Cargando…
The Scientific Method as a Scaffold to Enhance Communication Skills in Chemistry
[Image: see text] Scientific success in the field of chemistry depends upon the mastery of a wide range of soft skills, most notably scientific writing and speaking. However, training for scientific communication is typically limited at the undergraduate level, where students struggle to express the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00113 |
_version_ | 1784728556048220160 |
---|---|
author | Montgomery, Thomas D. Buchbinder, Joanne Rae Gawalt, Ellen S. Iuliucci, Robbie J. Koch, Andrew S. Kotsikorou, Evangelia Lackey, Patrick E. Lim, Min Soo Rohde, Jeffrey Joseph Rupprecht, Alexander J. Srnec, Matthew N. Vernier, Brandon Evanseck, Jeffrey D. |
author_facet | Montgomery, Thomas D. Buchbinder, Joanne Rae Gawalt, Ellen S. Iuliucci, Robbie J. Koch, Andrew S. Kotsikorou, Evangelia Lackey, Patrick E. Lim, Min Soo Rohde, Jeffrey Joseph Rupprecht, Alexander J. Srnec, Matthew N. Vernier, Brandon Evanseck, Jeffrey D. |
author_sort | Montgomery, Thomas D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Scientific success in the field of chemistry depends upon the mastery of a wide range of soft skills, most notably scientific writing and speaking. However, training for scientific communication is typically limited at the undergraduate level, where students struggle to express themselves in a clear and logical manner. The underlying issue is deeper than basic technical skills; rather, it is a problem of students’ unawareness of a fundamental and strategic framework for writing and speaking with a purpose. The methodology has been implemented for individual mentorship and in our regional summer research program to deliver a blueprint of thought and reasoning that endows students with the confidence and skills to become more effective communicators. Our didactic process intertwines undergraduate research with the scientific method and is partitioned into six steps, referred to as “phases”, to allow for focused and deep thinking on the essential components of the scientific method. The phases are designed to challenge the student in their zone of proximal development so they learn to extract and ultimately comprehend the elements of the scientific method through focused written and oral assignments. Students then compile their newly acquired knowledge to create a compelling and logical story, using their persuasive written and oral presentations to complete a research proposal, final report, and formal 20 min presentation. We find that such an approach delivers the necessary guidance to promote the logical framework that improves writing and speaking skills. Over the past decade, we have witnessed both qualitative and quantitative gains in the students’ confidence in their abilities and skills (developed by this process), preparing them for future careers as young scientists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9202561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92025612022-06-17 The Scientific Method as a Scaffold to Enhance Communication Skills in Chemistry Montgomery, Thomas D. Buchbinder, Joanne Rae Gawalt, Ellen S. Iuliucci, Robbie J. Koch, Andrew S. Kotsikorou, Evangelia Lackey, Patrick E. Lim, Min Soo Rohde, Jeffrey Joseph Rupprecht, Alexander J. Srnec, Matthew N. Vernier, Brandon Evanseck, Jeffrey D. J Chem Educ [Image: see text] Scientific success in the field of chemistry depends upon the mastery of a wide range of soft skills, most notably scientific writing and speaking. However, training for scientific communication is typically limited at the undergraduate level, where students struggle to express themselves in a clear and logical manner. The underlying issue is deeper than basic technical skills; rather, it is a problem of students’ unawareness of a fundamental and strategic framework for writing and speaking with a purpose. The methodology has been implemented for individual mentorship and in our regional summer research program to deliver a blueprint of thought and reasoning that endows students with the confidence and skills to become more effective communicators. Our didactic process intertwines undergraduate research with the scientific method and is partitioned into six steps, referred to as “phases”, to allow for focused and deep thinking on the essential components of the scientific method. The phases are designed to challenge the student in their zone of proximal development so they learn to extract and ultimately comprehend the elements of the scientific method through focused written and oral assignments. Students then compile their newly acquired knowledge to create a compelling and logical story, using their persuasive written and oral presentations to complete a research proposal, final report, and formal 20 min presentation. We find that such an approach delivers the necessary guidance to promote the logical framework that improves writing and speaking skills. Over the past decade, we have witnessed both qualitative and quantitative gains in the students’ confidence in their abilities and skills (developed by this process), preparing them for future careers as young scientists. American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc. 2022-05-09 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9202561/ /pubmed/35722631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00113 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Montgomery, Thomas D. Buchbinder, Joanne Rae Gawalt, Ellen S. Iuliucci, Robbie J. Koch, Andrew S. Kotsikorou, Evangelia Lackey, Patrick E. Lim, Min Soo Rohde, Jeffrey Joseph Rupprecht, Alexander J. Srnec, Matthew N. Vernier, Brandon Evanseck, Jeffrey D. The Scientific Method as a Scaffold to Enhance Communication Skills in Chemistry |
title | The Scientific Method as a Scaffold to Enhance Communication
Skills in Chemistry |
title_full | The Scientific Method as a Scaffold to Enhance Communication
Skills in Chemistry |
title_fullStr | The Scientific Method as a Scaffold to Enhance Communication
Skills in Chemistry |
title_full_unstemmed | The Scientific Method as a Scaffold to Enhance Communication
Skills in Chemistry |
title_short | The Scientific Method as a Scaffold to Enhance Communication
Skills in Chemistry |
title_sort | scientific method as a scaffold to enhance communication
skills in chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT montgomerythomasd thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT buchbinderjoannerae thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT gawaltellens thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT iuliuccirobbiej thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT kochandrews thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT kotsikorouevangelia thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT lackeypatricke thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT limminsoo thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT rohdejeffreyjoseph thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT rupprechtalexanderj thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT srnecmatthewn thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT vernierbrandon thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT evanseckjeffreyd thescientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT montgomerythomasd scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT buchbinderjoannerae scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT gawaltellens scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT iuliuccirobbiej scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT kochandrews scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT kotsikorouevangelia scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT lackeypatricke scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT limminsoo scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT rohdejeffreyjoseph scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT rupprechtalexanderj scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT srnecmatthewn scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT vernierbrandon scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry AT evanseckjeffreyd scientificmethodasascaffoldtoenhancecommunicationskillsinchemistry |