Cargando…

Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass

In the present study, the Risk Malignancy Index (RMI) was calculated based on menopausal status, ultrasound (US) findings and serum biological cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels as a scoring system in Libyan females with ovarian masses (OMs) to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. A to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huwidi, Ali, Abobrege, Afaf, Assidi, Mourad, Buhmeida, Abdelbaset, Ermiah, Eramah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2022.2551
_version_ 1784728898643165184
author Huwidi, Ali
Abobrege, Afaf
Assidi, Mourad
Buhmeida, Abdelbaset
Ermiah, Eramah
author_facet Huwidi, Ali
Abobrege, Afaf
Assidi, Mourad
Buhmeida, Abdelbaset
Ermiah, Eramah
author_sort Huwidi, Ali
collection PubMed
description In the present study, the Risk Malignancy Index (RMI) was calculated based on menopausal status, ultrasound (US) findings and serum biological cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels as a scoring system in Libyan females with ovarian masses (OMs) to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. A total of 51 females with OMs referred to the Gynaecology Department of the National Cancer Institute in Misurata (Libya) between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for diagnostic testing. Clinicopathological and demographic data were obtained from patient records. A cut-off point of RMI=200 was used to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (range, 19-90 years) and 60% of the patients were premenopausal. Examination of the four RMI indices and disease status indicated that the association with the US score (P<0.0001) and with CA-125 (P=0.017) was highly significant. However, the age at diagnosis and menopausal status did not have any significant association with the disease status. The RMI with a cut-off point of 200 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5 and 90.7%, respectively, and a positive and negative predictive value of 63.6 and 97.5%, respectively. The association between the RMI and disease status was highly significant (P<0.0001). In conclusion, the RMI appears to be a reliable, simple and cost-effective tool for clinical differentiation between benign and malignant OMs. This may help to improve the optimal diagnosis and planning of an individualized treatment strategy. However, given the small sample size of the cohort, further validation using larger cohorts in other settings is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9204318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92043182022-06-22 Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass Huwidi, Ali Abobrege, Afaf Assidi, Mourad Buhmeida, Abdelbaset Ermiah, Eramah Mol Clin Oncol Articles In the present study, the Risk Malignancy Index (RMI) was calculated based on menopausal status, ultrasound (US) findings and serum biological cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels as a scoring system in Libyan females with ovarian masses (OMs) to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. A total of 51 females with OMs referred to the Gynaecology Department of the National Cancer Institute in Misurata (Libya) between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for diagnostic testing. Clinicopathological and demographic data were obtained from patient records. A cut-off point of RMI=200 was used to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (range, 19-90 years) and 60% of the patients were premenopausal. Examination of the four RMI indices and disease status indicated that the association with the US score (P<0.0001) and with CA-125 (P=0.017) was highly significant. However, the age at diagnosis and menopausal status did not have any significant association with the disease status. The RMI with a cut-off point of 200 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5 and 90.7%, respectively, and a positive and negative predictive value of 63.6 and 97.5%, respectively. The association between the RMI and disease status was highly significant (P<0.0001). In conclusion, the RMI appears to be a reliable, simple and cost-effective tool for clinical differentiation between benign and malignant OMs. This may help to improve the optimal diagnosis and planning of an individualized treatment strategy. However, given the small sample size of the cohort, further validation using larger cohorts in other settings is recommended. D.A. Spandidos 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9204318/ /pubmed/35747594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2022.2551 Text en Copyright: © Huwidi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Huwidi, Ali
Abobrege, Afaf
Assidi, Mourad
Buhmeida, Abdelbaset
Ermiah, Eramah
Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass
title Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass
title_full Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass
title_short Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass
title_sort diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2022.2551
work_keys_str_mv AT huwidiali diagnosticvalueofriskofmalignancyindexintheclinicalevaluationofovarianmass
AT abobregeafaf diagnosticvalueofriskofmalignancyindexintheclinicalevaluationofovarianmass
AT assidimourad diagnosticvalueofriskofmalignancyindexintheclinicalevaluationofovarianmass
AT buhmeidaabdelbaset diagnosticvalueofriskofmalignancyindexintheclinicalevaluationofovarianmass
AT ermiaheramah diagnosticvalueofriskofmalignancyindexintheclinicalevaluationofovarianmass