Cargando…

Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services

Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are vital for supporting people with IDD to live well in their communities, but there are not set standards for monitoring quality outcomes related to HCBS. In this paper, we propose p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogenschutz, Matthew, Dinora, Parthenia, Lineberry, Sarah, Prohn, Seb, Broda, Michael, West, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35721804
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.871178
_version_ 1784728370979799040
author Bogenschutz, Matthew
Dinora, Parthenia
Lineberry, Sarah
Prohn, Seb
Broda, Michael
West, Angela
author_facet Bogenschutz, Matthew
Dinora, Parthenia
Lineberry, Sarah
Prohn, Seb
Broda, Michael
West, Angela
author_sort Bogenschutz, Matthew
collection PubMed
description Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are vital for supporting people with IDD to live well in their communities, but there are not set standards for monitoring quality outcomes related to HCBS. In this paper, we propose promising practices for improving the quality of HCBS outcome measurement, based both in the literature and our own experience conducting an extensive U.S. state-level study. Specifically, we discuss: (1) using merged administrative datasets, (2) developing high-quality psychometrics that attend to ecological issues in measurement, (3) using advanced statistical analyses, and (4) creating immersive, user-friendly translational dissemination products. We conclude by suggesting what we see as important new frontiers for researchers to consider in order to enhance the quality of HCBS outcome measurement for people with IDD in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9201696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92016962022-06-16 Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services Bogenschutz, Matthew Dinora, Parthenia Lineberry, Sarah Prohn, Seb Broda, Michael West, Angela Front Rehabil Sci Rehabilitation Sciences Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are vital for supporting people with IDD to live well in their communities, but there are not set standards for monitoring quality outcomes related to HCBS. In this paper, we propose promising practices for improving the quality of HCBS outcome measurement, based both in the literature and our own experience conducting an extensive U.S. state-level study. Specifically, we discuss: (1) using merged administrative datasets, (2) developing high-quality psychometrics that attend to ecological issues in measurement, (3) using advanced statistical analyses, and (4) creating immersive, user-friendly translational dissemination products. We conclude by suggesting what we see as important new frontiers for researchers to consider in order to enhance the quality of HCBS outcome measurement for people with IDD in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9201696/ /pubmed/35721804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.871178 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bogenschutz, Dinora, Lineberry, Prohn, Broda and West. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Sciences
Bogenschutz, Matthew
Dinora, Parthenia
Lineberry, Sarah
Prohn, Seb
Broda, Michael
West, Angela
Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services
title Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services
title_full Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services
title_fullStr Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services
title_full_unstemmed Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services
title_short Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services
title_sort promising practices in the frontiers of quality outcome measurement for intellectual and developmental disability services
topic Rehabilitation Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35721804
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.871178
work_keys_str_mv AT bogenschutzmatthew promisingpracticesinthefrontiersofqualityoutcomemeasurementforintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityservices
AT dinoraparthenia promisingpracticesinthefrontiersofqualityoutcomemeasurementforintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityservices
AT lineberrysarah promisingpracticesinthefrontiersofqualityoutcomemeasurementforintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityservices
AT prohnseb promisingpracticesinthefrontiersofqualityoutcomemeasurementforintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityservices
AT brodamichael promisingpracticesinthefrontiersofqualityoutcomemeasurementforintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityservices
AT westangela promisingpracticesinthefrontiersofqualityoutcomemeasurementforintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityservices