screw insertion time and operation time per segment were similar when employing the spine robotic system compared to the freehand technique; however, the fluoroscopy time was shorter. The fluoroscopy time per segment in the robot group was 29.6% of the time of the freehand group using the C-arm. The surgeon's radiation exposure is thought to be decreased since the spine robotic system shortens the fluoroscopy time. Cureus 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9199567/ /pubmed/35719818 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25039 Text en Copyright © 2022, Torii et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Torii, Yoshiaki
Ueno, Jun
Umehara, Tasuku
Iinuma, Masahiro
Yoshida, Atsuhiro
Tomochika, Ken
Niki, Hisateru
Akazawa, Tsutomu
Screw Insertion Time, Fluoroscopy Time, and Operation Time for Robotic-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Compared With Freehand Technique
title Screw Insertion Time, Fluoroscopy Time, and Operation Time for Robotic-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Compared With Freehand Technique
title_full Screw Insertion Time, Fluoroscopy Time, and Operation Time for Robotic-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Compared With Freehand Technique
title_fullStr Screw Insertion Time, Fluoroscopy Time, and Operation Time for Robotic-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Compared With Freehand Technique
title_full_unstemmed Screw Insertion Time, Fluoroscopy Time, and Operation Time for Robotic-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Compared With Freehand Technique
title_short Screw Insertion Time, Fluoroscopy Time, and Operation Time for Robotic-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Compared With Freehand Technique
title_sort screw insertion time, fluoroscopy time, and operation time for robotic-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement compared with freehand technique
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719818
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25039
work_keys_str_mv AT toriiyoshiaki screwinsertiontimefluoroscopytimeandoperationtimeforroboticassistedlumbarpediclescrewplacementcomparedwithfreehandtechnique
AT uenojun screwinsertiontimefluoroscopytimeandoperationtimeforroboticassistedlumbarpediclescrewplacementcomparedwithfreehandtechnique
AT umeharatasuku screwinsertiontimefluoroscopytimeandoperationtimeforroboticassistedlumbarpediclescrewplacementcomparedwithfreehandtechnique
AT iinumamasahiro screwinsertiontimefluoroscopytimeandoperationtimeforroboticassistedlumbarpediclescrewplacementcomparedwithfreehandtechnique
AT yoshidaatsuhiro screwinsertiontimefluoroscopytimeandoperationtimeforroboticassistedlumbarpediclescrewplacementcomparedwithfreehandtechnique
AT tomochikaken screwinsertiontimefluoroscopytimeandoperationtimeforroboticassistedlumbarpediclescrewplacementcomparedwithfreehandtechnique
AT nikihisateru screwinsertiontimefluoroscopytimeandoperationtimeforroboticassistedlumbarpediclescrewplacementcomparedwithfreehandtechnique
AT akazawatsutomu screwinsertiontimefluoroscopytimeandoperationtimeforroboticassistedlumbarpediclescrewplacementcomparedwithfreehandtechnique