Cargando…
Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential additional benefit of the local application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on the clinical outcomes following non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) (steps 1 and 2 periodontal therapy). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in sev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35389113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04474-1 |
_version_ | 1784728705509097472 |
---|---|
author | Roccuzzo, Andrea Imber, Jean-Claude Stähli, Alexandra Kloukos, Dimitrios Salvi, Giovanni E. Sculean, Anton |
author_facet | Roccuzzo, Andrea Imber, Jean-Claude Stähli, Alexandra Kloukos, Dimitrios Salvi, Giovanni E. Sculean, Anton |
author_sort | Roccuzzo, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential additional benefit of the local application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on the clinical outcomes following non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) (steps 1 and 2 periodontal therapy). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in several electronic databases, including Medline/PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Register of Central Trials (CENTRAL), LILACS, and grey literature. Only randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion. Clinical attachment level (CAL) change (primary outcome), probing pocket depth (PPD), and bleeding on probing (BoP) reductions (secondary outcomes) were evaluated. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the quality of the included trials. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between test and control sites were estimated using a random-effect model for amount of mean CAL and PPD change. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included for the qualitative analysis, while data from 4 studies were used for meta-analysis. Overall analysis of CAL gain (3 studies) and PPD reduction (4 studies) presented WMD of 0.14 mm (p = 0.74; CI 95% − 0.66; 0.94) and 0.46 mm (p = 0.25; CI 95% − 0.33; 1.26) in favor of NSPT + EMD compared to NSPT alone respectively. Statistical heterogeneity was found to be high in both cases (I(2) = 79% and 87%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within their limitations, the present data indicate that the local application of EMD does not lead to additional clinical benefits after 3 to 12 months when used as an adjunctive to NSPT. However, due to the high heterogeneity among the studies, additional well-designed RCTs are needed to provide further evidence on this clinical indication for the use of EMD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The adjunctive use of EMD to NSPT does not seem to additionally improve the clinical outcomes obtained with NSPT alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04474-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9203394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92033942022-06-18 Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Roccuzzo, Andrea Imber, Jean-Claude Stähli, Alexandra Kloukos, Dimitrios Salvi, Giovanni E. Sculean, Anton Clin Oral Investig Review OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential additional benefit of the local application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on the clinical outcomes following non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) (steps 1 and 2 periodontal therapy). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in several electronic databases, including Medline/PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Register of Central Trials (CENTRAL), LILACS, and grey literature. Only randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion. Clinical attachment level (CAL) change (primary outcome), probing pocket depth (PPD), and bleeding on probing (BoP) reductions (secondary outcomes) were evaluated. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the quality of the included trials. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between test and control sites were estimated using a random-effect model for amount of mean CAL and PPD change. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included for the qualitative analysis, while data from 4 studies were used for meta-analysis. Overall analysis of CAL gain (3 studies) and PPD reduction (4 studies) presented WMD of 0.14 mm (p = 0.74; CI 95% − 0.66; 0.94) and 0.46 mm (p = 0.25; CI 95% − 0.33; 1.26) in favor of NSPT + EMD compared to NSPT alone respectively. Statistical heterogeneity was found to be high in both cases (I(2) = 79% and 87%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within their limitations, the present data indicate that the local application of EMD does not lead to additional clinical benefits after 3 to 12 months when used as an adjunctive to NSPT. However, due to the high heterogeneity among the studies, additional well-designed RCTs are needed to provide further evidence on this clinical indication for the use of EMD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The adjunctive use of EMD to NSPT does not seem to additionally improve the clinical outcomes obtained with NSPT alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04474-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9203394/ /pubmed/35389113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04474-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Roccuzzo, Andrea Imber, Jean-Claude Stähli, Alexandra Kloukos, Dimitrios Salvi, Giovanni E. Sculean, Anton Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35389113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04474-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roccuzzoandrea enamelmatrixderivativeasadjunctivetononsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT imberjeanclaude enamelmatrixderivativeasadjunctivetononsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT stahlialexandra enamelmatrixderivativeasadjunctivetononsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kloukosdimitrios enamelmatrixderivativeasadjunctivetononsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT salvigiovannie enamelmatrixderivativeasadjunctivetononsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sculeananton enamelmatrixderivativeasadjunctivetononsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |