Cargando…

The psychometric properties of the grazing questionnaire in an obesity sample with and without binge eating disorder

BACKGROUND: Despite being the first validated measure of grazing, the Grazing Questionnaire (GQ) has not been investigated among individuals with obesity. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the GQ in an obesity sample. METHODS: Participants (N = 259) were re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spirou, Dean, Raman, Jayanthi, Leith, Mimi, Collison, James, Bishay, Ramy H., Ahlenstiel, Golo, Hay, Phillipa, Smith, Evelyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00604-y
_version_ 1784728542558289920
author Spirou, Dean
Raman, Jayanthi
Leith, Mimi
Collison, James
Bishay, Ramy H.
Ahlenstiel, Golo
Hay, Phillipa
Smith, Evelyn
author_facet Spirou, Dean
Raman, Jayanthi
Leith, Mimi
Collison, James
Bishay, Ramy H.
Ahlenstiel, Golo
Hay, Phillipa
Smith, Evelyn
author_sort Spirou, Dean
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite being the first validated measure of grazing, the Grazing Questionnaire (GQ) has not been investigated among individuals with obesity. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the GQ in an obesity sample. METHODS: Participants (N = 259) were recruited from community and clinical settings in Australia. The sample comprised adults with normal weight (n = 77) and obesity (n = 182). A portion of individuals with obesity (n = 102) had binge eating disorder (BED). Data from the obesity group was examined to establish the factor structure, validity, and reliability of the GQ. A one-way ANOVA with planned contrasts was conducted to compare scores on the GQ across groups. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the 2-factor model of the GQ was the best model fit for individuals with obesity. The GQ demonstrated high internal consistency, test–retest reliability over 3 months, and convergent and divergent validity. As hypothesised, the obesity group had significantly higher scores on the GQ than the normal weight group, while the obesity with BED group had significantly higher scores than the obesity without BED group. CONCLUSION: This was the first study to investigate the psychometric properties of the GQ in an obesity sample. Overall, findings indicated that the GQ is a psychometrically sound measure of grazing among individuals with obesity. These findings provide further support for two distinct subtypes of grazing and highlight the importance of increased assessment and management of grazing behaviours for individuals with obesity and eating disorders. PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Maintaining a healthy weight is one of the greatest challenges for individuals with obesity. Certain eating patterns such as grazing may contribute to difficulties in weight management. Grazing is the repetitive and unplanned eating of small amounts of food that is not related to feeling hungry. Researchers and clinicians often use self-report questionnaires to measure grazing. However, the first validated questionnaire of grazing has not been investigated among individuals with obesity. Therefore, the goal of this study was to examine and validate the Grazing Questionnaire in individuals with obesity. Overall, our results showed that the Grazing Questionnaire is a valid and reliable self-report measure of grazing in individuals with obesity. Similar to previous research, we found that there are two subtypes of grazing. The first subtype involves continuous, unplanned eating. The second subtype is associated with a sense of loss of control over eating. We also found that people with obesity and binge eating disorder graze more than people with obesity that do not have binge eating disorder, while both groups graze more than individuals with normal weight. We recommend that clinicians routinely assess and treat unhelpful grazing patterns when working with individuals with obesity and eating disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9202494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92024942022-06-17 The psychometric properties of the grazing questionnaire in an obesity sample with and without binge eating disorder Spirou, Dean Raman, Jayanthi Leith, Mimi Collison, James Bishay, Ramy H. Ahlenstiel, Golo Hay, Phillipa Smith, Evelyn J Eat Disord Research BACKGROUND: Despite being the first validated measure of grazing, the Grazing Questionnaire (GQ) has not been investigated among individuals with obesity. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the GQ in an obesity sample. METHODS: Participants (N = 259) were recruited from community and clinical settings in Australia. The sample comprised adults with normal weight (n = 77) and obesity (n = 182). A portion of individuals with obesity (n = 102) had binge eating disorder (BED). Data from the obesity group was examined to establish the factor structure, validity, and reliability of the GQ. A one-way ANOVA with planned contrasts was conducted to compare scores on the GQ across groups. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the 2-factor model of the GQ was the best model fit for individuals with obesity. The GQ demonstrated high internal consistency, test–retest reliability over 3 months, and convergent and divergent validity. As hypothesised, the obesity group had significantly higher scores on the GQ than the normal weight group, while the obesity with BED group had significantly higher scores than the obesity without BED group. CONCLUSION: This was the first study to investigate the psychometric properties of the GQ in an obesity sample. Overall, findings indicated that the GQ is a psychometrically sound measure of grazing among individuals with obesity. These findings provide further support for two distinct subtypes of grazing and highlight the importance of increased assessment and management of grazing behaviours for individuals with obesity and eating disorders. PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Maintaining a healthy weight is one of the greatest challenges for individuals with obesity. Certain eating patterns such as grazing may contribute to difficulties in weight management. Grazing is the repetitive and unplanned eating of small amounts of food that is not related to feeling hungry. Researchers and clinicians often use self-report questionnaires to measure grazing. However, the first validated questionnaire of grazing has not been investigated among individuals with obesity. Therefore, the goal of this study was to examine and validate the Grazing Questionnaire in individuals with obesity. Overall, our results showed that the Grazing Questionnaire is a valid and reliable self-report measure of grazing in individuals with obesity. Similar to previous research, we found that there are two subtypes of grazing. The first subtype involves continuous, unplanned eating. The second subtype is associated with a sense of loss of control over eating. We also found that people with obesity and binge eating disorder graze more than people with obesity that do not have binge eating disorder, while both groups graze more than individuals with normal weight. We recommend that clinicians routinely assess and treat unhelpful grazing patterns when working with individuals with obesity and eating disorders. BioMed Central 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9202494/ /pubmed/35710487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00604-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Spirou, Dean
Raman, Jayanthi
Leith, Mimi
Collison, James
Bishay, Ramy H.
Ahlenstiel, Golo
Hay, Phillipa
Smith, Evelyn
The psychometric properties of the grazing questionnaire in an obesity sample with and without binge eating disorder
title The psychometric properties of the grazing questionnaire in an obesity sample with and without binge eating disorder
title_full The psychometric properties of the grazing questionnaire in an obesity sample with and without binge eating disorder
title_fullStr The psychometric properties of the grazing questionnaire in an obesity sample with and without binge eating disorder
title_full_unstemmed The psychometric properties of the grazing questionnaire in an obesity sample with and without binge eating disorder
title_short The psychometric properties of the grazing questionnaire in an obesity sample with and without binge eating disorder
title_sort psychometric properties of the grazing questionnaire in an obesity sample with and without binge eating disorder
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00604-y
work_keys_str_mv AT spiroudean thepsychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT ramanjayanthi thepsychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT leithmimi thepsychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT collisonjames thepsychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT bishayramyh thepsychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT ahlenstielgolo thepsychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT hayphillipa thepsychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT smithevelyn thepsychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT spiroudean psychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT ramanjayanthi psychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT leithmimi psychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT collisonjames psychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT bishayramyh psychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT ahlenstielgolo psychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT hayphillipa psychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder
AT smithevelyn psychometricpropertiesofthegrazingquestionnaireinanobesitysamplewithandwithoutbingeeatingdisorder