Cargando…

Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration

[Image: see text] Biopolymer nanofiber membranes are attracting interest as promising biomaterial scaffolds with a remarkable range of structural and functional performances for guided bone regeneration (GBR). In this study, tussah silk nanofiber (TSn) and Bombyx mori silk nanofiber (BSn) membranes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yumao, Chen, Ming, Gao, Yang, Zhang, Feng, Jin, Min, Lu, Shijun, Han, Minxuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35721914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01784
_version_ 1784728496931602432
author Chen, Yumao
Chen, Ming
Gao, Yang
Zhang, Feng
Jin, Min
Lu, Shijun
Han, Minxuan
author_facet Chen, Yumao
Chen, Ming
Gao, Yang
Zhang, Feng
Jin, Min
Lu, Shijun
Han, Minxuan
author_sort Chen, Yumao
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Biopolymer nanofiber membranes are attracting interest as promising biomaterial scaffolds with a remarkable range of structural and functional performances for guided bone regeneration (GBR). In this study, tussah silk nanofiber (TSn) and Bombyx mori silk nanofiber (BSn) membranes were prepared by physical shearing. The diameters of the TSn and BSn membranes were 146.09 ± 63.56 and 120.99 ± 91.32 nm, respectively. TSn showed a Young’s modulus of 3.61 ± 0.64 GPa and a tensile strength of 74.27 ± 5.19 MPa, which were superior to those of BSn, with a Young’s modulus of 0.16 ± 0.03 GPa and a tensile strength of 4.86 ± 0.61 MPa. The potential of TSn and BSn membranes to guide bone regeneration was explored. In vitro, the TSn membrane exhibited significantly higher cell proliferation for MC3T3-E1 cells than the BSn membrane. In a cranial bone defect in a rat model, the TSn and BSn membranes displayed superior bone regeneration compared to the control because the membrane prevented the ingrowth of soft tissue to the defective area. Compared to the BSn membrane, the TSn membrane improved damaged bone regeneration, presumably due to its superior mechanical properties, high osteoconductivity, and increased cell proliferation. The TSn membrane has a bionic structure, excellent mechanical properties, and greater biocompatibility, making it an ideal candidate for GBR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9202271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92022712022-06-17 Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration Chen, Yumao Chen, Ming Gao, Yang Zhang, Feng Jin, Min Lu, Shijun Han, Minxuan ACS Omega [Image: see text] Biopolymer nanofiber membranes are attracting interest as promising biomaterial scaffolds with a remarkable range of structural and functional performances for guided bone regeneration (GBR). In this study, tussah silk nanofiber (TSn) and Bombyx mori silk nanofiber (BSn) membranes were prepared by physical shearing. The diameters of the TSn and BSn membranes were 146.09 ± 63.56 and 120.99 ± 91.32 nm, respectively. TSn showed a Young’s modulus of 3.61 ± 0.64 GPa and a tensile strength of 74.27 ± 5.19 MPa, which were superior to those of BSn, with a Young’s modulus of 0.16 ± 0.03 GPa and a tensile strength of 4.86 ± 0.61 MPa. The potential of TSn and BSn membranes to guide bone regeneration was explored. In vitro, the TSn membrane exhibited significantly higher cell proliferation for MC3T3-E1 cells than the BSn membrane. In a cranial bone defect in a rat model, the TSn and BSn membranes displayed superior bone regeneration compared to the control because the membrane prevented the ingrowth of soft tissue to the defective area. Compared to the BSn membrane, the TSn membrane improved damaged bone regeneration, presumably due to its superior mechanical properties, high osteoconductivity, and increased cell proliferation. The TSn membrane has a bionic structure, excellent mechanical properties, and greater biocompatibility, making it an ideal candidate for GBR. American Chemical Society 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9202271/ /pubmed/35721914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01784 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Chen, Yumao
Chen, Ming
Gao, Yang
Zhang, Feng
Jin, Min
Lu, Shijun
Han, Minxuan
Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
title Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_full Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_fullStr Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_short Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_sort biological efficacy comparison of natural tussah silk and mulberry silk nanofiber membranes for guided bone regeneration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35721914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01784
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyumao biologicalefficacycomparisonofnaturaltussahsilkandmulberrysilknanofibermembranesforguidedboneregeneration
AT chenming biologicalefficacycomparisonofnaturaltussahsilkandmulberrysilknanofibermembranesforguidedboneregeneration
AT gaoyang biologicalefficacycomparisonofnaturaltussahsilkandmulberrysilknanofibermembranesforguidedboneregeneration
AT zhangfeng biologicalefficacycomparisonofnaturaltussahsilkandmulberrysilknanofibermembranesforguidedboneregeneration
AT jinmin biologicalefficacycomparisonofnaturaltussahsilkandmulberrysilknanofibermembranesforguidedboneregeneration
AT lushijun biologicalefficacycomparisonofnaturaltussahsilkandmulberrysilknanofibermembranesforguidedboneregeneration
AT hanminxuan biologicalefficacycomparisonofnaturaltussahsilkandmulberrysilknanofibermembranesforguidedboneregeneration