Cargando…
Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees
Simple feature detectors in the visual system, such as edge-detectors, are likely to underlie even the most complex visual processing, so understanding the limits of these systems is crucial for a fuller understanding of visual processing. We investigated the ability of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35709295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263198 |
_version_ | 1784728616857239552 |
---|---|
author | Guiraud, Marie Roper, Mark Wolf, Stephan Woodgate, Joseph L. Chittka, Lars |
author_facet | Guiraud, Marie Roper, Mark Wolf, Stephan Woodgate, Joseph L. Chittka, Lars |
author_sort | Guiraud, Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Simple feature detectors in the visual system, such as edge-detectors, are likely to underlie even the most complex visual processing, so understanding the limits of these systems is crucial for a fuller understanding of visual processing. We investigated the ability of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) to discriminate between differently angled edges. In a multiple-choice, “meadow-like” scenario, bumblebees successfully discriminated between angled bars with 7° differences, significantly exceeding the previously reported performance of eastern honeybees (Apis cerana, limit: 15°). Neither the rate at which bees learned, nor their final discrimination performance were affected by the angular orientation of the training bars, indicating a uniform performance across the visual field. Previous work has found that, in dual-choice tests, eastern honeybees cannot reliably discriminate between angles with less than 25° difference, suggesting that performance in discrimination tasks is affected by the training regime, and doesn’t simply reflect the perceptual limitations of the visual system. We used high resolution LCD monitors to investigate bumblebees’ angular resolution in a dual-choice experiment. Bumblebees could still discriminate 7° angle differences under such conditions (exceeding the previously reported limit for Apis mellifera, of 10°, as well as that of A. cerana). Bees eventually reached similar levels of accuracy in the dual-choice experiment as they did under multiple-choice conditions but required longer learning periods. Bumblebees show impressive abilities to discriminate between angled edges, performing better than two previously tested species of honeybee. This high performance may, in turn, support complex visual processing in the bumblebee brain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9202920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92029202022-06-17 Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees Guiraud, Marie Roper, Mark Wolf, Stephan Woodgate, Joseph L. Chittka, Lars PLoS One Research Article Simple feature detectors in the visual system, such as edge-detectors, are likely to underlie even the most complex visual processing, so understanding the limits of these systems is crucial for a fuller understanding of visual processing. We investigated the ability of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) to discriminate between differently angled edges. In a multiple-choice, “meadow-like” scenario, bumblebees successfully discriminated between angled bars with 7° differences, significantly exceeding the previously reported performance of eastern honeybees (Apis cerana, limit: 15°). Neither the rate at which bees learned, nor their final discrimination performance were affected by the angular orientation of the training bars, indicating a uniform performance across the visual field. Previous work has found that, in dual-choice tests, eastern honeybees cannot reliably discriminate between angles with less than 25° difference, suggesting that performance in discrimination tasks is affected by the training regime, and doesn’t simply reflect the perceptual limitations of the visual system. We used high resolution LCD monitors to investigate bumblebees’ angular resolution in a dual-choice experiment. Bumblebees could still discriminate 7° angle differences under such conditions (exceeding the previously reported limit for Apis mellifera, of 10°, as well as that of A. cerana). Bees eventually reached similar levels of accuracy in the dual-choice experiment as they did under multiple-choice conditions but required longer learning periods. Bumblebees show impressive abilities to discriminate between angled edges, performing better than two previously tested species of honeybee. This high performance may, in turn, support complex visual processing in the bumblebee brain. Public Library of Science 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9202920/ /pubmed/35709295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263198 Text en © 2022 Guiraud et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Guiraud, Marie Roper, Mark Wolf, Stephan Woodgate, Joseph L. Chittka, Lars Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees |
title | Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees |
title_full | Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees |
title_fullStr | Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees |
title_full_unstemmed | Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees |
title_short | Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees |
title_sort | discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35709295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guiraudmarie discriminationofedgeorientationbybumblebees AT ropermark discriminationofedgeorientationbybumblebees AT wolfstephan discriminationofedgeorientationbybumblebees AT woodgatejosephl discriminationofedgeorientationbybumblebees AT chittkalars discriminationofedgeorientationbybumblebees |