Cargando…

Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility

[Image: see text] The binding free energy between a ligand and its target protein is an essential quantity to know at all stages of the drug discovery pipeline. Assessing this value computationally can offer insight into where efforts should be focused in the pursuit of effective therapeutics to tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wade, Alexander D., Bhati, Agastya P., Wan, Shunzhou, Coveney, Peter V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35609233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00114
_version_ 1784728516873420800
author Wade, Alexander D.
Bhati, Agastya P.
Wan, Shunzhou
Coveney, Peter V.
author_facet Wade, Alexander D.
Bhati, Agastya P.
Wan, Shunzhou
Coveney, Peter V.
author_sort Wade, Alexander D.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The binding free energy between a ligand and its target protein is an essential quantity to know at all stages of the drug discovery pipeline. Assessing this value computationally can offer insight into where efforts should be focused in the pursuit of effective therapeutics to treat a myriad of diseases. In this work, we examine the computation of alchemical relative binding free energies with an eye for assessing reproducibility across popular molecular dynamics packages and free energy estimators. The focus of this work is on 54 ligand transformations from a diverse set of protein targets: MCL1, PTP1B, TYK2, CDK2, and thrombin. These targets are studied with three popular molecular dynamics packages: OpenMM, NAMD2, and NAMD3 alpha. Trajectories collected with these packages are used to compare relative binding free energies calculated with thermodynamic integration and free energy perturbation methods. The resulting binding free energies show good agreement between molecular dynamics packages with an average mean unsigned error between them of 0.50 kcal/mol. The correlation between packages is very good, with the lowest Spearman’s, Pearson’s and Kendall’s tau correlation coefficients being 0.92, 0.91, and 0.76, respectively. Agreement between thermodynamic integration and free energy perturbation is shown to be very good when using ensemble averaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9202356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92023562022-06-17 Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility Wade, Alexander D. Bhati, Agastya P. Wan, Shunzhou Coveney, Peter V. J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] The binding free energy between a ligand and its target protein is an essential quantity to know at all stages of the drug discovery pipeline. Assessing this value computationally can offer insight into where efforts should be focused in the pursuit of effective therapeutics to treat a myriad of diseases. In this work, we examine the computation of alchemical relative binding free energies with an eye for assessing reproducibility across popular molecular dynamics packages and free energy estimators. The focus of this work is on 54 ligand transformations from a diverse set of protein targets: MCL1, PTP1B, TYK2, CDK2, and thrombin. These targets are studied with three popular molecular dynamics packages: OpenMM, NAMD2, and NAMD3 alpha. Trajectories collected with these packages are used to compare relative binding free energies calculated with thermodynamic integration and free energy perturbation methods. The resulting binding free energies show good agreement between molecular dynamics packages with an average mean unsigned error between them of 0.50 kcal/mol. The correlation between packages is very good, with the lowest Spearman’s, Pearson’s and Kendall’s tau correlation coefficients being 0.92, 0.91, and 0.76, respectively. Agreement between thermodynamic integration and free energy perturbation is shown to be very good when using ensemble averaging. American Chemical Society 2022-05-24 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9202356/ /pubmed/35609233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00114 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Wade, Alexander D.
Bhati, Agastya P.
Wan, Shunzhou
Coveney, Peter V.
Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility
title Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility
title_full Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility
title_fullStr Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility
title_full_unstemmed Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility
title_short Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility
title_sort alchemical free energy estimators and molecular dynamics engines: accuracy, precision, and reproducibility
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35609233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00114
work_keys_str_mv AT wadealexanderd alchemicalfreeenergyestimatorsandmoleculardynamicsenginesaccuracyprecisionandreproducibility
AT bhatiagastyap alchemicalfreeenergyestimatorsandmoleculardynamicsenginesaccuracyprecisionandreproducibility
AT wanshunzhou alchemicalfreeenergyestimatorsandmoleculardynamicsenginesaccuracyprecisionandreproducibility
AT coveneypeterv alchemicalfreeenergyestimatorsandmoleculardynamicsenginesaccuracyprecisionandreproducibility