Cargando…

Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia

The idea of faculty engaging in meaningful dialogue with different publics instead of simply communicating their research to interested audiences has gradually morphed from a novel concept to a mainstay within most parts of the academy. Given the wide variety of public engagement modalities, it may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calice, Mikhaila N., Beets, Becca, Bao, Luye, Scheufele, Dietram A., Freiling, Isabelle, Brossard, Dominique, Feinstein, Noah Weeth, Heisler, Laura, Tangen, Travis, Handelsman, Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35704652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269949
_version_ 1784728044890488832
author Calice, Mikhaila N.
Beets, Becca
Bao, Luye
Scheufele, Dietram A.
Freiling, Isabelle
Brossard, Dominique
Feinstein, Noah Weeth
Heisler, Laura
Tangen, Travis
Handelsman, Jo
author_facet Calice, Mikhaila N.
Beets, Becca
Bao, Luye
Scheufele, Dietram A.
Freiling, Isabelle
Brossard, Dominique
Feinstein, Noah Weeth
Heisler, Laura
Tangen, Travis
Handelsman, Jo
author_sort Calice, Mikhaila N.
collection PubMed
description The idea of faculty engaging in meaningful dialogue with different publics instead of simply communicating their research to interested audiences has gradually morphed from a novel concept to a mainstay within most parts of the academy. Given the wide variety of public engagement modalities, it may be unsurprising that we still lack a comprehensive and granular understanding of factors that influence faculty willingness to engage with public audiences. Those nuances are not always captured by quantitative surveys that rely on pre-determined categories to assess scholars’ willingness to engage. While closed-ended categories are useful to examine which factors influence the willingness to engage more than others, it is unlikely that pre-determined categories comprehensively represent the range of factors that undermine or encourage engagement, including perceptual influences, institutional barriers, and scholars’ lived experiences. To gain insight into these individual perspectives and lived experiences, we conducted focus group discussions with faculty members at a large midwestern land-grant university in the United States. Our findings provide context to previous studies of public engagement and suggest four themes for future research. These themes affirm the persistence of institutional barriers to engaging with the public, particularly the expectations in the promotion process for tenure-track faculty. However, we also find a perception that junior faculty and graduate students are challenging the status quo by introducing a new wave of attention to public engagement. This finding suggests a “trickle-up” effect through junior faculty and graduate students expecting institutional support for public engagement. Our findings highlight the need to consider how both top-down factors such as institutional expectations and bottom-up factors such as graduate student interest shape faculty members’ decisions to participate in public engagement activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9200360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92003602022-06-16 Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia Calice, Mikhaila N. Beets, Becca Bao, Luye Scheufele, Dietram A. Freiling, Isabelle Brossard, Dominique Feinstein, Noah Weeth Heisler, Laura Tangen, Travis Handelsman, Jo PLoS One Research Article The idea of faculty engaging in meaningful dialogue with different publics instead of simply communicating their research to interested audiences has gradually morphed from a novel concept to a mainstay within most parts of the academy. Given the wide variety of public engagement modalities, it may be unsurprising that we still lack a comprehensive and granular understanding of factors that influence faculty willingness to engage with public audiences. Those nuances are not always captured by quantitative surveys that rely on pre-determined categories to assess scholars’ willingness to engage. While closed-ended categories are useful to examine which factors influence the willingness to engage more than others, it is unlikely that pre-determined categories comprehensively represent the range of factors that undermine or encourage engagement, including perceptual influences, institutional barriers, and scholars’ lived experiences. To gain insight into these individual perspectives and lived experiences, we conducted focus group discussions with faculty members at a large midwestern land-grant university in the United States. Our findings provide context to previous studies of public engagement and suggest four themes for future research. These themes affirm the persistence of institutional barriers to engaging with the public, particularly the expectations in the promotion process for tenure-track faculty. However, we also find a perception that junior faculty and graduate students are challenging the status quo by introducing a new wave of attention to public engagement. This finding suggests a “trickle-up” effect through junior faculty and graduate students expecting institutional support for public engagement. Our findings highlight the need to consider how both top-down factors such as institutional expectations and bottom-up factors such as graduate student interest shape faculty members’ decisions to participate in public engagement activities. Public Library of Science 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9200360/ /pubmed/35704652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269949 Text en © 2022 Calice et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Calice, Mikhaila N.
Beets, Becca
Bao, Luye
Scheufele, Dietram A.
Freiling, Isabelle
Brossard, Dominique
Feinstein, Noah Weeth
Heisler, Laura
Tangen, Travis
Handelsman, Jo
Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia
title Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia
title_full Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia
title_fullStr Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia
title_full_unstemmed Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia
title_short Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia
title_sort public engagement: faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35704652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269949
work_keys_str_mv AT calicemikhailan publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia
AT beetsbecca publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia
AT baoluye publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia
AT scheufeledietrama publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia
AT freilingisabelle publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia
AT brossarddominique publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia
AT feinsteinnoahweeth publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia
AT heislerlaura publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia
AT tangentravis publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia
AT handelsmanjo publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia