Cargando…
Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative glycemic variability is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity and an increased incidence of hyperglycemia after cardiac surgery. Accordingly, clinicians tend to use a tight glucose control to maintain perioperative blood glucose levels and therefore th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01721-6 |
_version_ | 1784728481816379392 |
---|---|
author | Kaddoum, Roland Khalili, Amro Shebbo, Fadia M. Ghanem, Nathalie Daher, Layal Abou Ali, Arwa Bou Chehade, Nour El Hage Maroun, Patrick Aouad, Marie T. |
author_facet | Kaddoum, Roland Khalili, Amro Shebbo, Fadia M. Ghanem, Nathalie Daher, Layal Abou Ali, Arwa Bou Chehade, Nour El Hage Maroun, Patrick Aouad, Marie T. |
author_sort | Kaddoum, Roland |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intraoperative glycemic variability is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity and an increased incidence of hyperglycemia after cardiac surgery. Accordingly, clinicians tend to use a tight glucose control to maintain perioperative blood glucose levels and therefore the need to develop a less laborious automated glucose control system is important especially in diabetic patients at a higher risk of developing complications. METHODS: Patients, aged between 40 and 75 years old, undergoing open heart surgery were randomized to either an automated protocol (experimental) or to the conventional technique at our institution (control). RESULTS: We showed that the percentage of patients maintained between 7.8–10 mmol.l(−1) was not statistically different between the two groups, however, through an additional analysis, we showed that the proportion of patients whose glucose levels maintained between a safety level of 6.7–10 mmol.l(−1) was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to control group, 14 (26.7%) vs 5 (17.2%) P = 0.025. In addition, the percentage of patients who had at least one intraoperative hyperglycemic event was significantly higher in the control group compared to the experimental group, 17 (58.6%) vs 5 (16.7%), P < 0.001 with no hypoglycemic events in the experimental group compared to two events in the control group. We also showed that longer surgeries can benefit more from using the automated glucose control system, particularly surgeries lasting more than 210 min. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the automated glucose control pump in diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgeries maintained most of the patients within a predefined glucose range with a very low incidence of hyperglycemic events and no incidence of hypoglycemic events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT #NCT03314272, Principal investigator Roland Kaddoum, date of registration: 19/10/2017). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9202201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92022012022-06-17 Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery Kaddoum, Roland Khalili, Amro Shebbo, Fadia M. Ghanem, Nathalie Daher, Layal Abou Ali, Arwa Bou Chehade, Nour El Hage Maroun, Patrick Aouad, Marie T. BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Intraoperative glycemic variability is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity and an increased incidence of hyperglycemia after cardiac surgery. Accordingly, clinicians tend to use a tight glucose control to maintain perioperative blood glucose levels and therefore the need to develop a less laborious automated glucose control system is important especially in diabetic patients at a higher risk of developing complications. METHODS: Patients, aged between 40 and 75 years old, undergoing open heart surgery were randomized to either an automated protocol (experimental) or to the conventional technique at our institution (control). RESULTS: We showed that the percentage of patients maintained between 7.8–10 mmol.l(−1) was not statistically different between the two groups, however, through an additional analysis, we showed that the proportion of patients whose glucose levels maintained between a safety level of 6.7–10 mmol.l(−1) was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to control group, 14 (26.7%) vs 5 (17.2%) P = 0.025. In addition, the percentage of patients who had at least one intraoperative hyperglycemic event was significantly higher in the control group compared to the experimental group, 17 (58.6%) vs 5 (16.7%), P < 0.001 with no hypoglycemic events in the experimental group compared to two events in the control group. We also showed that longer surgeries can benefit more from using the automated glucose control system, particularly surgeries lasting more than 210 min. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the automated glucose control pump in diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgeries maintained most of the patients within a predefined glucose range with a very low incidence of hyperglycemic events and no incidence of hypoglycemic events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT #NCT03314272, Principal investigator Roland Kaddoum, date of registration: 19/10/2017). BioMed Central 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9202201/ /pubmed/35710339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01721-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kaddoum, Roland Khalili, Amro Shebbo, Fadia M. Ghanem, Nathalie Daher, Layal Abou Ali, Arwa Bou Chehade, Nour El Hage Maroun, Patrick Aouad, Marie T. Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery |
title | Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery |
title_full | Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery |
title_fullStr | Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery |
title_short | Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery |
title_sort | automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01721-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaddoumroland automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery AT khaliliamro automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery AT shebbofadiam automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery AT ghanemnathalie automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery AT daherlayalabou automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery AT aliarwabou automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery AT chehadenourelhage automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery AT marounpatrick automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery AT aouadmariet automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery |