Cargando…

Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation

The Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) criteria for clinically inactive disease (CID) and their proposal for glucocorticoid tapering do not consider MRI findings, despite the growing use of MRI and development of reliable MRI scoring tools. We aim to evaluate how CID...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gargh, Kapil, Al-Abadi, Eslam, Low, Samantha, Harrison, Kathryn, Coles, William, Davis, Penny, Johnson, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1
_version_ 1784728704238223360
author Gargh, Kapil
Al-Abadi, Eslam
Low, Samantha
Harrison, Kathryn
Coles, William
Davis, Penny
Johnson, Karl
author_facet Gargh, Kapil
Al-Abadi, Eslam
Low, Samantha
Harrison, Kathryn
Coles, William
Davis, Penny
Johnson, Karl
author_sort Gargh, Kapil
collection PubMed
description The Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) criteria for clinically inactive disease (CID) and their proposal for glucocorticoid tapering do not consider MRI findings, despite the growing use of MRI and development of reliable MRI scoring tools. We aim to evaluate how CID correlates with MRI scores and physician decision making. We retrospectively used the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Imaging Score (JIS) to score MRIs of all children with JDM over a 10-year period. Demographic, diagnosis, treatment and core set measures data were collected. Correlation between CID and JIS was assessed as well as correlation with the physician treatment decision. There were 25 patients with 59 follow-up episodes to analyse correlation between physician treatment decision and JIS; and 50 episodes for the CID category and JIS correlation. JIS was not significantly associated with the CID category but did correlate with the physician decision. No significant association was found between clinical decision and CID category. The JIS area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.80 (95% CI 0.62–0.99) with a score ≥ 8 to predict an escalation. JIS sensitivity and specificity were both 78% with accuracy of 78%, compared to only 67%, 46% and 49%, respectively, for the CID criteria. Clinical criteria alone are not sufficient to assess disease activity status. Clinical decision trends correlated to MRI findings but not PRINTO CID criteria. Multi centre prospective studies are needed to replicate our findings and establish how to best use MRI as a biomarker of disease activity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9203389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92033892022-06-18 Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation Gargh, Kapil Al-Abadi, Eslam Low, Samantha Harrison, Kathryn Coles, William Davis, Penny Johnson, Karl Rheumatol Int Short Communication The Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) criteria for clinically inactive disease (CID) and their proposal for glucocorticoid tapering do not consider MRI findings, despite the growing use of MRI and development of reliable MRI scoring tools. We aim to evaluate how CID correlates with MRI scores and physician decision making. We retrospectively used the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Imaging Score (JIS) to score MRIs of all children with JDM over a 10-year period. Demographic, diagnosis, treatment and core set measures data were collected. Correlation between CID and JIS was assessed as well as correlation with the physician treatment decision. There were 25 patients with 59 follow-up episodes to analyse correlation between physician treatment decision and JIS; and 50 episodes for the CID category and JIS correlation. JIS was not significantly associated with the CID category but did correlate with the physician decision. No significant association was found between clinical decision and CID category. The JIS area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.80 (95% CI 0.62–0.99) with a score ≥ 8 to predict an escalation. JIS sensitivity and specificity were both 78% with accuracy of 78%, compared to only 67%, 46% and 49%, respectively, for the CID criteria. Clinical criteria alone are not sufficient to assess disease activity status. Clinical decision trends correlated to MRI findings but not PRINTO CID criteria. Multi centre prospective studies are needed to replicate our findings and establish how to best use MRI as a biomarker of disease activity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9203389/ /pubmed/34796407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Short Communication
Gargh, Kapil
Al-Abadi, Eslam
Low, Samantha
Harrison, Kathryn
Coles, William
Davis, Penny
Johnson, Karl
Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation
title Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation
title_full Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation
title_fullStr Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation
title_short Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation
title_sort juvenile dermatomyositis magnetic resonance imaging score (jis) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a single-centre retrospective evaluation
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1
work_keys_str_mv AT garghkapil juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation
AT alabadieslam juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation
AT lowsamantha juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation
AT harrisonkathryn juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation
AT coleswilliam juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation
AT davispenny juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation
AT johnsonkarl juveniledermatomyositismagneticresonanceimagingscorejisdoesnotcorrelatewithcriteriaforclinicallyinactivediseaseasinglecentreretrospectiveevaluation