Cargando…

Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review

Background: While biomechanical and clinical studies detailing the equivalence and, sometimes, the superiority of cerclage wiring fixation compared to plate fixation in select fractures (Vancouver B1 and C) exist, no studies exist detailing outcomes after cerclage wiring fixation in all Vancouver B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malige, Ajith, Beck, Matthew, Mun, Frederick, Goss, Maddie, Boateng, Henry, Nwachuku, Chinenye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719784
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25063
_version_ 1784728389846827008
author Malige, Ajith
Beck, Matthew
Mun, Frederick
Goss, Maddie
Boateng, Henry
Nwachuku, Chinenye
author_facet Malige, Ajith
Beck, Matthew
Mun, Frederick
Goss, Maddie
Boateng, Henry
Nwachuku, Chinenye
author_sort Malige, Ajith
collection PubMed
description Background: While biomechanical and clinical studies detailing the equivalence and, sometimes, the superiority of cerclage wiring fixation compared to plate fixation in select fractures (Vancouver B1 and C) exist, no studies exist detailing outcomes after cerclage wiring fixation in all Vancouver B fracture types. This study explores whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes between Vancouver B fractures fixed with cerclage wiring and those without. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study reviewed 295 patients from 2007 to 2018 with periprosthetic femur fractures. Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures stabilized utilizing cerclage wiring were identified and compared against fractures stabilized without cerclage wiring, with 33% being B1, 48.4% B2, and 18.6% B3 fractures. Demographics, injury details, fracture classification, surgical details, fracture union, and postoperative complications were recorded for each patient. Results: A majority of our patients were females (65.9%) and were older than 71 years of age (65.6%) without diabetes (63.3%) or smoking history (92.2%). Sixty-nine patients progressed to fracture union (76.7%), two (2.2%) to delayed union, and 19 (21.1%) to nonunion. There was no difference in the union rate (p = 0.98) or time to union (p = 0.91) between the fixation methods. Finally, there was no difference in the infection rate (p = 0.81), re-fracture rate (p = 0.87), or re-operation rate (p = 0.75) between the fixation methods. Conclusion: Periprosthetic femur fractures are common injuries, most commonly occurring after low-energy mechanisms in the elderly female population. While the Vancouver fracture pattern helps to guide the surgical construct used for fixation, the use of cerclage wires does not impact bony union in these injuries. Interestingly, increasing age and female gender were associated with increased union rates. Surgeons should individually consider each patient's demographic as well as fracture type when deciding which construct will achieve stable fixation that allows for fracture healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9201787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92017872022-06-17 Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review Malige, Ajith Beck, Matthew Mun, Frederick Goss, Maddie Boateng, Henry Nwachuku, Chinenye Cureus Orthopedics Background: While biomechanical and clinical studies detailing the equivalence and, sometimes, the superiority of cerclage wiring fixation compared to plate fixation in select fractures (Vancouver B1 and C) exist, no studies exist detailing outcomes after cerclage wiring fixation in all Vancouver B fracture types. This study explores whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes between Vancouver B fractures fixed with cerclage wiring and those without. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study reviewed 295 patients from 2007 to 2018 with periprosthetic femur fractures. Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures stabilized utilizing cerclage wiring were identified and compared against fractures stabilized without cerclage wiring, with 33% being B1, 48.4% B2, and 18.6% B3 fractures. Demographics, injury details, fracture classification, surgical details, fracture union, and postoperative complications were recorded for each patient. Results: A majority of our patients were females (65.9%) and were older than 71 years of age (65.6%) without diabetes (63.3%) or smoking history (92.2%). Sixty-nine patients progressed to fracture union (76.7%), two (2.2%) to delayed union, and 19 (21.1%) to nonunion. There was no difference in the union rate (p = 0.98) or time to union (p = 0.91) between the fixation methods. Finally, there was no difference in the infection rate (p = 0.81), re-fracture rate (p = 0.87), or re-operation rate (p = 0.75) between the fixation methods. Conclusion: Periprosthetic femur fractures are common injuries, most commonly occurring after low-energy mechanisms in the elderly female population. While the Vancouver fracture pattern helps to guide the surgical construct used for fixation, the use of cerclage wires does not impact bony union in these injuries. Interestingly, increasing age and female gender were associated with increased union rates. Surgeons should individually consider each patient's demographic as well as fracture type when deciding which construct will achieve stable fixation that allows for fracture healing. Cureus 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9201787/ /pubmed/35719784 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25063 Text en Copyright © 2022, Malige et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Malige, Ajith
Beck, Matthew
Mun, Frederick
Goss, Maddie
Boateng, Henry
Nwachuku, Chinenye
Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review
title Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review
title_full Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review
title_fullStr Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review
title_full_unstemmed Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review
title_short Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review
title_sort stabilization of vancouver b periprosthetic femur fractures with cerclage wiring: a retrospective chart review
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719784
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25063
work_keys_str_mv AT maligeajith stabilizationofvancouverbperiprostheticfemurfractureswithcerclagewiringaretrospectivechartreview
AT beckmatthew stabilizationofvancouverbperiprostheticfemurfractureswithcerclagewiringaretrospectivechartreview
AT munfrederick stabilizationofvancouverbperiprostheticfemurfractureswithcerclagewiringaretrospectivechartreview
AT gossmaddie stabilizationofvancouverbperiprostheticfemurfractureswithcerclagewiringaretrospectivechartreview
AT boatenghenry stabilizationofvancouverbperiprostheticfemurfractureswithcerclagewiringaretrospectivechartreview
AT nwachukuchinenye stabilizationofvancouverbperiprostheticfemurfractureswithcerclagewiringaretrospectivechartreview