Cargando…
Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation
The Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) criteria for clinically inactive disease (CID) and their proposal for glucocorticoid tapering do not consider MRI findings, despite the growing use of MRI and development of reliable MRI scoring tools. We aim to evaluate how CID...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1 |
_version_ | 1784728704238223360 |
---|---|
author | Gargh, Kapil Al-Abadi, Eslam Low, Samantha Harrison, Kathryn Coles, William Davis, Penny Johnson, Karl |
author_facet | Gargh, Kapil Al-Abadi, Eslam Low, Samantha Harrison, Kathryn Coles, William Davis, Penny Johnson, Karl |
author_sort | Gargh, Kapil |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) criteria for clinically inactive disease (CID) and their proposal for glucocorticoid tapering do not consider MRI findings, despite the growing use of MRI and development of reliable MRI scoring tools. We aim to evaluate how CID correlates with MRI scores and physician decision making. We retrospectively used the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Imaging Score (JIS) to score MRIs of all children with JDM over a 10-year period. Demographic, diagnosis, treatment and core set measures data were collected. Correlation between CID and JIS was assessed as well as correlation with the physician treatment decision. There were 25 patients with 59 follow-up episodes to analyse correlation between physician treatment decision and JIS; and 50 episodes for the CID category and JIS correlation. JIS was not significantly associated with the CID category but did correlate with the physician decision. No significant association was found between clinical decision and CID category. The JIS area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.80 (95% CI 0.62–0.99) with a score ≥ 8 to predict an escalation. JIS sensitivity and specificity were both 78% with accuracy of 78%, compared to only 67%, 46% and 49%, respectively, for the CID criteria. Clinical criteria alone are not sufficient to assess disease activity status. Clinical decision trends correlated to MRI findings but not PRINTO CID criteria. Multi centre prospective studies are needed to replicate our findings and establish how to best use MRI as a biomarker of disease activity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9203389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92033892022-06-18 Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation Gargh, Kapil Al-Abadi, Eslam Low, Samantha Harrison, Kathryn Coles, William Davis, Penny Johnson, Karl Rheumatol Int Short Communication The Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) criteria for clinically inactive disease (CID) and their proposal for glucocorticoid tapering do not consider MRI findings, despite the growing use of MRI and development of reliable MRI scoring tools. We aim to evaluate how CID correlates with MRI scores and physician decision making. We retrospectively used the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Imaging Score (JIS) to score MRIs of all children with JDM over a 10-year period. Demographic, diagnosis, treatment and core set measures data were collected. Correlation between CID and JIS was assessed as well as correlation with the physician treatment decision. There were 25 patients with 59 follow-up episodes to analyse correlation between physician treatment decision and JIS; and 50 episodes for the CID category and JIS correlation. JIS was not significantly associated with the CID category but did correlate with the physician decision. No significant association was found between clinical decision and CID category. The JIS area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.80 (95% CI 0.62–0.99) with a score ≥ 8 to predict an escalation. JIS sensitivity and specificity were both 78% with accuracy of 78%, compared to only 67%, 46% and 49%, respectively, for the CID criteria. Clinical criteria alone are not sufficient to assess disease activity status. Clinical decision trends correlated to MRI findings but not PRINTO CID criteria. Multi centre prospective studies are needed to replicate our findings and establish how to best use MRI as a biomarker of disease activity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9203389/ /pubmed/34796407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Gargh, Kapil Al-Abadi, Eslam Low, Samantha Harrison, Kathryn Coles, William Davis, Penny Johnson, Karl Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation |
title | Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation |
title_full | Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation |
title_fullStr | Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation |
title_short | Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation |
title_sort | juvenile dermatomyositis magnetic resonance imaging score (jis) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garghkapil juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation AT alabadieslam juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation AT lowsamantha juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation AT harrisonkathryn juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation AT coleswilliam juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation AT davispenny juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation AT johnsonkarl juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation |