Cargando…

Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study

PURPOSE: Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome following surgery. The Carolinas Comfort scale (CCS) is a specific questionnaire used to evaluate QoL in patients who underwent abdominal hernia repair with mesh. The aim of this study was to create a Lithuanian version of the CCS. METHODS: A qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parseliunas, A., Paskauskas, S., Simatoniene, V., Vaitekunas, J., Venskutonis, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02399-4
_version_ 1784728114744524800
author Parseliunas, A.
Paskauskas, S.
Simatoniene, V.
Vaitekunas, J.
Venskutonis, D.
author_facet Parseliunas, A.
Paskauskas, S.
Simatoniene, V.
Vaitekunas, J.
Venskutonis, D.
author_sort Parseliunas, A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome following surgery. The Carolinas Comfort scale (CCS) is a specific questionnaire used to evaluate QoL in patients who underwent abdominal hernia repair with mesh. The aim of this study was to create a Lithuanian version of the CCS. METHODS: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A Lithuanian version of the CCS was created by translating the original questionnaire in accordance with the guidelines. The Lithuanian questionnaire was provided to hernia patients at 1 week and at 1 month postoperatively. The main validation characteristics of the Lithuanian CCS were assessed and compared to the original version. RESULTS: The complete response rate of patients was close to 90%. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.953. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.361 to 0.703 in the test–retest analysis. In the construct validity analysis, the strongest correlations were observed in the domains of physical functioning and bodily pain (− 0.655 and − 0.584, respectively) and the weakest correlations in role-emotional and mental health (− 0.268 and − 0.230, respectively). The mean scores of all CCS domains and the total score for satisfied patients were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than those of dissatisfied patients. The principal component analysis identified 3 components, with the first accounting for 56% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: The Lithuanian version of CCS maintains the original validity and is a reliable and valid tool for assessing specific QoL factors after the repair of inguinal hernia with mesh. We recommend using this CCS version in personal, local, and international contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-021-02399-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9200669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92006692022-06-17 Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study Parseliunas, A. Paskauskas, S. Simatoniene, V. Vaitekunas, J. Venskutonis, D. Hernia Original Article PURPOSE: Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome following surgery. The Carolinas Comfort scale (CCS) is a specific questionnaire used to evaluate QoL in patients who underwent abdominal hernia repair with mesh. The aim of this study was to create a Lithuanian version of the CCS. METHODS: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A Lithuanian version of the CCS was created by translating the original questionnaire in accordance with the guidelines. The Lithuanian questionnaire was provided to hernia patients at 1 week and at 1 month postoperatively. The main validation characteristics of the Lithuanian CCS were assessed and compared to the original version. RESULTS: The complete response rate of patients was close to 90%. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.953. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.361 to 0.703 in the test–retest analysis. In the construct validity analysis, the strongest correlations were observed in the domains of physical functioning and bodily pain (− 0.655 and − 0.584, respectively) and the weakest correlations in role-emotional and mental health (− 0.268 and − 0.230, respectively). The mean scores of all CCS domains and the total score for satisfied patients were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than those of dissatisfied patients. The principal component analysis identified 3 components, with the first accounting for 56% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: The Lithuanian version of CCS maintains the original validity and is a reliable and valid tool for assessing specific QoL factors after the repair of inguinal hernia with mesh. We recommend using this CCS version in personal, local, and international contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-021-02399-4. Springer Paris 2021-03-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9200669/ /pubmed/33782789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02399-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Parseliunas, A.
Paskauskas, S.
Simatoniene, V.
Vaitekunas, J.
Venskutonis, D.
Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
title Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
title_full Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
title_short Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
title_sort adaptation and validation of the carolinas comfort scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02399-4
work_keys_str_mv AT parseliunasa adaptationandvalidationofthecarolinascomfortscaleaquestionnairebasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT paskauskass adaptationandvalidationofthecarolinascomfortscaleaquestionnairebasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT simatonienev adaptationandvalidationofthecarolinascomfortscaleaquestionnairebasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT vaitekunasj adaptationandvalidationofthecarolinascomfortscaleaquestionnairebasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT venskutonisd adaptationandvalidationofthecarolinascomfortscaleaquestionnairebasedcrosssectionalstudy