Cargando…

Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to probe inhibitory intracortical neurotransmission and has been used to infer the neurobiological dysfunction that may underly several neurological disorders. One technique, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), indexes gamma-aminobutyric ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cerins, Andris, Corp, Daniel, Opie, George, Do, Michael, Speranza, Bridgette, He, Jason, Barhoun, Pamela, Fuelscher, Ian, Enticott, Peter, Hyde, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14271-1
_version_ 1784728154901839872
author Cerins, Andris
Corp, Daniel
Opie, George
Do, Michael
Speranza, Bridgette
He, Jason
Barhoun, Pamela
Fuelscher, Ian
Enticott, Peter
Hyde, Christian
author_facet Cerins, Andris
Corp, Daniel
Opie, George
Do, Michael
Speranza, Bridgette
He, Jason
Barhoun, Pamela
Fuelscher, Ian
Enticott, Peter
Hyde, Christian
author_sort Cerins, Andris
collection PubMed
description Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to probe inhibitory intracortical neurotransmission and has been used to infer the neurobiological dysfunction that may underly several neurological disorders. One technique, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), indexes gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) mediated inhibitory activity and is a promising biomarker. However emerging evidence suggests SICI does not exclusively represent GABAergic activity because it may be influenced by inter-individual differences in the specific excitatory neural populations activated by TMS. Here we used the latency of TMS motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to index these inter-individual differences, and found that a significant proportion of the observed variability in SICI magnitude was accounted for by MEP latency, r = − 0.57, r(2) = 0.33, p = .014. We conclude that SICI is influenced by inter-individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by TMS, reducing the precision of this GABAergic probe. Interpreting SICI measures in the context of MEP latency may facilitate a more precise assessment of GABAergic intracortical inhibition. The reduced cortical inhibition observed in some neuropathologies could be influenced by reduced activity in specific excitatory neural populations. Including MEP latency assessment in research investigating SICI in clinical groups could assist in differentiating the cortical circuits impacted by neurological disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9200840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92008402022-06-17 Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation Cerins, Andris Corp, Daniel Opie, George Do, Michael Speranza, Bridgette He, Jason Barhoun, Pamela Fuelscher, Ian Enticott, Peter Hyde, Christian Sci Rep Article Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to probe inhibitory intracortical neurotransmission and has been used to infer the neurobiological dysfunction that may underly several neurological disorders. One technique, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), indexes gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) mediated inhibitory activity and is a promising biomarker. However emerging evidence suggests SICI does not exclusively represent GABAergic activity because it may be influenced by inter-individual differences in the specific excitatory neural populations activated by TMS. Here we used the latency of TMS motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to index these inter-individual differences, and found that a significant proportion of the observed variability in SICI magnitude was accounted for by MEP latency, r = − 0.57, r(2) = 0.33, p = .014. We conclude that SICI is influenced by inter-individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by TMS, reducing the precision of this GABAergic probe. Interpreting SICI measures in the context of MEP latency may facilitate a more precise assessment of GABAergic intracortical inhibition. The reduced cortical inhibition observed in some neuropathologies could be influenced by reduced activity in specific excitatory neural populations. Including MEP latency assessment in research investigating SICI in clinical groups could assist in differentiating the cortical circuits impacted by neurological disorders. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9200840/ /pubmed/35705672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14271-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Cerins, Andris
Corp, Daniel
Opie, George
Do, Michael
Speranza, Bridgette
He, Jason
Barhoun, Pamela
Fuelscher, Ian
Enticott, Peter
Hyde, Christian
Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation
title Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_full Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_fullStr Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_short Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_sort assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14271-1
work_keys_str_mv AT cerinsandris assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT corpdaniel assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT opiegeorge assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT domichael assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT speranzabridgette assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT hejason assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT barhounpamela assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT fuelscherian assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT enticottpeter assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT hydechristian assessmentofcorticalinhibitiondependsoninterindividualdifferencesintheexcitatoryneuralpopulationsactivatedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation