Cargando…

Impact of local mask mandates upon COVID-19 case rates in Oklahoma

Use of face coverings has been shown to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Despite encouragements from the CDC and other public health entities, resistance to usage of masks remains, forcing government entities to create mandates to compel use. The state of Oklahoma did not create a state-wide mask...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Jared D., McCann, Melinda H., Richter, Scott J., Matson, Dakota, Robert, Jordan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35709189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269339
_version_ 1784728606703878144
author Taylor, Jared D.
McCann, Melinda H.
Richter, Scott J.
Matson, Dakota
Robert, Jordan
author_facet Taylor, Jared D.
McCann, Melinda H.
Richter, Scott J.
Matson, Dakota
Robert, Jordan
author_sort Taylor, Jared D.
collection PubMed
description Use of face coverings has been shown to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Despite encouragements from the CDC and other public health entities, resistance to usage of masks remains, forcing government entities to create mandates to compel use. The state of Oklahoma did not create a state-wide mask mandate, but numerous municipalities within the state did. This study compares case rates in communities with mandates to those without mandates, at the same time and in the same state (thus keeping other mitigation approaches similar). Diagnosed cases of COVID-19 were extracted from the Oklahoma State Department of Health reportable disease database. Daily case rates were established based upon listed city of residence. The daily case rate difference between each locality with a mask mandate were compared to rates for the portions of the state without a mandate. All differences were then set to a d0 point of reference (date of mandate implementation). Piecewise linear regression analysis of the difference in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates between mandated and non-mandated populations before and after adoption of mask mandates was then done. Prior to adopting mask mandates, those municipalities that eventually adopted mandates had higher transmission rates than the rest of the state, with the mean case rate difference per 100,000 people increasing by 0.32 cases per day (slope of difference = 0.32; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.51). For the post-mandate time period, the differences are decreasing (slope of -0.24; 95% CI -0.32 to -0.15). The pre- and post- mandate slopes differed significantly (p<0.001). The change in slope direction (-0.59; 95% CI -0.80 to -0.37) shows a move toward reconvergence in new case diagnoses between the two populations. Compared to rates in communities without mask mandates, transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 slowed notably in those communities that adopted a mask mandate. This study suggests that government mandates may play a role in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and other infectious respiratory conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9202880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92028802022-06-17 Impact of local mask mandates upon COVID-19 case rates in Oklahoma Taylor, Jared D. McCann, Melinda H. Richter, Scott J. Matson, Dakota Robert, Jordan PLoS One Research Article Use of face coverings has been shown to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Despite encouragements from the CDC and other public health entities, resistance to usage of masks remains, forcing government entities to create mandates to compel use. The state of Oklahoma did not create a state-wide mask mandate, but numerous municipalities within the state did. This study compares case rates in communities with mandates to those without mandates, at the same time and in the same state (thus keeping other mitigation approaches similar). Diagnosed cases of COVID-19 were extracted from the Oklahoma State Department of Health reportable disease database. Daily case rates were established based upon listed city of residence. The daily case rate difference between each locality with a mask mandate were compared to rates for the portions of the state without a mandate. All differences were then set to a d0 point of reference (date of mandate implementation). Piecewise linear regression analysis of the difference in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates between mandated and non-mandated populations before and after adoption of mask mandates was then done. Prior to adopting mask mandates, those municipalities that eventually adopted mandates had higher transmission rates than the rest of the state, with the mean case rate difference per 100,000 people increasing by 0.32 cases per day (slope of difference = 0.32; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.51). For the post-mandate time period, the differences are decreasing (slope of -0.24; 95% CI -0.32 to -0.15). The pre- and post- mandate slopes differed significantly (p<0.001). The change in slope direction (-0.59; 95% CI -0.80 to -0.37) shows a move toward reconvergence in new case diagnoses between the two populations. Compared to rates in communities without mask mandates, transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 slowed notably in those communities that adopted a mask mandate. This study suggests that government mandates may play a role in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and other infectious respiratory conditions. Public Library of Science 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9202880/ /pubmed/35709189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269339 Text en © 2022 Taylor et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Taylor, Jared D.
McCann, Melinda H.
Richter, Scott J.
Matson, Dakota
Robert, Jordan
Impact of local mask mandates upon COVID-19 case rates in Oklahoma
title Impact of local mask mandates upon COVID-19 case rates in Oklahoma
title_full Impact of local mask mandates upon COVID-19 case rates in Oklahoma
title_fullStr Impact of local mask mandates upon COVID-19 case rates in Oklahoma
title_full_unstemmed Impact of local mask mandates upon COVID-19 case rates in Oklahoma
title_short Impact of local mask mandates upon COVID-19 case rates in Oklahoma
title_sort impact of local mask mandates upon covid-19 case rates in oklahoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35709189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269339
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorjaredd impactoflocalmaskmandatesuponcovid19caseratesinoklahoma
AT mccannmelindah impactoflocalmaskmandatesuponcovid19caseratesinoklahoma
AT richterscottj impactoflocalmaskmandatesuponcovid19caseratesinoklahoma
AT matsondakota impactoflocalmaskmandatesuponcovid19caseratesinoklahoma
AT robertjordan impactoflocalmaskmandatesuponcovid19caseratesinoklahoma