Cargando…
A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface
PURPOSE: To report the long-term observations of the electrode–tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. METHODS: Four subjects (S1–4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.6.12 |
_version_ | 1784728512750419968 |
---|---|
author | Titchener, Samuel A. Nayagam, David A. X. Kvansakul, Jessica Kolic, Maria Baglin, Elizabeth K. Abbott, Carla J. McGuinness, Myra B. Ayton, Lauren N. Luu, Chi D. Greenstein, Steven Kentler, William G. Shivdasani, Mohit N. Allen, Penelope J. Petoe, Matthew A. |
author_facet | Titchener, Samuel A. Nayagam, David A. X. Kvansakul, Jessica Kolic, Maria Baglin, Elizabeth K. Abbott, Carla J. McGuinness, Myra B. Ayton, Lauren N. Luu, Chi D. Greenstein, Steven Kentler, William G. Shivdasani, Mohit N. Allen, Penelope J. Petoe, Matthew A. |
author_sort | Titchener, Samuel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To report the long-term observations of the electrode–tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. METHODS: Four subjects (S1–4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode–retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm(2) per phase. RESULTS: Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode–retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode–retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; P(gradient) > 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode–retina distance persisted (P < 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P < 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode–retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm(2) per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9202334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92023342022-06-17 A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface Titchener, Samuel A. Nayagam, David A. X. Kvansakul, Jessica Kolic, Maria Baglin, Elizabeth K. Abbott, Carla J. McGuinness, Myra B. Ayton, Lauren N. Luu, Chi D. Greenstein, Steven Kentler, William G. Shivdasani, Mohit N. Allen, Penelope J. Petoe, Matthew A. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To report the long-term observations of the electrode–tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. METHODS: Four subjects (S1–4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode–retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm(2) per phase. RESULTS: Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode–retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode–retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; P(gradient) > 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode–retina distance persisted (P < 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P < 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode–retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm(2) per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9202334/ /pubmed/35696133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.6.12 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Titchener, Samuel A. Nayagam, David A. X. Kvansakul, Jessica Kolic, Maria Baglin, Elizabeth K. Abbott, Carla J. McGuinness, Myra B. Ayton, Lauren N. Luu, Chi D. Greenstein, Steven Kentler, William G. Shivdasani, Mohit N. Allen, Penelope J. Petoe, Matthew A. A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface |
title | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface |
title_full | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface |
title_fullStr | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface |
title_full_unstemmed | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface |
title_short | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface |
title_sort | second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: long-term observation of the electrode–tissue interface |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.6.12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT titchenersamuela asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT nayagamdavidax asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT kvansakuljessica asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT kolicmaria asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT baglinelizabethk asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT abbottcarlaj asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT mcguinnessmyrab asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT aytonlaurenn asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT luuchid asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT greensteinsteven asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT kentlerwilliamg asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT shivdasanimohitn asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT allenpenelopej asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT petoematthewa asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT titchenersamuela secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT nayagamdavidax secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT kvansakuljessica secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT kolicmaria secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT baglinelizabethk secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT abbottcarlaj secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT mcguinnessmyrab secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT aytonlaurenn secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT luuchid secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT greensteinsteven secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT kentlerwilliamg secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT shivdasanimohitn secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT allenpenelopej secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface AT petoematthewa secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface |