Cargando…
The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching
A wealth of studies have shown that humans are remarkably poor at determining whether two face images show the same person or not (face matching). Given the prevalence of photo-ID, and the fact that people employed to check photo-ID are typically unfamiliar with the person pictured, there is a need...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35581726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03010066221096987 |
_version_ | 1784728748080234496 |
---|---|
author | Ritchie, Kay L. Flack, Tessa R. Fuller, Elizabeth A. Cartledge, Charlotte Kramer, Robin S. S. |
author_facet | Ritchie, Kay L. Flack, Tessa R. Fuller, Elizabeth A. Cartledge, Charlotte Kramer, Robin S. S. |
author_sort | Ritchie, Kay L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A wealth of studies have shown that humans are remarkably poor at determining whether two face images show the same person or not (face matching). Given the prevalence of photo-ID, and the fact that people employed to check photo-ID are typically unfamiliar with the person pictured, there is a need to improve unfamiliar face matching accuracy. One method of improvement is to have participants complete the task in a pair, which results in subsequent improvements in the low performer (“the pairs training effect”). Here, we sought to replicate the original finding, to test the longevity of the pairs training effect, and to shed light on the potential underlying mechanisms. In two experiments, we replicated the pairs training effect and showed it is maintained after a delay (Experiment 1). We found no differences between high and low performers in confidence (Experiment 1) or response times (Experiment 2), and the content of the pairs’ discussions (Experiment 2) did not explain the results. The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching is robust, but the mechanisms underlying the effects remain as yet unexplained. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9203675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92036752022-06-18 The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching Ritchie, Kay L. Flack, Tessa R. Fuller, Elizabeth A. Cartledge, Charlotte Kramer, Robin S. S. Perception Articles A wealth of studies have shown that humans are remarkably poor at determining whether two face images show the same person or not (face matching). Given the prevalence of photo-ID, and the fact that people employed to check photo-ID are typically unfamiliar with the person pictured, there is a need to improve unfamiliar face matching accuracy. One method of improvement is to have participants complete the task in a pair, which results in subsequent improvements in the low performer (“the pairs training effect”). Here, we sought to replicate the original finding, to test the longevity of the pairs training effect, and to shed light on the potential underlying mechanisms. In two experiments, we replicated the pairs training effect and showed it is maintained after a delay (Experiment 1). We found no differences between high and low performers in confidence (Experiment 1) or response times (Experiment 2), and the content of the pairs’ discussions (Experiment 2) did not explain the results. The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching is robust, but the mechanisms underlying the effects remain as yet unexplained. SAGE Publications 2022-05-17 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9203675/ /pubmed/35581726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03010066221096987 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Ritchie, Kay L. Flack, Tessa R. Fuller, Elizabeth A. Cartledge, Charlotte Kramer, Robin S. S. The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching |
title | The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching |
title_full | The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching |
title_fullStr | The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching |
title_full_unstemmed | The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching |
title_short | The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching |
title_sort | pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35581726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03010066221096987 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ritchiekayl thepairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching AT flacktessar thepairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching AT fullerelizabetha thepairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching AT cartledgecharlotte thepairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching AT kramerrobinss thepairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching AT ritchiekayl pairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching AT flacktessar pairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching AT fullerelizabetha pairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching AT cartledgecharlotte pairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching AT kramerrobinss pairstrainingeffectinunfamiliarfacematching |