Cargando…
Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia
The idea of faculty engaging in meaningful dialogue with different publics instead of simply communicating their research to interested audiences has gradually morphed from a novel concept to a mainstay within most parts of the academy. Given the wide variety of public engagement modalities, it may...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35704652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269949 |
_version_ | 1784728044890488832 |
---|---|
author | Calice, Mikhaila N. Beets, Becca Bao, Luye Scheufele, Dietram A. Freiling, Isabelle Brossard, Dominique Feinstein, Noah Weeth Heisler, Laura Tangen, Travis Handelsman, Jo |
author_facet | Calice, Mikhaila N. Beets, Becca Bao, Luye Scheufele, Dietram A. Freiling, Isabelle Brossard, Dominique Feinstein, Noah Weeth Heisler, Laura Tangen, Travis Handelsman, Jo |
author_sort | Calice, Mikhaila N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The idea of faculty engaging in meaningful dialogue with different publics instead of simply communicating their research to interested audiences has gradually morphed from a novel concept to a mainstay within most parts of the academy. Given the wide variety of public engagement modalities, it may be unsurprising that we still lack a comprehensive and granular understanding of factors that influence faculty willingness to engage with public audiences. Those nuances are not always captured by quantitative surveys that rely on pre-determined categories to assess scholars’ willingness to engage. While closed-ended categories are useful to examine which factors influence the willingness to engage more than others, it is unlikely that pre-determined categories comprehensively represent the range of factors that undermine or encourage engagement, including perceptual influences, institutional barriers, and scholars’ lived experiences. To gain insight into these individual perspectives and lived experiences, we conducted focus group discussions with faculty members at a large midwestern land-grant university in the United States. Our findings provide context to previous studies of public engagement and suggest four themes for future research. These themes affirm the persistence of institutional barriers to engaging with the public, particularly the expectations in the promotion process for tenure-track faculty. However, we also find a perception that junior faculty and graduate students are challenging the status quo by introducing a new wave of attention to public engagement. This finding suggests a “trickle-up” effect through junior faculty and graduate students expecting institutional support for public engagement. Our findings highlight the need to consider how both top-down factors such as institutional expectations and bottom-up factors such as graduate student interest shape faculty members’ decisions to participate in public engagement activities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9200360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92003602022-06-16 Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia Calice, Mikhaila N. Beets, Becca Bao, Luye Scheufele, Dietram A. Freiling, Isabelle Brossard, Dominique Feinstein, Noah Weeth Heisler, Laura Tangen, Travis Handelsman, Jo PLoS One Research Article The idea of faculty engaging in meaningful dialogue with different publics instead of simply communicating their research to interested audiences has gradually morphed from a novel concept to a mainstay within most parts of the academy. Given the wide variety of public engagement modalities, it may be unsurprising that we still lack a comprehensive and granular understanding of factors that influence faculty willingness to engage with public audiences. Those nuances are not always captured by quantitative surveys that rely on pre-determined categories to assess scholars’ willingness to engage. While closed-ended categories are useful to examine which factors influence the willingness to engage more than others, it is unlikely that pre-determined categories comprehensively represent the range of factors that undermine or encourage engagement, including perceptual influences, institutional barriers, and scholars’ lived experiences. To gain insight into these individual perspectives and lived experiences, we conducted focus group discussions with faculty members at a large midwestern land-grant university in the United States. Our findings provide context to previous studies of public engagement and suggest four themes for future research. These themes affirm the persistence of institutional barriers to engaging with the public, particularly the expectations in the promotion process for tenure-track faculty. However, we also find a perception that junior faculty and graduate students are challenging the status quo by introducing a new wave of attention to public engagement. This finding suggests a “trickle-up” effect through junior faculty and graduate students expecting institutional support for public engagement. Our findings highlight the need to consider how both top-down factors such as institutional expectations and bottom-up factors such as graduate student interest shape faculty members’ decisions to participate in public engagement activities. Public Library of Science 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9200360/ /pubmed/35704652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269949 Text en © 2022 Calice et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Calice, Mikhaila N. Beets, Becca Bao, Luye Scheufele, Dietram A. Freiling, Isabelle Brossard, Dominique Feinstein, Noah Weeth Heisler, Laura Tangen, Travis Handelsman, Jo Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia |
title | Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia |
title_full | Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia |
title_fullStr | Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia |
title_full_unstemmed | Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia |
title_short | Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia |
title_sort | public engagement: faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35704652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269949 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calicemikhailan publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia AT beetsbecca publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia AT baoluye publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia AT scheufeledietrama publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia AT freilingisabelle publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia AT brossarddominique publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia AT feinsteinnoahweeth publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia AT heislerlaura publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia AT tangentravis publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia AT handelsmanjo publicengagementfacultylivedexperiencesandperspectivesunderscorebarriersandachangingcultureinacademia |