Cargando…

Closing the communication gap in neonatal inter-hospital transfer: a neonatal referral form for resource-limited settings - a modified e-Delphi-consensus study

Background: Standardised neonatal referral forms (NRFs) facilitate effective communication between healthcare providers and ensure continuity of care between facilities, which are essential for patient safety. We sought to determine the essential data items, or core clinical information (CCI), that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mwizerwa, Oscar, Umuhoza, Christian, Corden, Mark H., Lissauer, Tom, Cartledge, Peter Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814632
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50980.2
_version_ 1784728313194872832
author Mwizerwa, Oscar
Umuhoza, Christian
Corden, Mark H.
Lissauer, Tom
Cartledge, Peter Thomas
author_facet Mwizerwa, Oscar
Umuhoza, Christian
Corden, Mark H.
Lissauer, Tom
Cartledge, Peter Thomas
author_sort Mwizerwa, Oscar
collection PubMed
description Background: Standardised neonatal referral forms (NRFs) facilitate effective communication between healthcare providers and ensure continuity of care between facilities, which are essential for patient safety. We sought to determine the essential data items, or core clinical information (CCI), that should be conveyed for neonatal inter-hospital transfer in resource-limited settings (Rounds 1 to 3) and to create an NRF suitable for our setting (Round 4). Methods: We conducted an international, four-round, modified Delphi-consensus study. Round-1 was a literature and internet search to identify existing NRFs. In Round-2 and -3, participants were Rwandan clinicians and international paediatric healthcare practitioners who had worked in Rwanda in the five years before the study. These participants evaluated the draft items and proposed additional items to be included in an NRF. Round-4 focused on creating the NRF and used five focus groups of Rwandan general practitioners at district hospitals. Results: We identified 16 pre-existing NRFs containing 125 individual items. Of these, 91 items met the pre-defined consensus criteria for inclusion in Round-2. Only 33 items were present in more than 50% of the 16 NRFs, confirming the need for this consensus study. In Round-2, participants proposed 12 new items, six of which met the pre-defined consensus criteria. In Round-3, participants scored items for importance, and 57 items met the final consensus criteria. In Round-4, 29 general practitioners took part in five focus groups; a total of 16 modifications were utilised to finalise the NRF. Conclusions: We generated a novel, robust, NRF that may be readily employed in resource-limited settings to communicate the essential clinical information to accompany a neonate requiring inter-hospital transfer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9201411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92014112022-07-07 Closing the communication gap in neonatal inter-hospital transfer: a neonatal referral form for resource-limited settings - a modified e-Delphi-consensus study Mwizerwa, Oscar Umuhoza, Christian Corden, Mark H. Lissauer, Tom Cartledge, Peter Thomas F1000Res Research Article Background: Standardised neonatal referral forms (NRFs) facilitate effective communication between healthcare providers and ensure continuity of care between facilities, which are essential for patient safety. We sought to determine the essential data items, or core clinical information (CCI), that should be conveyed for neonatal inter-hospital transfer in resource-limited settings (Rounds 1 to 3) and to create an NRF suitable for our setting (Round 4). Methods: We conducted an international, four-round, modified Delphi-consensus study. Round-1 was a literature and internet search to identify existing NRFs. In Round-2 and -3, participants were Rwandan clinicians and international paediatric healthcare practitioners who had worked in Rwanda in the five years before the study. These participants evaluated the draft items and proposed additional items to be included in an NRF. Round-4 focused on creating the NRF and used five focus groups of Rwandan general practitioners at district hospitals. Results: We identified 16 pre-existing NRFs containing 125 individual items. Of these, 91 items met the pre-defined consensus criteria for inclusion in Round-2. Only 33 items were present in more than 50% of the 16 NRFs, confirming the need for this consensus study. In Round-2, participants proposed 12 new items, six of which met the pre-defined consensus criteria. In Round-3, participants scored items for importance, and 57 items met the final consensus criteria. In Round-4, 29 general practitioners took part in five focus groups; a total of 16 modifications were utilised to finalise the NRF. Conclusions: We generated a novel, robust, NRF that may be readily employed in resource-limited settings to communicate the essential clinical information to accompany a neonate requiring inter-hospital transfer. F1000 Research Limited 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9201411/ /pubmed/35814632 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50980.2 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Mwizerwa O et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mwizerwa, Oscar
Umuhoza, Christian
Corden, Mark H.
Lissauer, Tom
Cartledge, Peter Thomas
Closing the communication gap in neonatal inter-hospital transfer: a neonatal referral form for resource-limited settings - a modified e-Delphi-consensus study
title Closing the communication gap in neonatal inter-hospital transfer: a neonatal referral form for resource-limited settings - a modified e-Delphi-consensus study
title_full Closing the communication gap in neonatal inter-hospital transfer: a neonatal referral form for resource-limited settings - a modified e-Delphi-consensus study
title_fullStr Closing the communication gap in neonatal inter-hospital transfer: a neonatal referral form for resource-limited settings - a modified e-Delphi-consensus study
title_full_unstemmed Closing the communication gap in neonatal inter-hospital transfer: a neonatal referral form for resource-limited settings - a modified e-Delphi-consensus study
title_short Closing the communication gap in neonatal inter-hospital transfer: a neonatal referral form for resource-limited settings - a modified e-Delphi-consensus study
title_sort closing the communication gap in neonatal inter-hospital transfer: a neonatal referral form for resource-limited settings - a modified e-delphi-consensus study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814632
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50980.2
work_keys_str_mv AT mwizerwaoscar closingthecommunicationgapinneonatalinterhospitaltransferaneonatalreferralformforresourcelimitedsettingsamodifiededelphiconsensusstudy
AT umuhozachristian closingthecommunicationgapinneonatalinterhospitaltransferaneonatalreferralformforresourcelimitedsettingsamodifiededelphiconsensusstudy
AT cordenmarkh closingthecommunicationgapinneonatalinterhospitaltransferaneonatalreferralformforresourcelimitedsettingsamodifiededelphiconsensusstudy
AT lissauertom closingthecommunicationgapinneonatalinterhospitaltransferaneonatalreferralformforresourcelimitedsettingsamodifiededelphiconsensusstudy
AT cartledgepeterthomas closingthecommunicationgapinneonatalinterhospitaltransferaneonatalreferralformforresourcelimitedsettingsamodifiededelphiconsensusstudy