Cargando…

Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Determinant Factors among General Public in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are an effective and ideal solution that can reduce the burden of disease worldwide. Although vaccines are the most effective way to prevent infectious diseases. Anti-vaccine conspiracy theories impair vaccination acceptance intentions. Several studies were conducted in East Afr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alemayehu, Astawus, Demissie, Abebaw, Yusuf, Mohammed, Gemechu Lencha, Abebe, Oljira, Lemessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928221106269
_version_ 1784728298139418624
author Alemayehu, Astawus
Demissie, Abebaw
Yusuf, Mohammed
Gemechu Lencha, Abebe
Oljira, Lemessa
author_facet Alemayehu, Astawus
Demissie, Abebaw
Yusuf, Mohammed
Gemechu Lencha, Abebe
Oljira, Lemessa
author_sort Alemayehu, Astawus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccines are an effective and ideal solution that can reduce the burden of disease worldwide. Although vaccines are the most effective way to prevent infectious diseases. Anti-vaccine conspiracy theories impair vaccination acceptance intentions. Several studies were conducted in East Africa. However, these studies had reported inconsistent findings. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to pool the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and identify its determinants. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, and GLOBAL HEALTH databases were used to retrieve previously published studies. All papers published in the English language up to February 28, 2022 were included. The result was written and reported according to the PRISMA updated guideline. A random-effect model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence and effect sizes. Heterogeneity was assessed using I(2) test statistics. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and egger’s test statistics. Statistical tests result at P-value<0.05 were declared as having significance. Result: A total of 25 Cross-sectional studies with a total sample size of 33,044 were included in this study. The pooled prevalence of Covid-19 vaccine acceptance was 60.2%, (95%CI: 52.8- 67.3). Egger’s test statistics (P = 0.003) showed there is a significant publication bias. Attending above secondary school (AOR: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.37, 2.96), having good knowledge about the vaccine (AOR: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.6, 2.8), having a positive attitude towards vaccine (AOR: 3.8, 95%CI: 2.3, 6.2), history of COVID-19 infection (AOR: 2.7, 95%CI: 1.6, 4.7) and being male (AOR: 1.8, 95%CI: 1.2, 2.7) were found to have a significant association with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 vaccination acceptance rate was good, but it could be improved. The findings could help governments to figure out the best way to carry out COVID-19 mass vaccination campaigns. There is a lack of data in most countries. Therefore, we suggest more studies be conducted in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9201368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92013682022-06-17 Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Determinant Factors among General Public in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Alemayehu, Astawus Demissie, Abebaw Yusuf, Mohammed Gemechu Lencha, Abebe Oljira, Lemessa Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Vaccines are an effective and ideal solution that can reduce the burden of disease worldwide. Although vaccines are the most effective way to prevent infectious diseases. Anti-vaccine conspiracy theories impair vaccination acceptance intentions. Several studies were conducted in East Africa. However, these studies had reported inconsistent findings. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to pool the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and identify its determinants. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, and GLOBAL HEALTH databases were used to retrieve previously published studies. All papers published in the English language up to February 28, 2022 were included. The result was written and reported according to the PRISMA updated guideline. A random-effect model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence and effect sizes. Heterogeneity was assessed using I(2) test statistics. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and egger’s test statistics. Statistical tests result at P-value<0.05 were declared as having significance. Result: A total of 25 Cross-sectional studies with a total sample size of 33,044 were included in this study. The pooled prevalence of Covid-19 vaccine acceptance was 60.2%, (95%CI: 52.8- 67.3). Egger’s test statistics (P = 0.003) showed there is a significant publication bias. Attending above secondary school (AOR: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.37, 2.96), having good knowledge about the vaccine (AOR: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.6, 2.8), having a positive attitude towards vaccine (AOR: 3.8, 95%CI: 2.3, 6.2), history of COVID-19 infection (AOR: 2.7, 95%CI: 1.6, 4.7) and being male (AOR: 1.8, 95%CI: 1.2, 2.7) were found to have a significant association with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 vaccination acceptance rate was good, but it could be improved. The findings could help governments to figure out the best way to carry out COVID-19 mass vaccination campaigns. There is a lack of data in most countries. Therefore, we suggest more studies be conducted in the future. SAGE Publications 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9201368/ /pubmed/35720257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928221106269 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Alemayehu, Astawus
Demissie, Abebaw
Yusuf, Mohammed
Gemechu Lencha, Abebe
Oljira, Lemessa
Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Determinant Factors among General Public in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Determinant Factors among General Public in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Determinant Factors among General Public in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Determinant Factors among General Public in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Determinant Factors among General Public in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Determinant Factors among General Public in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort covid-19 vaccine acceptance and determinant factors among general public in east africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928221106269
work_keys_str_mv AT alemayehuastawus covid19vaccineacceptanceanddeterminantfactorsamonggeneralpublicineastafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT demissieabebaw covid19vaccineacceptanceanddeterminantfactorsamonggeneralpublicineastafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yusufmohammed covid19vaccineacceptanceanddeterminantfactorsamonggeneralpublicineastafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gemechulenchaabebe covid19vaccineacceptanceanddeterminantfactorsamonggeneralpublicineastafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oljiralemessa covid19vaccineacceptanceanddeterminantfactorsamonggeneralpublicineastafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis