Cargando…
Augmented Reality Device for Preoperative Marking of Spine Surgery Can Improve the Accuracy of Level Identification
INTRODUCTION: Wrong-site spine surgery is an incident that could result in possible severe complications. In this present spinal surgery, the accurate spinal level is confirmed via preoperative or intraoperative radiographic marking. However, the location of radiographic marking has been determined...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35800633 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2021-0168 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Wrong-site spine surgery is an incident that could result in possible severe complications. In this present spinal surgery, the accurate spinal level is confirmed via preoperative or intraoperative radiographic marking. However, the location of radiographic marking has been determined from the manual palpation on the landmarks of the body surface. As a result, severe spine deformity can make it hard to identify the spinal level by manual palpation, thus leading to misidentification of the spinal level. Recently, the use of mixed reality in spine surgery is gradually increasing. In this study, we will demonstrate a head-mounted display (HMD) device that can project a hologram (3D image) of the patient's bone onto the actual patient's body to improve the accuracy of level identification for spine surgery. TECHNICAL NOTE: 3D CT images are created preoperatively, and the bone's STL data (3D data) are generated with the workstation. The created STL data are downloaded to the augmented reality software Holoeyes, installed on the HMD. Through this device, surgeons can view the hologram (3D image) of a patient's bone overlaying on an actual patient's body. We temporally estimated the spinous process level only by manual palpation without an HMD. Then, we estimated the spinous process level again after matching this hologram to a real bone with an HMD. The accuracy of the level identification with an HMD and without an HMD was examined by radiographic marking in order to evaluate the misidentification rate of the level. Without an HMD, the misidentification rate of the level was at 26.5%, while with it, the rate was reduced to 14.3%. CONCLUSIONS: On preoperative marking, an HMD-projecting bone image onto a patient's body could allow us to estimate the spinal level more accurately. Identification of the spinal level using mixed reality is effective in preventing wrong-site spine surgery. |
---|