Cargando…
Time of day as a critical variable in biology
BACKGROUND: Circadian rhythms are important for all aspects of biology; virtually every aspect of biological function varies according to time of day. Although this is well known, variation across the day is also often ignored in the design and reporting of research. For this review, we analyzed the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01333-z |
_version_ | 1784728468799356928 |
---|---|
author | Nelson, Randy J. Bumgarner, Jacob R. Liu, Jennifer A. Love, Jharnae A. Meléndez-Fernández, O. Hecmarie Becker-Krail, Darius D. Walker, William H. Walton, James C. DeVries, A. Courtney Prendergast, Brian J. |
author_facet | Nelson, Randy J. Bumgarner, Jacob R. Liu, Jennifer A. Love, Jharnae A. Meléndez-Fernández, O. Hecmarie Becker-Krail, Darius D. Walker, William H. Walton, James C. DeVries, A. Courtney Prendergast, Brian J. |
author_sort | Nelson, Randy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Circadian rhythms are important for all aspects of biology; virtually every aspect of biological function varies according to time of day. Although this is well known, variation across the day is also often ignored in the design and reporting of research. For this review, we analyzed the top 50 cited papers across 10 major domains of the biological sciences in the calendar year 2015. We repeated this analysis for the year 2019, hypothesizing that the awarding of a Nobel Prize in 2017 for achievements in the field of circadian biology would highlight the importance of circadian rhythms for scientists across many disciplines, and improve time-of-day reporting. RESULTS: Our analyses of these 1000 empirical papers, however, revealed that most failed to include sufficient temporal details when describing experimental methods and that few systematic differences in time-of-day reporting existed between 2015 and 2019. Overall, only 6.1% of reports included time-of-day information about experimental measures and manipulations sufficient to permit replication. CONCLUSIONS: Circadian rhythms are a defining feature of biological systems, and knowing when in the circadian day these systems are evaluated is fundamentally important information. Failing to account for time of day hampers reproducibility across laboratories, complicates interpretation of results, and reduces the value of data based predominantly on nocturnal animals when extrapolating to diurnal humans. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-022-01333-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9202143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92021432022-06-17 Time of day as a critical variable in biology Nelson, Randy J. Bumgarner, Jacob R. Liu, Jennifer A. Love, Jharnae A. Meléndez-Fernández, O. Hecmarie Becker-Krail, Darius D. Walker, William H. Walton, James C. DeVries, A. Courtney Prendergast, Brian J. BMC Biol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Circadian rhythms are important for all aspects of biology; virtually every aspect of biological function varies according to time of day. Although this is well known, variation across the day is also often ignored in the design and reporting of research. For this review, we analyzed the top 50 cited papers across 10 major domains of the biological sciences in the calendar year 2015. We repeated this analysis for the year 2019, hypothesizing that the awarding of a Nobel Prize in 2017 for achievements in the field of circadian biology would highlight the importance of circadian rhythms for scientists across many disciplines, and improve time-of-day reporting. RESULTS: Our analyses of these 1000 empirical papers, however, revealed that most failed to include sufficient temporal details when describing experimental methods and that few systematic differences in time-of-day reporting existed between 2015 and 2019. Overall, only 6.1% of reports included time-of-day information about experimental measures and manipulations sufficient to permit replication. CONCLUSIONS: Circadian rhythms are a defining feature of biological systems, and knowing when in the circadian day these systems are evaluated is fundamentally important information. Failing to account for time of day hampers reproducibility across laboratories, complicates interpretation of results, and reduces the value of data based predominantly on nocturnal animals when extrapolating to diurnal humans. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-022-01333-z. BioMed Central 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9202143/ /pubmed/35705939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01333-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Nelson, Randy J. Bumgarner, Jacob R. Liu, Jennifer A. Love, Jharnae A. Meléndez-Fernández, O. Hecmarie Becker-Krail, Darius D. Walker, William H. Walton, James C. DeVries, A. Courtney Prendergast, Brian J. Time of day as a critical variable in biology |
title | Time of day as a critical variable in biology |
title_full | Time of day as a critical variable in biology |
title_fullStr | Time of day as a critical variable in biology |
title_full_unstemmed | Time of day as a critical variable in biology |
title_short | Time of day as a critical variable in biology |
title_sort | time of day as a critical variable in biology |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01333-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nelsonrandyj timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology AT bumgarnerjacobr timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology AT liujennifera timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology AT lovejharnaea timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology AT melendezfernandezohecmarie timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology AT beckerkraildariusd timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology AT walkerwilliamh timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology AT waltonjamesc timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology AT devriesacourtney timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology AT prendergastbrianj timeofdayasacriticalvariableinbiology |