Cargando…
Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics
Accumulating evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supports 7 days treatment for uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteraemia. However, some patient populations were not well represented in these RCTs, including critically ill patients, immunocompromised patients and those with MDR bacteria....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlac058 |
_version_ | 1784728263702085632 |
---|---|
author | Yahav, Dafna Paul, Mical Van Nieuwkoop, Cees Huttner, Angela |
author_facet | Yahav, Dafna Paul, Mical Van Nieuwkoop, Cees Huttner, Angela |
author_sort | Yahav, Dafna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accumulating evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supports 7 days treatment for uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteraemia. However, some patient populations were not well represented in these RCTs, including critically ill patients, immunocompromised patients and those with MDR bacteria. In this debate document, we discuss the pros and cons for treating patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia with a 7 day antibiotic course. We surmise that the patients who were not well represented in the RCTs are probably those who have most to lose from the drawbacks of prolonged antibiotic courses, including adverse events, superinfections and resistance development. Treatment durations among these patients can be managed individually, with C-reactive protein or procalcitonin guidance or by clinical measures, and with care to discontinue antibiotics as soon as the patient recovers clinically from the infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9201237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92012372022-06-16 Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics Yahav, Dafna Paul, Mical Van Nieuwkoop, Cees Huttner, Angela JAC Antimicrob Resist For Debate Accumulating evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supports 7 days treatment for uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteraemia. However, some patient populations were not well represented in these RCTs, including critically ill patients, immunocompromised patients and those with MDR bacteria. In this debate document, we discuss the pros and cons for treating patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia with a 7 day antibiotic course. We surmise that the patients who were not well represented in the RCTs are probably those who have most to lose from the drawbacks of prolonged antibiotic courses, including adverse events, superinfections and resistance development. Treatment durations among these patients can be managed individually, with C-reactive protein or procalcitonin guidance or by clinical measures, and with care to discontinue antibiotics as soon as the patient recovers clinically from the infection. Oxford University Press 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9201237/ /pubmed/35719202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlac058 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | For Debate Yahav, Dafna Paul, Mical Van Nieuwkoop, Cees Huttner, Angela Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics |
title | Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics |
title_full | Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics |
title_fullStr | Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics |
title_full_unstemmed | Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics |
title_short | Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics |
title_sort | is shorter always better? the pros and cons of treating gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics |
topic | For Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlac058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yahavdafna isshorteralwaysbettertheprosandconsoftreatinggramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswith7daysofantibiotics AT paulmical isshorteralwaysbettertheprosandconsoftreatinggramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswith7daysofantibiotics AT vannieuwkoopcees isshorteralwaysbettertheprosandconsoftreatinggramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswith7daysofantibiotics AT huttnerangela isshorteralwaysbettertheprosandconsoftreatinggramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswith7daysofantibiotics |