Cargando…

Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications

Orthopedic fractures have a significant impact on patients in the form of economic loss and functional impairment. Beyond the standard methods of reduction and fixation, one adjunct that has been explored since the late 1970s is electrical stimulation. Despite robust evidence for efficacy in the pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicksic, Peter J., Donnelly, D’Andrea T., Verma, Nishant, Setiz, Allison J., Shoffstall, Andrew J., Ludwig, Kip A., Dingle, Aaron M., Poore, Samuel O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35721861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.879187
_version_ 1784728329131130880
author Nicksic, Peter J.
Donnelly, D’Andrea T.
Verma, Nishant
Setiz, Allison J.
Shoffstall, Andrew J.
Ludwig, Kip A.
Dingle, Aaron M.
Poore, Samuel O.
author_facet Nicksic, Peter J.
Donnelly, D’Andrea T.
Verma, Nishant
Setiz, Allison J.
Shoffstall, Andrew J.
Ludwig, Kip A.
Dingle, Aaron M.
Poore, Samuel O.
author_sort Nicksic, Peter J.
collection PubMed
description Orthopedic fractures have a significant impact on patients in the form of economic loss and functional impairment. Beyond the standard methods of reduction and fixation, one adjunct that has been explored since the late 1970s is electrical stimulation. Despite robust evidence for efficacy in the preclinical arena, human trials have mixed results, and this technology is not widely accepted. The purpose of this review is to examine the body of literature supporting electrical stimulation for the purpose of fracture healing in humans with an emphasis on device specifications and stimulation protocols and delineate a minimum reporting checklist for future studies of this type. We have isolated 12 studies that pertain to the administration of electrical stimulation for the purpose of augmenting fracture healing in humans. Of these, one was a direct current electrical stimulation study. Six studies utilized pulsed electromagnetic field therapy and five used capacitive coupling. When examining these studies, the device specifications were heterogenous and often incomplete in what they reported, which rendered studies unrepeatable. The stimulation protocols also varied greatly study to study. To demonstrate efficacy of electrical stimulation for fractures, the authors recommend isolating a fracture type that is prone to nonunion to maximize the electrical stimulation effect, a homogenous study population so as to not dilute the effect of electrical stimulation, and increasing scientific rigor in the form of pre-registration, blinding, and sham controls. Finally, we introduce the critical components of minimum device specification reporting for repeatability of studies of this type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9201474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92014742022-06-17 Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications Nicksic, Peter J. Donnelly, D’Andrea T. Verma, Nishant Setiz, Allison J. Shoffstall, Andrew J. Ludwig, Kip A. Dingle, Aaron M. Poore, Samuel O. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Orthopedic fractures have a significant impact on patients in the form of economic loss and functional impairment. Beyond the standard methods of reduction and fixation, one adjunct that has been explored since the late 1970s is electrical stimulation. Despite robust evidence for efficacy in the preclinical arena, human trials have mixed results, and this technology is not widely accepted. The purpose of this review is to examine the body of literature supporting electrical stimulation for the purpose of fracture healing in humans with an emphasis on device specifications and stimulation protocols and delineate a minimum reporting checklist for future studies of this type. We have isolated 12 studies that pertain to the administration of electrical stimulation for the purpose of augmenting fracture healing in humans. Of these, one was a direct current electrical stimulation study. Six studies utilized pulsed electromagnetic field therapy and five used capacitive coupling. When examining these studies, the device specifications were heterogenous and often incomplete in what they reported, which rendered studies unrepeatable. The stimulation protocols also varied greatly study to study. To demonstrate efficacy of electrical stimulation for fractures, the authors recommend isolating a fracture type that is prone to nonunion to maximize the electrical stimulation effect, a homogenous study population so as to not dilute the effect of electrical stimulation, and increasing scientific rigor in the form of pre-registration, blinding, and sham controls. Finally, we introduce the critical components of minimum device specification reporting for repeatability of studies of this type. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9201474/ /pubmed/35721861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.879187 Text en Copyright © 2022 Nicksic, Donnelly, Verma, Setiz, Shoffstall, Ludwig, Dingle and Poore. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Nicksic, Peter J.
Donnelly, D’Andrea T.
Verma, Nishant
Setiz, Allison J.
Shoffstall, Andrew J.
Ludwig, Kip A.
Dingle, Aaron M.
Poore, Samuel O.
Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications
title Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications
title_full Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications
title_fullStr Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications
title_full_unstemmed Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications
title_short Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications
title_sort electrical stimulation of acute fractures: a narrative review of stimulation protocols and device specifications
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35721861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.879187
work_keys_str_mv AT nicksicpeterj electricalstimulationofacutefracturesanarrativereviewofstimulationprotocolsanddevicespecifications
AT donnellydandreat electricalstimulationofacutefracturesanarrativereviewofstimulationprotocolsanddevicespecifications
AT vermanishant electricalstimulationofacutefracturesanarrativereviewofstimulationprotocolsanddevicespecifications
AT setizallisonj electricalstimulationofacutefracturesanarrativereviewofstimulationprotocolsanddevicespecifications
AT shoffstallandrewj electricalstimulationofacutefracturesanarrativereviewofstimulationprotocolsanddevicespecifications
AT ludwigkipa electricalstimulationofacutefracturesanarrativereviewofstimulationprotocolsanddevicespecifications
AT dingleaaronm electricalstimulationofacutefracturesanarrativereviewofstimulationprotocolsanddevicespecifications
AT pooresamuelo electricalstimulationofacutefracturesanarrativereviewofstimulationprotocolsanddevicespecifications