Cargando…

Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative glycemic variability is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity and an increased incidence of hyperglycemia after cardiac surgery. Accordingly, clinicians tend to use a tight glucose control to maintain perioperative blood glucose levels and therefore th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaddoum, Roland, Khalili, Amro, Shebbo, Fadia M., Ghanem, Nathalie, Daher, Layal Abou, Ali, Arwa Bou, Chehade, Nour El Hage, Maroun, Patrick, Aouad, Marie T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01721-6
_version_ 1784728481816379392
author Kaddoum, Roland
Khalili, Amro
Shebbo, Fadia M.
Ghanem, Nathalie
Daher, Layal Abou
Ali, Arwa Bou
Chehade, Nour El Hage
Maroun, Patrick
Aouad, Marie T.
author_facet Kaddoum, Roland
Khalili, Amro
Shebbo, Fadia M.
Ghanem, Nathalie
Daher, Layal Abou
Ali, Arwa Bou
Chehade, Nour El Hage
Maroun, Patrick
Aouad, Marie T.
author_sort Kaddoum, Roland
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraoperative glycemic variability is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity and an increased incidence of hyperglycemia after cardiac surgery. Accordingly, clinicians tend to use a tight glucose control to maintain perioperative blood glucose levels and therefore the need to develop a less laborious automated glucose control system is important especially in diabetic patients at a higher risk of developing complications. METHODS: Patients, aged between 40 and 75 years old, undergoing open heart surgery were randomized to either an automated protocol (experimental) or to the conventional technique at our institution (control). RESULTS: We showed that the percentage of patients maintained between 7.8–10 mmol.l(−1) was not statistically different between the two groups, however, through an additional analysis, we showed that the proportion of patients whose glucose levels maintained between a safety level of 6.7–10 mmol.l(−1) was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to control group, 14 (26.7%) vs 5 (17.2%) P = 0.025. In addition, the percentage of patients who had at least one intraoperative hyperglycemic event was significantly higher in the control group compared to the experimental group, 17 (58.6%) vs 5 (16.7%), P < 0.001 with no hypoglycemic events in the experimental group compared to two events in the control group. We also showed that longer surgeries can benefit more from using the automated glucose control system, particularly surgeries lasting more than 210 min. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the automated glucose control pump in diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgeries maintained most of the patients within a predefined glucose range with a very low incidence of hyperglycemic events and no incidence of hypoglycemic events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT #NCT03314272, Principal investigator Roland Kaddoum, date of registration: 19/10/2017).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9202201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92022012022-06-17 Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery Kaddoum, Roland Khalili, Amro Shebbo, Fadia M. Ghanem, Nathalie Daher, Layal Abou Ali, Arwa Bou Chehade, Nour El Hage Maroun, Patrick Aouad, Marie T. BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Intraoperative glycemic variability is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity and an increased incidence of hyperglycemia after cardiac surgery. Accordingly, clinicians tend to use a tight glucose control to maintain perioperative blood glucose levels and therefore the need to develop a less laborious automated glucose control system is important especially in diabetic patients at a higher risk of developing complications. METHODS: Patients, aged between 40 and 75 years old, undergoing open heart surgery were randomized to either an automated protocol (experimental) or to the conventional technique at our institution (control). RESULTS: We showed that the percentage of patients maintained between 7.8–10 mmol.l(−1) was not statistically different between the two groups, however, through an additional analysis, we showed that the proportion of patients whose glucose levels maintained between a safety level of 6.7–10 mmol.l(−1) was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to control group, 14 (26.7%) vs 5 (17.2%) P = 0.025. In addition, the percentage of patients who had at least one intraoperative hyperglycemic event was significantly higher in the control group compared to the experimental group, 17 (58.6%) vs 5 (16.7%), P < 0.001 with no hypoglycemic events in the experimental group compared to two events in the control group. We also showed that longer surgeries can benefit more from using the automated glucose control system, particularly surgeries lasting more than 210 min. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the automated glucose control pump in diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgeries maintained most of the patients within a predefined glucose range with a very low incidence of hyperglycemic events and no incidence of hypoglycemic events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT #NCT03314272, Principal investigator Roland Kaddoum, date of registration: 19/10/2017). BioMed Central 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9202201/ /pubmed/35710339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01721-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kaddoum, Roland
Khalili, Amro
Shebbo, Fadia M.
Ghanem, Nathalie
Daher, Layal Abou
Ali, Arwa Bou
Chehade, Nour El Hage
Maroun, Patrick
Aouad, Marie T.
Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery
title Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery
title_full Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery
title_fullStr Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery
title_full_unstemmed Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery
title_short Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery
title_sort automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01721-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kaddoumroland automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT khaliliamro automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT shebbofadiam automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT ghanemnathalie automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT daherlayalabou automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT aliarwabou automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT chehadenourelhage automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT marounpatrick automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT aouadmariet automatedversusconventionalperioperativeglycemiccontrolinadultdiabeticpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery