Cargando…

Prone Chest Radiographs: Distinguishing Features and Identification of Support Devices

PURPOSE: Prone position is known to improve acute lung injury, and chest radiographs are often necessary to monitor disease and confirm support device placement. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding radiographs obtained in this position. We evaluated prone radiographs for distinguishi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazarus, Matthew S., Hossain, Rydhwana, Villasana, Geraldine M., Herring, Allison A., Ye, Kenny, Jeudy, Jean, Levsky, Jeffrey M., White, Charles S., Haramati, Linda B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35708780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00408-022-00545-y
_version_ 1784728393528377344
author Lazarus, Matthew S.
Hossain, Rydhwana
Villasana, Geraldine M.
Herring, Allison A.
Ye, Kenny
Jeudy, Jean
Levsky, Jeffrey M.
White, Charles S.
Haramati, Linda B.
author_facet Lazarus, Matthew S.
Hossain, Rydhwana
Villasana, Geraldine M.
Herring, Allison A.
Ye, Kenny
Jeudy, Jean
Levsky, Jeffrey M.
White, Charles S.
Haramati, Linda B.
author_sort Lazarus, Matthew S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Prone position is known to improve acute lung injury, and chest radiographs are often necessary to monitor disease and confirm support device placement. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding radiographs obtained in this position. We evaluated prone radiographs for distinguishing features and ability to identify support devices. METHODS: Pairs of prone and supine radiographs obtained during the COVID-19 pandemic were assessed retrospectively. IRB approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained. Radiographs were assessed for imaging adequacy, distinguishing features, and support device identification (endotracheal tube, enteric tube, or central line). Radiographs were reviewed by ≥ 2 cardiothoracic radiologists. RESULTS: Radiographs from 81 patients (63yo ± 13, 30% women) were reviewed. Prone and supine radiographs were comparable for imaging the lung bases (81% vs. 90%, p = 0.35) and apices (93% vs. 94%, p = 1); prone radiographs more frequently had significant rotation (36% vs. 19%, p = 0.021). To identify prone technique, scapula tip located beyond the rib border was 89% sensitive (95%CI 80–95%) and 85% specific (76–92%), and a fundal stomach bubble was 44% sensitive (33–56%) and 90% specific (81–96%). For women, displaced breast shadow was 46% sensitive (26–67%) and 92% specific (73–99%). Prone and supine radiographs each identified > 99% of support devices. Prone exams trended toward increased rate of malpositioned device (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Scapula position reliably distinguishes prone from supine position; fundal stomach bubble or displaced breast shadow is specific for prone position. Prone radiographs reliably identify line and tube position, which is particularly important as prone patients appear at increased risk for malpositioned devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9201801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92018012022-06-17 Prone Chest Radiographs: Distinguishing Features and Identification of Support Devices Lazarus, Matthew S. Hossain, Rydhwana Villasana, Geraldine M. Herring, Allison A. Ye, Kenny Jeudy, Jean Levsky, Jeffrey M. White, Charles S. Haramati, Linda B. Lung Chest Radiography PURPOSE: Prone position is known to improve acute lung injury, and chest radiographs are often necessary to monitor disease and confirm support device placement. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding radiographs obtained in this position. We evaluated prone radiographs for distinguishing features and ability to identify support devices. METHODS: Pairs of prone and supine radiographs obtained during the COVID-19 pandemic were assessed retrospectively. IRB approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained. Radiographs were assessed for imaging adequacy, distinguishing features, and support device identification (endotracheal tube, enteric tube, or central line). Radiographs were reviewed by ≥ 2 cardiothoracic radiologists. RESULTS: Radiographs from 81 patients (63yo ± 13, 30% women) were reviewed. Prone and supine radiographs were comparable for imaging the lung bases (81% vs. 90%, p = 0.35) and apices (93% vs. 94%, p = 1); prone radiographs more frequently had significant rotation (36% vs. 19%, p = 0.021). To identify prone technique, scapula tip located beyond the rib border was 89% sensitive (95%CI 80–95%) and 85% specific (76–92%), and a fundal stomach bubble was 44% sensitive (33–56%) and 90% specific (81–96%). For women, displaced breast shadow was 46% sensitive (26–67%) and 92% specific (73–99%). Prone and supine radiographs each identified > 99% of support devices. Prone exams trended toward increased rate of malpositioned device (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Scapula position reliably distinguishes prone from supine position; fundal stomach bubble or displaced breast shadow is specific for prone position. Prone radiographs reliably identify line and tube position, which is particularly important as prone patients appear at increased risk for malpositioned devices. Springer US 2022-06-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9201801/ /pubmed/35708780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00408-022-00545-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Chest Radiography
Lazarus, Matthew S.
Hossain, Rydhwana
Villasana, Geraldine M.
Herring, Allison A.
Ye, Kenny
Jeudy, Jean
Levsky, Jeffrey M.
White, Charles S.
Haramati, Linda B.
Prone Chest Radiographs: Distinguishing Features and Identification of Support Devices
title Prone Chest Radiographs: Distinguishing Features and Identification of Support Devices
title_full Prone Chest Radiographs: Distinguishing Features and Identification of Support Devices
title_fullStr Prone Chest Radiographs: Distinguishing Features and Identification of Support Devices
title_full_unstemmed Prone Chest Radiographs: Distinguishing Features and Identification of Support Devices
title_short Prone Chest Radiographs: Distinguishing Features and Identification of Support Devices
title_sort prone chest radiographs: distinguishing features and identification of support devices
topic Chest Radiography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35708780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00408-022-00545-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lazarusmatthews pronechestradiographsdistinguishingfeaturesandidentificationofsupportdevices
AT hossainrydhwana pronechestradiographsdistinguishingfeaturesandidentificationofsupportdevices
AT villasanageraldinem pronechestradiographsdistinguishingfeaturesandidentificationofsupportdevices
AT herringallisona pronechestradiographsdistinguishingfeaturesandidentificationofsupportdevices
AT yekenny pronechestradiographsdistinguishingfeaturesandidentificationofsupportdevices
AT jeudyjean pronechestradiographsdistinguishingfeaturesandidentificationofsupportdevices
AT levskyjeffreym pronechestradiographsdistinguishingfeaturesandidentificationofsupportdevices
AT whitecharless pronechestradiographsdistinguishingfeaturesandidentificationofsupportdevices
AT haramatilindab pronechestradiographsdistinguishingfeaturesandidentificationofsupportdevices