Cargando…

Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation in neonates is challenging and requires a high level of precision, due to narrow and short airways, especially in preterm newborns. The current gold standard for endotracheal tube (ETT) verification is chest X-ray (CXR); however, this method presents some limitati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Congedi, Sabrina, Savio, Federica, Auciello, Maria, Salvadori, Sabrina, Nardo, Daniel, Bonadies, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722478
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.886450
_version_ 1784728273847058432
author Congedi, Sabrina
Savio, Federica
Auciello, Maria
Salvadori, Sabrina
Nardo, Daniel
Bonadies, Luca
author_facet Congedi, Sabrina
Savio, Federica
Auciello, Maria
Salvadori, Sabrina
Nardo, Daniel
Bonadies, Luca
author_sort Congedi, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation in neonates is challenging and requires a high level of precision, due to narrow and short airways, especially in preterm newborns. The current gold standard for endotracheal tube (ETT) verification is chest X-ray (CXR); however, this method presents some limitations, such as ionizing radiation exposure and delayed in obtaining the radiographic images, that point of care ultrasound (POCUS) could overcome. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ultrasound efficacy in determining ETT placement adequacy in preterm and term newborns. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the time required for ultrasound confirmation vs. time needed for other standard of care methods. SEARCH METHODS: A search in Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed. Our most recent search was conducted in September 2021 including the following keywords: “newborn”, “infant”, “neonate”, “endotracheal intubation”, “endotracheal tube”, “ultrasonography”, “ultrasound”. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, prospective, retrospective and cross-sectional studies published after 2012, involving neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients needing intubation/intubated infants and evaluating POCUS efficacy and/or accuracy in detecting ETT position vs. a defined gold-standard method. Three review authors independently assessed the studies' quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 14 eligible studies including a total of 602 ETT evaluations in NICU or in the delivery room. In about 80% of cases the gold standard for ETT position verification was CXR. Ultrasound was able to identify the presence of ETT in 96.8% of the evaluations, with a pooled POCUS sensitivity of 93.44% (95% CI: 90.4–95.75%) in detecting an appropriately positioned ETT as assessed by CXR. Bedside ultrasound confirmation was also found to be significantly faster compared to obtaining a CXR. CONCLUSION: POCUS appears to be a fast and effective technique to identify correct endotracheal intubation in newborns. This review could add value and importance to the use of this promising technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9201277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92012772022-06-17 Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis Congedi, Sabrina Savio, Federica Auciello, Maria Salvadori, Sabrina Nardo, Daniel Bonadies, Luca Front Pediatr Pediatrics BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation in neonates is challenging and requires a high level of precision, due to narrow and short airways, especially in preterm newborns. The current gold standard for endotracheal tube (ETT) verification is chest X-ray (CXR); however, this method presents some limitations, such as ionizing radiation exposure and delayed in obtaining the radiographic images, that point of care ultrasound (POCUS) could overcome. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ultrasound efficacy in determining ETT placement adequacy in preterm and term newborns. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the time required for ultrasound confirmation vs. time needed for other standard of care methods. SEARCH METHODS: A search in Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed. Our most recent search was conducted in September 2021 including the following keywords: “newborn”, “infant”, “neonate”, “endotracheal intubation”, “endotracheal tube”, “ultrasonography”, “ultrasound”. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, prospective, retrospective and cross-sectional studies published after 2012, involving neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients needing intubation/intubated infants and evaluating POCUS efficacy and/or accuracy in detecting ETT position vs. a defined gold-standard method. Three review authors independently assessed the studies' quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 14 eligible studies including a total of 602 ETT evaluations in NICU or in the delivery room. In about 80% of cases the gold standard for ETT position verification was CXR. Ultrasound was able to identify the presence of ETT in 96.8% of the evaluations, with a pooled POCUS sensitivity of 93.44% (95% CI: 90.4–95.75%) in detecting an appropriately positioned ETT as assessed by CXR. Bedside ultrasound confirmation was also found to be significantly faster compared to obtaining a CXR. CONCLUSION: POCUS appears to be a fast and effective technique to identify correct endotracheal intubation in newborns. This review could add value and importance to the use of this promising technique. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9201277/ /pubmed/35722478 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.886450 Text en Copyright © 2022 Congedi, Savio, Auciello, Salvadori, Nardo and Bonadies. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Congedi, Sabrina
Savio, Federica
Auciello, Maria
Salvadori, Sabrina
Nardo, Daniel
Bonadies, Luca
Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis
title Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort sonographic evaluation of the endotracheal tube position in the neonatal population: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722478
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.886450
work_keys_str_mv AT congedisabrina sonographicevaluationoftheendotrachealtubepositionintheneonatalpopulationacomprehensivereviewandmetaanalysis
AT saviofederica sonographicevaluationoftheendotrachealtubepositionintheneonatalpopulationacomprehensivereviewandmetaanalysis
AT auciellomaria sonographicevaluationoftheendotrachealtubepositionintheneonatalpopulationacomprehensivereviewandmetaanalysis
AT salvadorisabrina sonographicevaluationoftheendotrachealtubepositionintheneonatalpopulationacomprehensivereviewandmetaanalysis
AT nardodaniel sonographicevaluationoftheendotrachealtubepositionintheneonatalpopulationacomprehensivereviewandmetaanalysis
AT bonadiesluca sonographicevaluationoftheendotrachealtubepositionintheneonatalpopulationacomprehensivereviewandmetaanalysis