Cargando…

A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface

PURPOSE: To report the long-term observations of the electrode–tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. METHODS: Four subjects (S1–4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Titchener, Samuel A., Nayagam, David A. X., Kvansakul, Jessica, Kolic, Maria, Baglin, Elizabeth K., Abbott, Carla J., McGuinness, Myra B., Ayton, Lauren N., Luu, Chi D., Greenstein, Steven, Kentler, William G., Shivdasani, Mohit N., Allen, Penelope J., Petoe, Matthew A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.6.12
_version_ 1784728512750419968
author Titchener, Samuel A.
Nayagam, David A. X.
Kvansakul, Jessica
Kolic, Maria
Baglin, Elizabeth K.
Abbott, Carla J.
McGuinness, Myra B.
Ayton, Lauren N.
Luu, Chi D.
Greenstein, Steven
Kentler, William G.
Shivdasani, Mohit N.
Allen, Penelope J.
Petoe, Matthew A.
author_facet Titchener, Samuel A.
Nayagam, David A. X.
Kvansakul, Jessica
Kolic, Maria
Baglin, Elizabeth K.
Abbott, Carla J.
McGuinness, Myra B.
Ayton, Lauren N.
Luu, Chi D.
Greenstein, Steven
Kentler, William G.
Shivdasani, Mohit N.
Allen, Penelope J.
Petoe, Matthew A.
author_sort Titchener, Samuel A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report the long-term observations of the electrode–tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. METHODS: Four subjects (S1–4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode–retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm(2) per phase. RESULTS: Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode–retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode–retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; P(gradient) > 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode–retina distance persisted (P < 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P < 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode–retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm(2) per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9202334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92023342022-06-17 A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface Titchener, Samuel A. Nayagam, David A. X. Kvansakul, Jessica Kolic, Maria Baglin, Elizabeth K. Abbott, Carla J. McGuinness, Myra B. Ayton, Lauren N. Luu, Chi D. Greenstein, Steven Kentler, William G. Shivdasani, Mohit N. Allen, Penelope J. Petoe, Matthew A. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To report the long-term observations of the electrode–tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. METHODS: Four subjects (S1–4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode–retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm(2) per phase. RESULTS: Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode–retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode–retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; P(gradient) > 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode–retina distance persisted (P < 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P < 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode–retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm(2) per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9202334/ /pubmed/35696133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.6.12 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Titchener, Samuel A.
Nayagam, David A. X.
Kvansakul, Jessica
Kolic, Maria
Baglin, Elizabeth K.
Abbott, Carla J.
McGuinness, Myra B.
Ayton, Lauren N.
Luu, Chi D.
Greenstein, Steven
Kentler, William G.
Shivdasani, Mohit N.
Allen, Penelope J.
Petoe, Matthew A.
A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface
title A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface
title_full A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface
title_fullStr A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface
title_full_unstemmed A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface
title_short A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue Interface
title_sort second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: long-term observation of the electrode–tissue interface
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.6.12
work_keys_str_mv AT titchenersamuela asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT nayagamdavidax asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT kvansakuljessica asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT kolicmaria asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT baglinelizabethk asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT abbottcarlaj asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT mcguinnessmyrab asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT aytonlaurenn asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT luuchid asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT greensteinsteven asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT kentlerwilliamg asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT shivdasanimohitn asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT allenpenelopej asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT petoematthewa asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT titchenersamuela secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT nayagamdavidax secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT kvansakuljessica secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT kolicmaria secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT baglinelizabethk secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT abbottcarlaj secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT mcguinnessmyrab secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT aytonlaurenn secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT luuchid secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT greensteinsteven secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT kentlerwilliamg secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT shivdasanimohitn secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT allenpenelopej secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface
AT petoematthewa secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesislongtermobservationoftheelectrodetissueinterface