Cargando…
Booster Vaccination Strategies for “Living With COVID-19”
Although the primary and secondary vaccination rates in Korea account for over 75% of the total population, confirmed cases of COVID-19 are dramatically increasing due to immune waning and the Omicron variant. Therefore, it is urgent to evaluate the effectiveness of booster vaccination strategies fo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.896713 |
_version_ | 1784728856946540544 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Sunmi Kim, Hee-Sung |
author_facet | Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Sunmi Kim, Hee-Sung |
author_sort | Kim, Jung Eun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the primary and secondary vaccination rates in Korea account for over 75% of the total population, confirmed cases of COVID-19 are dramatically increasing due to immune waning and the Omicron variant. Therefore, it is urgent to evaluate the effectiveness of booster vaccination strategies for living with COVID-19. In this work, we have developed an age-specific mathematical model with eight age groups and included age-specific comorbidities to evaluate the effectiveness of age-specific vaccination prioritization strategies to minimize morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, we have investigated the impacts of age-specific vaccination strategies for different vaccine supplies and non-pharmaceutical intervention levels during two periods: (1) when vaccine supply was insufficient and (2) after the emergence of the omicron variant. During the first period, the best option was to vaccinate the 30–49 year age group and the group with comorbidities to minimize morbidity and mortality, respectively. However, a booster vaccination should prioritize the 30–49 year age group to promote both minimal morbidity and mortality. Critical factors, such as vaccination speed, vaccine efficacy, and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), should be considered for effective vaccination prioritization as well. Primary, secondary vaccinations, and a booster shot vaccinations require different age prioritization strategies under different vaccination rates, vaccine efficacies, and NPI levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9204168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92041682022-06-18 Booster Vaccination Strategies for “Living With COVID-19” Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Sunmi Kim, Hee-Sung Front Public Health Public Health Although the primary and secondary vaccination rates in Korea account for over 75% of the total population, confirmed cases of COVID-19 are dramatically increasing due to immune waning and the Omicron variant. Therefore, it is urgent to evaluate the effectiveness of booster vaccination strategies for living with COVID-19. In this work, we have developed an age-specific mathematical model with eight age groups and included age-specific comorbidities to evaluate the effectiveness of age-specific vaccination prioritization strategies to minimize morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, we have investigated the impacts of age-specific vaccination strategies for different vaccine supplies and non-pharmaceutical intervention levels during two periods: (1) when vaccine supply was insufficient and (2) after the emergence of the omicron variant. During the first period, the best option was to vaccinate the 30–49 year age group and the group with comorbidities to minimize morbidity and mortality, respectively. However, a booster vaccination should prioritize the 30–49 year age group to promote both minimal morbidity and mortality. Critical factors, such as vaccination speed, vaccine efficacy, and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), should be considered for effective vaccination prioritization as well. Primary, secondary vaccinations, and a booster shot vaccinations require different age prioritization strategies under different vaccination rates, vaccine efficacies, and NPI levels. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9204168/ /pubmed/35719633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.896713 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kim, Lee and Kim. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Sunmi Kim, Hee-Sung Booster Vaccination Strategies for “Living With COVID-19” |
title | Booster Vaccination Strategies for “Living With COVID-19” |
title_full | Booster Vaccination Strategies for “Living With COVID-19” |
title_fullStr | Booster Vaccination Strategies for “Living With COVID-19” |
title_full_unstemmed | Booster Vaccination Strategies for “Living With COVID-19” |
title_short | Booster Vaccination Strategies for “Living With COVID-19” |
title_sort | booster vaccination strategies for “living with covid-19” |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.896713 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjungeun boostervaccinationstrategiesforlivingwithcovid19 AT leesunmi boostervaccinationstrategiesforlivingwithcovid19 AT kimheesung boostervaccinationstrategiesforlivingwithcovid19 |