Cargando…

Determination of the Gas–Oil Ratio below the Bubble Point Pressure Using the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)

[Image: see text] Determining the solution gas–oil ratio (R(s)) below the bubble point is a vital requirement that aids in multiple production engineering and reservoir analysis issues. Currently, there are some models available for the determination of the solution gas–oil ratio under the bubble po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayoub Mohammed, Mohammed Abdalla, Alakbari, Fahd Saeed, Nathan, Clarence Prebla, Mohyaldinn, Mysara Eissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35721985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01496
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] Determining the solution gas–oil ratio (R(s)) below the bubble point is a vital requirement that aids in multiple production engineering and reservoir analysis issues. Currently, there are some models available for the determination of the solution gas–oil ratio under the bubble point. However, they still may prove unreliable due to the applied assumptions and their specification to operate only under a particular range of data. In this study, the neuro-fuzzy, i.e., the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach, is utilized to develop an accurate and dependable model for determining the R(s) below the bubble point pressure. A total of 376 pressure–volume–temperature datasets from Sudanese oil fields were used to establish the proposed ANFIS model. The trend analysis was applied to affirm the proper relationships between the inputs and outputs. Furthermore, using different statistical error analyses, the developed model was benchmarked against widely used empirical methods to evaluate the proposed method’s performance in predicting the R(s) at pressures below the bubble point. The proposed ANFIS model performs with an average absolute percent relative error of 10.60% and a correlation coefficient of 99.04%, surpassing the previously studied correlations.